Why the United States Should Engage China: Theoretical, Historical, and Institutional Perspectives
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
While China is a great power undergoing a historic rise, its emergence oftenarouses complex and sometimes anxious reactions from its neighbors. A morefundamental concern may come from the still dominant superpower—the UnitedStates, which anticipates a probable power transition with China in the comingdecades. Historical cases, on the other hand, prove that China is culturally andstructurally different from the former emerging great powers, and following thelogic of the power transition theory many still believe that China’s rise will notbe peaceful. However, there are opportunities for China to rise peacefully, if weacknowledge the changes of power or power diffusion and the significance of acomprehensive engagement strategy. China’s active participation in internationalinstitutions also has provided a de facto opportunity for engaging China withinthe incumbent dominant system. Therefore, the issue of China’s possible peaceful risecan be revisited in the power transition theory, particularly through interconnectedtheoretical, historical, and institutional perspectives.
Abstract
While China is a great power undergoing a historic rise, its emergence oftenarouses complex and sometimes anxious reactions from its neighbors. A morefundamental concern may come from the still dominant superpower—the UnitedStates, which anticipates a probable power transition with China in the comingdecades. Historical cases, on the other hand, prove that China is culturally andstructurally different from the former emerging great powers, and following thelogic of the power transition theory many still believe that China’s rise will notbe peaceful. However, there are opportunities for China to rise peacefully, if weacknowledge the changes of power or power diffusion and the significance of acomprehensive engagement strategy. China’s active participation in internationalinstitutions also has provided a de facto opportunity for engaging China withinthe incumbent dominant system. Therefore, the issue of China’s possible peaceful risecan be revisited in the power transition theory, particularly through interconnectedtheoretical, historical, and institutional perspectives.
참고문헌 (40)
- A. F. K. Organski, "World Politics" (1958), Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
- A. F. K. Organski, "The War Ledger" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
- Jacek Kugler, "Parity and War" (1998), The University of Michigan Press
- Jack S. Levy, "China Ascent: Power, Security, and the Future of International Politics" (2008), Cornell University Press
- Douglas Lemke, "Power Transition Theory and the Rise of China", International Interactions, 29(4), pp.269~271 (2003)
- Ronald L. Tammen, "Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century" (2000), Chatham House Publishers
- Woosang Kim, "Parity and War", pp.103~ (1998), The University of Michigan Press
- Ronald L. Tammen, "Power Transition and China-U.S. Conflicts", Chinese Journal of International Politics, 1 (2006)
- Alastair Iain Johnston, "Is China a Status Quo Power?", International Security, 27(4), pp.5~56 (2003)
- Sheng Ding, "Analyzing Rising Power from the Perspective of Soft Power: A New Look at China’s Rise to the Status Quo Power", Journal of Contemporary China, pp.255~272 (2010)
- Scott L. Kastner, "Is China a Status Quo or Revisionist State? Leadership Travel as an Empirical Indicator of Foreign Policy Priorities", International Studies Quarterly, 56, pp.163~177 (2012)
- "Why China’s Rise Will Be Peaceful: Hierarchy and Stability in the East Asian Region"[URL]
- "Red China Threat Seminar" (2008)[URL]
- John Mearsheimer, "The Rise of China Will Not Be Peaceful at All" (2005), The Australian
- "From Uni-Multipolarity Model to Bi-Multipolarity Model"[URL]
- G. John Ikenberry, "The Rise of China and the Future of the West", Foreign Affairs, 87(1), pp.23~27 (2008)
- Feng Yongping, "The Peaceful Transition of Power from the UK to the U.S.", Chinese Journal of International Politics, 1 (2006)
- Ronald L. Tammen, "e-mail message to author", ~ (2012)
- "Sun Tzu on the Art of War"[URL]
- John K. Fairbank, "The Cambridge History of China, Volume II, Late Ch’ing, 1800–1911, Part 2" (1980), Cambridge University Press
- Samuel P. Huntington, "The Clash of Civilizations And The Remaking of World Order" (1996), Simon &Schuster, Inc.
- "Japan’s Manufacturing Share of Output, 1885–1940"[URL]
- Alexander Wendt, "Social Theory of International Politics" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Stefano Guzzini, "Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics" (2006), Routledge
- Jacek Kugler, "Asian Ascent: Opportunity for Peace or Precondition for War?”", International Studies Perspectives, pp.38~ (2006)
- "“Japan, Inc.: Winning the Most Important Battle” 97, no. 19 (1971)"[URL]
- "Japan in Decline? Power Transition in Asia and its Implications"[URL]
- Stephen M. Walt, "The Origins of Alliance", pp.1~ (1987), Cornell University Press
- "Two power shifts occurring this century: power transition and power diffusion" (2011)[URL]
- G. Shabbir Cheema, "Cross-border Governance in Asia: Regional Issues and Mechanisms", pp.1~ (2011), United Nations University Press
- Joseph S. Nye, Jr., "The Future of Power", pp.xvii~ (2011), Public Affairs
- Steve Chan, "Can’t Get No Satisfaction?: The Recognition of Revisionist States", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 4, pp.218~ (2004)
- Alastair Iain Johnston, "Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000", pp.33~34 (2007), Princeton University Press
- Wang Lin, "Comparative Studies of All States’ Participation in International Organizations", World Economics and Politics, 11, pp.51~ (2006)
- Li Shenming, "Reports on International Politics and Security (2007)" (2007), Social Sciences Academic Press
- "How China Should Deal with China threat theory?"[URL]
- Zhu Linqun, "Criteria and Analysis of China’s Participation in International System", Jianghai Academic Journal, pp.165~ (2009)
- Li Shenming, "Reports on International Politics and Security (2007)" (2007), Social Sciences Academic Press
- "Work with China, Don’t Contain It"[URL]
- "Nomination by the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations (Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry to be Secretary of State)"[URL]