본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Trump Administration’s Korean Nuclear Crisis Management and Prospects for Solution

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Korean nuclear crisis in 2017 was essentially a brinkmanship policy crisis deliberately created by the Trump administration. That is to say, the Trump administration forced the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) to choose between war and concession by imposing “maximum pressure,” so as to promote the process of denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. However, due to the DPRK’s hedging strategy, U.S. domestic political constraints, and lack of international cooperation, the negotiation between the United States and the DPRK reached a stalemate. There even had been a debate in the United States over whether or not the government would acquiesce to the DPRK being a nuclear state. If any real progress is to be achieved, the Trump administration must set limited goals under a practical scheme. And at the same time, the UN Security Council should formulate reversible provisions to restrain the United States and the DPRK from failing to keep their promises. It should also reduce the negative impact of the lack of mutual trust between the two countries with a guarantee of the international community, thereby accelerating the peace process of denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

Abstract

The Korean nuclear crisis in 2017 was essentially a brinkmanship policy crisis deliberately created by the Trump administration. That is to say, the Trump administration forced the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) to choose between war and concession by imposing “maximum pressure,” so as to promote the process of denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. However, due to the DPRK’s hedging strategy, U.S. domestic political constraints, and lack of international cooperation, the negotiation between the United States and the DPRK reached a stalemate. There even had been a debate in the United States over whether or not the government would acquiesce to the DPRK being a nuclear state. If any real progress is to be achieved, the Trump administration must set limited goals under a practical scheme. And at the same time, the UN Security Council should formulate reversible provisions to restrain the United States and the DPRK from failing to keep their promises. It should also reduce the negative impact of the lack of mutual trust between the two countries with a guarantee of the international community, thereby accelerating the peace process of denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Zhu Feng, "The Trump Administration’s Coercive Diplomacy towards DPRK", World Economics and Politics, 6 (2017)
  2. Yehoshafat Harkabi, "Nuclear War and Nuclear Peace", pp.36~ (1966), Israel Program for Scientific Translations
  3. Richard Ned Lebow, "Between Peace and War the Nature of the International Crisis", pp.69~72 (2018), Peking University Press
  4. Cheng Xiaoyong, "International Nuclear Crisis and Crisis Management", World Economics and Politics, pp.46~ (2015)
  5. Feng Haicang, "American International Crisis Management", pp.32~ (2010), Yi Wen Publishing Military
  6. Nuclear Posture Review, , Office of the Secretary of Defense, ~ (2018)
  7. Xia Liping, "Trump Administration’s Policy towards North Korean Nuclear Issue: An Analysis from the Perspective of Two-Level Game Theory", The Chinese Journal of American Studies, 6 (2017)
  8. "Kim Jong-un Presides over an Enlarged Meeting of the Central Military Commission of the Party", Korean Central News Agency, ~ (2019)
  9. Yang Bojiang, "From Nixon to Trump: A Historical Comparison of Two ‘Shocks’ from the Perspective of International Strategy and Analysis of Japan’s Response Path", Japanese Journal, pp.5~10 (2019)
  10. "S.Res.435—A Resolution Reaffirming the Importance of the General Security of Military Information Agreement between the Republic of Korea and Japan, and for Other Purposes"[URL]
  11. "Report of the Fifth Plenary Meeting of the 7th Central Committee of the WPK (Kim Jong Un’s 2020 New Year Address)" (2020)[URL]
  12. Jin Wen, "Talking about Marginal Policies", World Knowledge, ~ (1990)
  13. Qiu Meirong, "China–India Relations from 1959 to 1962: A Research Perspective on International Crisis Management", pp.96~ (2014), Tongji University Press
  14. Michael J. Mazarr, "The Hidden Components of the North Korean Military Challenge", RAND Corporation, ~ (2019)
  15. Jeffrey Lewis, "North Korea Wants to Keep Nuclear Weapons, Trump Now Seems to Default", The Washington Post, ~ (2019)
  16. Harry Katzianis, "The Nuclear War between the United States and North Korea Is Still Possible, But the Meeting between Trump and Kim Jong Un in the DMZ Reduces This Possibility", United States National Benefits, ~ (2019)
  17. Sonoda Kenji, "U.S. Intends to Adjust Strategy on DPRK Denuclearization Issue", Asahi Shimbun, ~ (2019)
  18. "Talk by Kim Kye-gwan, Adviser of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the DPRK", Korean Central News Agency, ~ (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)