A Study on the Determinants of the United Nation’s Conflict Management Activities in 1946~2017
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the United Nations (the UN) has been established, it has played a great role to secure peace, protect people, and prevent war. When the UN identifies a conflict as a threat to world peace, it takes action under the Charter of the UN. However, the UN sometimes did not take any action for managing the conflicts. Why does the UN act in some conflicts but not in others? Even though previous research reveals the importance of P-5 states’ interests in the target nations, the severity of the conflict, and conflict trigger nations’ characteristics, studies regarding the impact of the relationship between superpower nations such as the U.S. and Russia/China on the UN’s action in international conflicts with empirical studies are absent. This article examines whether the relationship between the U.S. and Russia/China influences the UN’s action on the conflict in other parts of the world or not. This article provides empirical evidence that the relationship between Russia/China and the U.S. influences the UN’s taking action to the international conflicts. The results imply that the UN’s taking action to the conflict is depended on the UN’s original aim for peace and the relationship between the U.S. and Russia/China.
Abstract
Since the United Nations (the UN) has been established, it has played a great role to secure peace, protect people, and prevent war. When the UN identifies a conflict as a threat to world peace, it takes action under the Charter of the UN. However, the UN sometimes did not take any action for managing the conflicts. Why does the UN act in some conflicts but not in others? Even though previous research reveals the importance of P-5 states’ interests in the target nations, the severity of the conflict, and conflict trigger nations’ characteristics, studies regarding the impact of the relationship between superpower nations such as the U.S. and Russia/China on the UN’s action in international conflicts with empirical studies are absent. This article examines whether the relationship between the U.S. and Russia/China influences the UN’s action on the conflict in other parts of the world or not. This article provides empirical evidence that the relationship between Russia/China and the U.S. influences the UN’s taking action to the international conflicts. The results imply that the UN’s taking action to the conflict is depended on the UN’s original aim for peace and the relationship between the U.S. and Russia/China.
참고문헌 (35)
- Aydin, Aysegul, "Where Do States Go? Strategy in Civil War Intervention", Conflict Management and Peace Science, 27(1), pp.47~66 (2010)
- Beardsley, Kyle, "Following the Flag or Following the Charter? Examining the Determinants of UN Involvement in International Crises, 1945~2002", International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), pp.33~49 (2012)
- Bennis, Phylis, "Calling the Shots: How Washington Dominates Today’s U.N" (1996), Olive Branch Press
- Bove, V., "Supplying peace : Participation in and troop contribution to peacekeeping missions", Journal of Peace Research, 48(6), pp.699~714 (2011)
- Carment, David, "Evolutionary theory and ethnic conflict" (2001), Praeger
- "Dag Hammarskjold Library", ~ (2018)
- Doyle, MW, "International peacebuilding : A theoretical and quantitative analysis", The American Political Science Review, 94(4), pp.779~801 (2000)
- Doyle, MW, "Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations" (2006), Princeton University Press
- Dreher, Axel, "Global Horse Trading : IMF Loans for Votes in the United Nations Security Council", European Economic Review, 53(7), pp.742~757 (2009)
- Dreher, Axel, "Development Aid and International Politics:Does Membership on the UN Security Council Influence World Bank Decisions?", Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), pp.1~18 (2009)
- Fortna, VP, "Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace After Civil War", International Studies Quarterly, 48, pp.269~292 (2004)
- Fortna, VP, "Where peacekeepers go: Hypotheses and statistical evidence", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (2007)
- Fortna, VP, "Peace Time : Cease-Fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace Princeton" (2008), Princeton University Press
- Fortna, VP, "Does Peacekeeping Work?: Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War" (2008), Princeton University Press
- Gasiorowski, Mark, "Conflict and Interdependence:East-West Trade and Linkages in the Era of Detente", The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 26(4), pp.709~729 (1982)
- Gibbs, David, "Is Peacekeeping a New Form of Imperialism?", International Peacekeeping, 4, pp.122~128 (1997)
- Kim, Samuel S., "China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects" (1999), A Council on Foreign Relations Press
- Kuziemko, Ilyana, "How Much Is a Seat on the Security Council Worth? Foreign Aid and Bribery at the United Nations", Journal of Political Economy, 114(5), pp.905~930 (2006)
- 이동률, "유엔에서의 중국 외교행태에 대한 실증 연구: 안보리 표결행태를 중심으로", 한국과 국제정치, 23(3), pp.95~128 (2007), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
- 이신화, "유엔 다자주의 틀에서의 강대국 정치: 안보리 결의안과 미-중 안보경쟁", 동서연구, 30(1), pp.211~237 (2018), 동서문제연구원[DOI]
- Liu, Wei, "China in the United Nations" (2014), World Century Publishing Corporation
- Milner, M., "Interests, Institutions, and Information : Domestic Politics and International Relations" (1997), Princeton University Press
- Mills, Greg, "ConUNdrum: The Limits of the United Nations and the Search for Alternatives" (2009), Rowman and Littlefield
- Moravcsik, A., "Taking preferences seriously : A liberal theory of international politics", International Organization, 51(4), pp.513~553 (1997)
- Mueller, John E., "Trends in popular support for the wars in Korea and Vietnam", American Political Science Review, 65(2), pp.358~375 (1971)
- Mullenbach, M., "Deciding to keep peace : An analysis of international influences on the establishment of third-party peacekeeping missions", International Studies Quarterly, 49(3), pp.529~556 (2005)
- 박흥순, "유엔 (UN)과 ‘보호책임’ 원칙의 실행: 리비아 사태에 대한 유엔안보리의 대응과 유엔사무총장의 역할", Oughtopia (오토피아), 27(2), pp.71~115 (2012), 인류사회재건연구원
- Perkins, R, "Extra-territorial interventions in conflict spaces: Explaining the geographies of post-Cold War peacekeeping", Political Geography, 27(8), pp.895~914 (2008)
- Polachek, SW, "Liberalism and Interdependence : Extending the trade-conflict model", Journal of Peace Research, 36(4), pp.405~422 (1999)
- Polachek, W. Solomon, "Why Democracies Cooperate More and Fight Less:The Relationship Between International Trade and Cooperation", Review of International Economics, 5(3), pp.295~296 (1997)
- Ross, ML, "What do we know about natural resources and civil war?", Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), pp.337~356 (2004)
- Stojek, Szymon M., "The supply side of United Nations Peacekeeping operations: Trade ties and United Nations-led deployments to civil war states", European Journal of International Relations, pp.1~25 (2014)
- "Voting Practices in the United Nations for 2018", ~ (2019)
- Walter, B., "Bargaining failures and civil war", Annual Review of Political Science, 12, pp.243~261 (2009)
- Winfield, Nicole, "China Vetoes" (1999), Associated Press