본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

關漢卿 散曲과 雜劇 연구- 작품세계의 불일치 논쟁을 중심으로 -

A Study on Guan Hanqing’s Sanqu & Zaju

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Guan Hanqing is the prominent writer in the area of Sanqu and Zaju and both are usally evaluated totally different from each other. This belief comes from as follows. Zaju tends to criticize social reality actively(aggressively). Sanqu, meanwhile, escape from reality and settle for the personal taste so it has been devaluated relative importance. This tendency presupposes that Yuan Dynasty is dark ages. But in the frontline of Guan Hanqing’s literary works, under the control of Kublai Khan and Marco Polo’s jorney to the East, the period was not dark ages but full of vitality and taste for the arts. Guan Hanqing made the point clear in ‘Bu fu lao’ that his goal in life was making romance with women, especially courtesans. Romance between men and women took a central place in his literary works cause all of his writings reflected his aim regardless of Sanqu or Zaju. So appraisals of his works that Sanqu and Zaju are totally different from each other is not persuasive. The literati always win over love in Guan Hanqing’s work. They are so far as to defeat so many rivals such as wealthy merchants or the powerful. This tells the literati’s unconscious wishes. Then again, women play a leading role and the literati paly the fool in the process of romance. It means writer wants to meet the needs of audience, but at the same time to tell the literati’s shabby self-portraits. From a cultural history perspective, there are self awareness and pride of full-time writer of popular literature in the world of Guan Hanqing’s works. A figure of the literati who win competition and finally capture women’s heart is the very true self of popular writer who hunger for appeal to the mass. The world of Guan Hanqing’s works are self-portrait or declaration as the new style literati. In this context, reappraisal of Guan Hanqing’s value and real worth is necessary.

Abstract

Guan Hanqing is the prominent writer in the area of Sanqu and Zaju and both are usally evaluated totally different from each other. This belief comes from as follows. Zaju tends to criticize social reality actively(aggressively). Sanqu, meanwhile, escape from reality and settle for the personal taste so it has been devaluated relative importance. This tendency presupposes that Yuan Dynasty is dark ages. But in the frontline of Guan Hanqing’s literary works, under the control of Kublai Khan and Marco Polo’s jorney to the East, the period was not dark ages but full of vitality and taste for the arts. Guan Hanqing made the point clear in ‘Bu fu lao’ that his goal in life was making romance with women, especially courtesans. Romance between men and women took a central place in his literary works cause all of his writings reflected his aim regardless of Sanqu or Zaju. So appraisals of his works that Sanqu and Zaju are totally different from each other is not persuasive. The literati always win over love in Guan Hanqing’s work. They are so far as to defeat so many rivals such as wealthy merchants or the powerful. This tells the literati’s unconscious wishes. Then again, women play a leading role and the literati paly the fool in the process of romance. It means writer wants to meet the needs of audience, but at the same time to tell the literati’s shabby self-portraits. From a cultural history perspective, there are self awareness and pride of full-time writer of popular literature in the world of Guan Hanqing’s works. A figure of the literati who win competition and finally capture women’s heart is the very true self of popular writer who hunger for appeal to the mass. The world of Guan Hanqing’s works are self-portrait or declaration as the new style literati. In this context, reappraisal of Guan Hanqing’s value and real worth is necessary.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김보경, "관한경 산곡 연구", 석사, 문학, pp.2003
  2. 양회석, "대중작가인가 인민투사인가 - 역대 관한경 평가에 대한 비판적 검토 -", 중국인문과학, (52), pp.199~215 (2012), 중국인문학회
  3. 宮崎市定著, "中國史" (1983), 역민사
  4. 김호동, "마르코 폴로의 동방견문록" (2008), 사계절
  5. 樊凌雲, "異代同歌異曲同工- 柳永<傳花枝>詞與關漢卿【南呂ㆍ一枝花】<不伏老>套曲之比較", 中國文學硏究, (2) (1998)
  6. 高益榮, "元雜劇的文化精神闡釋" (2005), 中國社會科學出版社
  7. 郭英德, "關劇文化意蘊發微", 戱曲硏究, (30) (1989)
  8. 胡士瑩, "話本小說槪論" (1982), 中華書局
  9. 黃克, "娛人和自娛― 關漢卿劇曲和散曲不同傾向之管見", 「光明日報」, 1984년 5월 29일, ~ (1984)
  10. 黃仁宇, "赫遜河畔談中國歷史" (1997), 三聯書店
  11. 黃天驥, "關漢卿和關一齋", 文學評論叢刊, (9) (1981)
  12. 藍立蓂校註, "彙校詳注關漢卿集" (2006), 中華書局
  13. 李漢秋周維培校註, "關漢卿散曲集" (1990), 上海古籍出版社
  14. 梁歸智, "元曲的人文精神與文化啓示", 江蘇大學學報, 11 (2009)
  15. 羅錦堂, "元雜劇本事考" (1976), 順先出版公司
  16. 馬顯慈, "關漢卿白樸馬致遠三家散曲之比較硏究" (2004), 中華書局
  17. 唐圭璋, "宋詞紀事" (1982), 上海古籍出版社
  18. 王艶霞, "近25年來關漢卿硏究述評", 徐州敎育學院學報, 6(20) (2005)
  19. 楊秋紅, "世俗的魅惑與儒生的妄想- 關漢卿愛情劇中的俗文化特質探析", 信陽師 範學院學報 (2005)
  20. 張大新, "二十世紀元代戱劇硏究" (2007), 人民文學出版社
  21. 張月中主編, "石家莊" (1999), 山西古籍出版社
  22. 張云生, "北京" (1990), 開明出版社
  23. 陳維昭, "20世紀中國古代文學硏究史ㆍ戱曲卷" (2006), 東方出版中心
  24. 謝桃坊, "柳永詞選評" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
  25. 薛瑞生, "樂章集校註" (2002), 中華書局

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)