The New Thinking on China’s Asia Diplomacy during the Post-Cold War Era: Institutional Model Choices and Sino-U.S. Compatibility
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Drawing support from international institution theory, this article analyzes China’s new thinking about Asian diplomacy after the Cold War. Institutionalism was flexibly utilized by China in its peripheral regions*Central Asia, Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia and South Asia, which have adopted institutional models*dominant participation, deep participation, active participation, and moderate participation models. China tries to handle the presence of U.S. interests well and has responded reasonably to U.S. pragmatic institutional engagement. To realize the aim of compatibility and coexistence between China and the United States in Asia, the two countries should establish interconnecting institutions in both economic and political fields. With regard to the future interactive trends of China and the United States in Asia, the author, from the dimension of international institutionalism, works out an institutional interplay*nested and overlapping institutions*for China and the United States to achieve accommodation.
Abstract
Drawing support from international institution theory, this article analyzes China’s new thinking about Asian diplomacy after the Cold War. Institutionalism was flexibly utilized by China in its peripheral regions*Central Asia, Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia and South Asia, which have adopted institutional models*dominant participation, deep participation, active participation, and moderate participation models. China tries to handle the presence of U.S. interests well and has responded reasonably to U.S. pragmatic institutional engagement. To realize the aim of compatibility and coexistence between China and the United States in Asia, the two countries should establish interconnecting institutions in both economic and political fields. With regard to the future interactive trends of China and the United States in Asia, the author, from the dimension of international institutionalism, works out an institutional interplay*nested and overlapping institutions*for China and the United States to achieve accommodation.
참고문헌 (43)
- Ni Shixiong, "Geo-Politics and the New Thinking of China’s Neighboring Diplomacy, In Multilateral Governance and International Order", pp.211~215 (2006), Shanghai People’s Publishing House
- "2006", (1)
- "2005", (4)
- Evan S. Medeiros, "China’s New Diplomacy", Foreign Affairs, 82(6), pp.22~35 (2003)
- Michael Yahuda, "China’s Multilateralism and Regional Order, In China Turns to Multilateralism: Foreign Policy and Regional Security", pp.75~89 (2008), Routledge
- U.S. Economic and Security Review Commission, , Report to Congress, pp.143~190 (2005), U.S. Government Office
- John J. Mearsheimer, "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics", pp.4~ (2001), W. W. Norton & Company
- "2005", (81)
- Robert Sutter, "China’s Recent Approach to Asia: Seeking Long Term Gains", The National Bureau of Asian Research, 13(1), pp.13~37 (2002), NBR Analysis
- David Shambaugh, "China’s New Engagement with the Region", The Asian Wall Street Journal, A9~ (2004)
- David M. Lampton, "The Faces of Chinese Power", Foreign Affairs, 86(1), pp.117~118 (2007)
- "Whither China? From Membership to Responsibility" (2005)[URL]
- Robert Keohane, "International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory", pp.3~5 (1989), Westview Press
- Andreas Hasenclever, "Peter Mayer and Volker Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Stephen Krasner, "Institutional Regimes" (1982), Cornell University Press
- Robert Keohane, "After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy" (1984), Princeton University Press
- Stephan Haggard, "Theories of International Regimes", International Organization, 41(3), pp.491~517 (1987)
- Kent Calder, "Securing Security through Prosperity: The San Francisco System in Comparative Perspective", The Pacific Review, 17(1), pp.135~157 (2004)
- Kai He, "International Balancing in the Asia Pacific: Economic Interdependence and China’s Rise", pp.49~79 (2009), Routledge
- "2008", (2)
- "2003", (5)
- "2008", (6)
- Guoguang Wu, "Multiple Levels of Multilateralism: The Rising China in a Turbulent World, In China Turns to Multilateralism", pp.270~
- "2005", (2)
- "2002", (1)
- "2008", (1)
- "Remarks at the ASEAN Regional Forum" (2009)[URL]
- Chen Qiaozhi, "ASEAN’s China Policy during the Post-Cold War Period", pp.17~18 (2001), China Social Sciences Press
- N. Ganesan, "ASEAN’s Relations with Major External Powers", Contemporary Southeast Asia: Journal of International & Strategic Affairs, 22(2), pp.256~278 (2000)
- "China’s Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi on Premier Wen Jiabao’s Attendance at East Asia Summit Series Meetings and Visiting Singapore" (2007)[URL]
- "2007", 3~
- "2008", (2)
- "2007", 3~
- "2007", (1)
- Dipankar Banerjee, "China and South Asia in the New Era, In Making New Partnership: A Rising China and its Neighbors", pp.214~ (2008), Social Sciences Academic Press
- Fu Xiaoqiang, , pp.321~ (2008), Social Sciences Academic Press
- "Analysis of the Advantages and Disadvantages of U.S. Troops to Afghanistan on China’s Peripheral Security" (2009)[URL]
- Chen Weihua, "U.S. Troop Plan Set to Impact China", China Daily 29, no. 9235, 1~ (2010)
- Quansheng Zhao, "China Rising: Theoretical Understanding and Global Response, In Managing the China Challenge: Global Perspectives, ed. Quansheng Zhao and Guoli Liu", pp.8~ (2009), Routledge
- David Shambaugh, "Sino-American Relations since September 11", Current History, 101(656), pp.243~249 (2002)
- Oran R. Young, "Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives", Global Governance, 2(1), pp.1~24 (1996)
- Karen J. Alter, "Nested and Overlapping Regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute", Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), pp.362~382 (2006)
- Qi Huaigao, "Contradictions and Compatibility between China’s Multilateral Cooperation System and the U.S.-led Bilateral Alliance Structure in East Asia", China International Studies, (14), pp.141~ (2009)