근대전환기 강우지역 학맥 연구의 현황과 과제

Abstract

This paper examined the results of studies on the scholarly lineage of eight School that were active in the Gangwoo region as part of the basic work to understand the entire picture of scholarship in the Gangwoo region in the modern transition period. The eight School that were active in the Gangwoo region at that time refer to the Nammyeong School of Nammyeong(南冥) Jo Sik(曺植), the origin of Gangwoo scholarship, as well as the learning groups of Jeongjae(定齋) Yu Chi-myeong(柳致明), Hanju(寒洲) Lee Jin-sang(李震相), and Seongjae(性齋) Heo Jeon(許傳) from the Toegye scholarly lineage, and Nosa(蘆沙) Gi Jeong-jin(奇正鎭), Yeonjae(淵齋) Song Byeong-seon(宋秉璿), Ganjae(艮齋) Jeon Woo(田愚), and Hwaseo(華西) Lee Hang-ro(李恒老) from the Yulgok scholarly lineage. These School insisted on their own theories, held meetings with scholars, and developed scholarship all over the country. The Gangwoo region, the home of Nammyeong studies, fell into decline after the fall of the Nammyeong School due to the Injo Coup, and after hundreds of years of stagnation, the scholarship in the Gangwoo region was revived by these eight schools only when the modern transition period came. These Gangwoo literary scholars transcended partisan coloring and schools to engage in academic exchanges across various schools, and the academic exchanges passed down to their immediate successors followed by secondary, tertiary, and quarternary successors. The academic trend that took place in the Gangwoo region during the modern transition period was a unique phenomenon that had no precedent in our academic history. However, studies on the scholarly lineage of these School were conducted very rarely, and even such studies showed very large gaps between School. While studies on the Seongjae School and the Nosa School have been accumulated considerably, studies on the Jeongjae School and the Hanju School are still insignificant, and no study on the Hwaseo School has begun yet. The fact that studies on the Ganjae School have been conducted in recent years can be accepted as a positive response. Main causes of the scarcity of studies on the scholarly lineage include the difficulty of securing the records of literary scholars(門人錄) or records of alumni(師友錄), which are texts for such studies, the difficulty of investigating basic data on the hundreds of scholars included in these materials, and above all, the absence of researchers who can engage in such studies, despite that such studies are possible in the form of joint studies, not individual studies. Therefore, a change of recognition of such studies should occur first, and furthermore, such studies can get on a full-fledged track when physical and administrative conditions improve, and sufficient researchers can be secured. This is a very difficult task, but it is a task that must be carried out without a break because the entire picture of Gangwoo scholarship can be understood only when the various activities of the various School and the transmission of the scholarly lineage in the Gangwoo region that were carried out during the modern transition period are properly revealed.