『洪武正韻譯訓』 중국어 성모의 정속음 대응 양상
"Hong Moo Jung Woun Youk Hun" An aspect of correspondence between 'Jung-um' and 'Sog-um' in the consonant of Chinese character.
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the founding of the country, Joseon dynasty had put stress on the relation with China. They set up 'Sa-youk-won' (the government office which take charge of the works of the translation and interpretation) and left a lot of research data and works of translation. Especially Sejong the Great made phonology scholar, Sin Suk-Joo and Sung Sam-mun compile "Hong Moo Jung Woun Youk Hun" which show the reading of Chinese consonantal character in "Hong Moo Jung Woun" (the phonology book which was compiled at the first king of Ming dynasty, 1375) in Hangeul. Furthermore, he tried to contribute to the teaching the Chinese language by having a scholar Whang Chan revise the book and widely extended the education. (1) 'Young-sung-mo-wha' (changing into zero phonetic value or becoming soundless) of '의‘(ei) consonant. (2) Changing into voiceless sounds from voiced sounds. But there is an exception among the Molar sound. (3) Changing into a voiced consonant (Cha-chung-um-wha) of the Lingual sound 'jung'. (4) Changing into an unvoiced consonant (Jun-chung-um-wha) from voiced consonant among the Dental sound.
Abstract
Since the founding of the country, Joseon dynasty had put stress on the relation with China. They set up 'Sa-youk-won' (the government office which take charge of the works of the translation and interpretation) and left a lot of research data and works of translation. Especially Sejong the Great made phonology scholar, Sin Suk-Joo and Sung Sam-mun compile "Hong Moo Jung Woun Youk Hun" which show the reading of Chinese consonantal character in "Hong Moo Jung Woun" (the phonology book which was compiled at the first king of Ming dynasty, 1375) in Hangeul. Furthermore, he tried to contribute to the teaching the Chinese language by having a scholar Whang Chan revise the book and widely extended the education. (1) 'Young-sung-mo-wha' (changing into zero phonetic value or becoming soundless) of '의‘(ei) consonant. (2) Changing into voiceless sounds from voiced sounds. But there is an exception among the Molar sound. (3) Changing into a voiced consonant (Cha-chung-um-wha) of the Lingual sound 'jung'. (4) Changing into an unvoiced consonant (Jun-chung-um-wha) from voiced consonant among the Dental sound.
참고문헌 (45)
- 강식진, "飜譯老乞大朴通事의 右音 聲母體系" (1986), 釜山 慶南中國語文學會 1986
- 강식진, "中國語 聲母의 14c 以後 變化 연구" (1989), 釜山 慶南中國語文學會
- 강신항, "사성통해 범례에 대하여" (1988)
- 강신항, "四聲通解硏究" (1973)
- 강신항, "齒音과 한글 表音" (1983)
- 국어학회, "한국의 역학" (2000), 서울: 서울대학교출판부
- 강신항, "한국의 운서" (2000), 서울: 태학사
- 강신항, "洪武正韻譯訓의 硏究" (1972)
- 강신항, "訓民正音硏究" (1999), 서울: 성균관대학교 출판부
- 권은선, "洪武正韻譯訓』中國語 音韻體系 硏究" (2006)
- 김무림, "국어의 역사" (2004), 서울: 한국문화사
- 김무림, "사성통고 범례의 고찰" (1992)
- 김무림, "洪武正韻譯訓의 硏究" (1999), 서울: 월인
- 김완진, "續添洪武正韻에 대하여" (1966), 震檀學會
- 김태성, "15세기 조선에서 바라본 근대 중국어 음운체계", 28 (2001), 한국외대 언어연구소
- 김태성, "조선조선 申叔舟의 중국어관", 14집 (2002), 한국중국언어학회
- 김태성, "洪武正韻譯訓?序 釋補", 28 (2001), 한국외국어대학교 중국연구소
- 박병채, "洪武正韻譯訓 新硏究" (1999), 서울: 고려대학교 민족문화연구소
- 박현규, "洪武正韻』의 제본에 대한 조사 연구" (1990), 근역한문학회
- ?之珍, "中國言語學史" (2002), 上海: 上海古籍出版社
- 성원경, "東國正韻과 洪武正韻譯訓음의 비교연구" (1970), 『건국대학교 학술지』12 건국대학교
- 申叔舟, "洪武正韻譯訓" (1974), 高麗大學校 出版部 影印
- 심소희, "동아시아 지역의 언어관-정음 사상의 연구", 10집 (2000), 한국중국언어학회
- 安奇燮, "朝鮮時代 對 漢語 譯音書의 正音·俗音 성격의 再考 - 序·凡例上 기술을 중심으로-" (1988)
- 유재원, "伍倫全備諺解 中國語 音韻體系 硏究" (2002)
- 유재원, "조선시대의 두 가지 중국어음 표기 체계", 23 (2002), 중국학연구회
- 王力著, "中國言語學史" (1986), 啓明大學校出版部
- 우민섭, "중세음운연구" (2000), 전주: 전주대학교출판부
- 應裕康, "洪武正韻聲母音値之擬訂" (1970)
- 應裕康, "洪武正韻聲母音値之擬訂" (1970)
- 이강로, "四聲通解에 관련된 운서의 비교", 249 (2000), 한글학회
- 이강로, "四聲通解의 음운학적 硏究" (2000), 서울: 도서출판 박이정
- 이동림, "洪武正韻譯訓과 四聲通解의 비교" (1968), 동국대학교
- 이숭녕, "洪武正韻譯訓의 연구" (1959), 震檀學會
- 李新魁, "中國聲韻學槪論" (1990), 대광문화사
- 이영월, "四聲通解를 통한 초기관화 연구" (2004)
- 이재돈, "中國語音韻學" (1994)
- 이환주, "訓民正音의 이해" (1988), 한신문화사
- 정경일, "한국운서의 이해" (2002), 서울: 아카넷
- 정연찬, "洪武正韻譯訓 硏究" (1972)
- 朱星一, "15、16世紀朝漢對音硏究" (2000)
- 채영순, "조선대역한음 음운특징의 재고", 42 (2002), 한국중국학회
- 崔玲愛, "洪武正韻聲類考" (1980)
- 崔玲愛, "洪武正韻硏究" (1975), 臺灣大學
- 河惠丁, "朝鮮韻書의 正音觀 分析", 8 (1997), 東洋古典學會