본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

From Hegemony to the Balance of Power: The Rise of China and American Grand Strategy in East Asia

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This essay looks at America’s approach to order in East Asia. I argue that the United States has pursued a remarkably consistent grand strategy toward East Asia. It is built around American power, interests, and ideals. In this sense, it is not best seen as simply a geopolitical strategy of hegemony or balance of power. Rather, it is infused with distinctive American ideas about order, identity, and community. It is a synthesis of realist and liberal thinking. It has guided America’s relationship with East Asia during the long-era of U.S. hegemonic leadership, and it continues to inform today’s efforts by Washington to remain tied to East Asia and shape the terms of China’s rise. The United States seeks a regional order that is open and organized around widely-shared rules and principles of politics and economics. Chinese power and leadership will grow within the region. The American goal is not to prevent this growth in Chinese power and leadership, but to make sure it is not used to turn the region into a closed, illiberal Chinese sphere of influence. Overall, there are reasons for both the United States and China to restrain their geopolitical rivalry. They will surely struggle and compete, seeking to be the leading state in the region. But American efforts to contain China and China’s efforts to push the United States out of the region will both be self-defeating strategies. The most optimistic vision of a peaceful rise of China and a managed U.S.-Chinese rivalry in Asia is one in which Beijing comes to see that the American-led liberal international order can help facilitate China’s peaceful rise — and not stand as an obstacle to it.

Abstract

This essay looks at America’s approach to order in East Asia. I argue that the United States has pursued a remarkably consistent grand strategy toward East Asia. It is built around American power, interests, and ideals. In this sense, it is not best seen as simply a geopolitical strategy of hegemony or balance of power. Rather, it is infused with distinctive American ideas about order, identity, and community. It is a synthesis of realist and liberal thinking. It has guided America’s relationship with East Asia during the long-era of U.S. hegemonic leadership, and it continues to inform today’s efforts by Washington to remain tied to East Asia and shape the terms of China’s rise. The United States seeks a regional order that is open and organized around widely-shared rules and principles of politics and economics. Chinese power and leadership will grow within the region. The American goal is not to prevent this growth in Chinese power and leadership, but to make sure it is not used to turn the region into a closed, illiberal Chinese sphere of influence. Overall, there are reasons for both the United States and China to restrain their geopolitical rivalry. They will surely struggle and compete, seeking to be the leading state in the region. But American efforts to contain China and China’s efforts to push the United States out of the region will both be self-defeating strategies. The most optimistic vision of a peaceful rise of China and a managed U.S.-Chinese rivalry in Asia is one in which Beijing comes to see that the American-led liberal international order can help facilitate China’s peaceful rise — and not stand as an obstacle to it.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Art, Robert, "A Grand Strategy for America" (2003), Cornell University Press
  2. Bader, Jeffrey A., "Obama and China’s Rise: An Insider’s Account of America’s Asia Strategy" (2012), The Brookings Institution
  3. Brooks, Stephen G, "Don’t Come Home America: The Case against Retrenchment", International Security, 37(3), pp.7~51 (2012)
  4. Chan, Steve, "Looking for Balance: China, the United States, and Power Balancing in East Asia" (2012), Stanford University Press
  5. "America’s Pacific Century" (2011)[URL]
  6. Cohen, Warren I, "America’s Response to China: A History of Sino-American Relations" (2010), Columbia University Press
  7. Friedberg, Aaron, "A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia" (2012), Norton
  8. Goh, Evelyn, "The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia" (2013), Oxford University Press
  9. Green, Michael, "Japan’s Reluctant Realism : Foreign Policy Challenges in an Era of Uncertain Power" (2001), Palgrave Macmillan
  10. Gilpin, Robert, "War and Change in World Politics" (1981), Cambridge University Press
  11. Ikenberry, G. John, "American Hegemony and East Asia Order", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 58(3), pp.353~367 (2004)
  12. Ikenberry, G. John, "Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order" (2011), Princeton University Press
  13. Ikenberry, G. John, "Power, Order, and Change in World Politics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  14. Little, Richard, "The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  15. Mandlebaum, Michael, "The Ideas that Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy, and Free Markets in the Twenty-first Century" (2002), Public Affairs
  16. "US Counterbalancing China, Not Containing" (2013)[URL]
  17. Mastanduno, Michael, "Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features" (2003), Stanford University Press
  18. Mazower, Mark, "Governing the World : The History of an Idea" (2012), Allen Lane
  19. Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Power Politics" (2014), Norton
  20. Nye, Joseph, "Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power" (1990), Basic Books
  21. Nye, Joseph, "East Asian Security: The Case for Deep Engagement", Foreign Affairs, 74(4), pp.90~102 (1995)
  22. Obama, Barack, "Remarks by President Obama to the Australian Parliament", Speech, Canberra, Australia, November 17, 2011, ~ (2011)
  23. "The White House"[URL]
  24. Patrick, Stewart, "The Best Laid Plans: The Origins of American Multilateralism and the Dawn of the Cold War" (2009), Roman & Littlefield
  25. Pyle, Kenneth, "The Japanese Question: Power and Purpose in a New Era" (1996), AEI Press
  26. Samuels, Richard, "Securing Japan: Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia" (2007), Cornell University Press
  27. Shambaugh, David, "Tangled Titans : The United States and China" (2012), Rowman& Littlefield
  28. Sheehan, Michael, "The Balance of Power : History and Theory" (1996), Routledge
  29. Smith, Tony, "America’s Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century" (1994), Princeton University Press
  30. Steinberg, James, "Strategic Reassurance and Resolve: U.S.-China Relations in the Twenty-First Century" (2014), Princeton University Press

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)