A Vanguard of Foreign Policy over Maritime Claims: Naval Power rather than National Power
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Most quantitative studies about maritime claims use national power measured by gross indicators, such as the CINC score, to explain disputants’ foreign policy leverage over maritime claims. The basic assumption in using national power to analyze issues over maritime claims is that wealthier, more developed, more populous countries can transfer abundant resources into military potentials, which enables them to have stronger foreign policy leverage over maritime claims. This research does not attempt to deny this assumption. This study, however, argues that based on the inherent advantages of naval power to project power over the sea, naval power measured by the total tonnage of warships is theoretically better and empirically different from national power, and the usage of naval power enhances understanding about disputants’ foreign policy behaviors over maritime claims. Therefore, I conclude that naval power rather than national power is a better and more tailored indicator to explain issues, especially the occurrence of militarized disputes over maritime claims.
Abstract
Most quantitative studies about maritime claims use national power measured by gross indicators, such as the CINC score, to explain disputants’ foreign policy leverage over maritime claims. The basic assumption in using national power to analyze issues over maritime claims is that wealthier, more developed, more populous countries can transfer abundant resources into military potentials, which enables them to have stronger foreign policy leverage over maritime claims. This research does not attempt to deny this assumption. This study, however, argues that based on the inherent advantages of naval power to project power over the sea, naval power measured by the total tonnage of warships is theoretically better and empirically different from national power, and the usage of naval power enhances understanding about disputants’ foreign policy behaviors over maritime claims. Therefore, I conclude that naval power rather than national power is a better and more tailored indicator to explain issues, especially the occurrence of militarized disputes over maritime claims.
참고문헌 (53)
- Ian Storey, "China’s Aircraft Carrier Ambitions: Seeking the Truth from the Rumors", Naval War College Review, 57(1), pp.87~ (2004)
- "Photos Show How Close Chinese Warship Came to Colliding with US Destroyer" (2019)[URL]
- Daniel Jones, "Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992 : Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns", Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(2), pp.163~213 (1996)
- Cullen Hendrix, "Measuring State Capacity : Theoretical and Empirical Implications for the Study of Civil Conflict", Journal Peace Research, 47(3), pp.273~285 (2010)
- Douglas Gibler, "State Development, Parity, and International Conflict", American Political Science Review, 111(1), pp.21~38 (2017)
- Michael Beckley, "The Power of Nations : Measuring What Matters", International Security, 43(2), pp.7~44 (2018)
- Paul Hensel, "Bones of Contention : Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues", The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(1), pp.117~143 (2008)
- "Data is available on the ICOW Web site at"[URL]
- "Codebook for Maritime Claims Data, Issue Correlates of War (ICOW) Project"[URL]
- Stephen Nemeth, "Ruling the Sea : Managing Maritime Conflicts through UNCLOS and Exclusive Economic Zones", International Interactions, 40(5), pp.711~736 (2014)
- Natalie Klein, "Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea", pp.13~ (2011), Oxford University Press
- Basil Germond, "The Maritime Dimension of European Security Seapower and the European Union", pp.14~ (2015), Palgrave Macmillan
- John Mearsheimer, "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics", pp.114~ (2014), W. W. Norton
- George Modelski, "Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993", pp.3~11 (1988), University of Washington Press
- Geoffrey Till, "Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty–First Century", pp.20~23 (2009), Routledge
- Ken Booth, "Navies and Foreign Policy", pp.251~ (1979), Holmes & Meier Publishers
- Jonathan Markowitz, "Going the Distance : The Price of Projecting Power", International Interactions, 39(2), pp.123~ (2013)
- Eric Grove, "The Future of Sea Power" (1990), Naval Institute Press
- Douglas Lemke, "Regions of War and Peace", pp.85~ (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Alfred Mahan, "The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783", pp.91~ (1890), Dover Publications
- Sean Bolks, "The Arms Acquisition Process : The Effect of Internal and External Constraints on Arms Race Dynamics", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(5), pp.583~ (2000)
- Sverrir Steinsson, "Neoclassical Realism in the North Atlantic : Explaining Behaviors and Outcomes in the Cod Wars", Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3), pp.614~ (2017)
- Donald Barry, "The Canada–European Union Turbot War Internal Politics and Transatlantic Bargaining", International Journal, 53(2), pp.264~266 (1998)
- Elizabeth Nyman, "Oceans of Conflict : Determining Potential Areas of Maritime Disputes", SAIS Review of International Affairs, 33(3), pp.6~ (2013)
- Colin S. Gray, "The Navy in the Post–Cold War World : The Use and Value of Strategic Sea Power", pp.18~ (1994), The Pennsylvania State University Press
- Jack Levy, "Balancing on Land and at Sea : Do States Ally against the Leading Global Power?", International Security, 35(1), pp.38~ (2010)
- George Boyce, "The Falklands War", pp.39~ (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
- Bernard Oxman, "The Regime of Warships under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea", Virginia Journal of International Law, 24(4), pp.819~ (1984)
- Ashley Roach, "Excessive Maritime Claims", pp.6~9 (2012), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
- Peter Dutton, "China’s Maritime Disputes in the East and South China Seas", Naval War College Review, 67(3), pp.16~ (2014)
- Patrick O’Hara, "The Navy as a Political Instrument: Freedom of Navigation Operations 1958–2013", PhD, pp.2016
- "With Naval Exercises, China Cozies Up to U.S. Friends in Southeast Asia" (2018)[URL]
- Andrew Owsiak, "Conflict Management in Land, River, and Maritime Claims", Political Science Research and Methods, 7(1), pp.43~61 (2019)
- Áslaug Ásgeirsdóttir, "Distributive Outcomes in Contested Maritime Areas: The Role of Inside Options in Settling Competing Claims", Journal of Conflict Resolution, pp.1284~1313 (2016)
- David Lektzian, "Territory, River, and Maritime Claims in the Western Hemisphere : Regime Type, Rivalry, and MIDs, 1901 to 2000", International Studies Quarterly, 54(4), pp.1073~1098 (2010)
- Elizabeth Nyman, "Offshore Oil Development and Maritime Conflict in the 20th Century : A Statistical Analysis of International Trends", Energy Research & Social Science, 6, pp.1~7 (2015)
- Brian Crisher, "Power at Sea : A Naval Power Dataset, 1865–2011", International Interactions, 40, pp.602~629 (2014)
- "CIA World Fact Book"[URL]
- Darcie Draudt, "The Strategic Rationale for Maritime Tension Reduction in the Yellow Sea", The Washington Quarterly, 40(4), pp.186~ (2017)
- Jon Van Dyke, "The North", South Boundary Dispute in the Yellow(West)Sea, 2003, pp.27(2), 143~146
- Narushige Michishita, "North Korea’s Military–Diplomatic Campaigns, 1966–2008", pp.52~ (2010), Routledge
- "North Korean Provocative Actions, 1950–2007" (2007)[URL]
- Harrison Wagner, "War and the State : The Theory of International Politics" (2007), University of Michigan Press
- Douglas Lemke, "Power Parity, Commitment to Change, and War", International Studies Quarterly, 40(2), pp.235~260 (1996)
- Bridget Coggins, "Global Patterns of Maritime Piracy, 2000–09 : Introducing a New Dataset", Journal of Peace Research, 49(4), pp.608~ (2012)
- "On Maritime Piracy: A Geospatial Analysis 1995–2013"[URL]
- Ursula Daxecker, "Insurgents of the Sea : Institutional and Economic Opportunities for Maritime Piracy", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(6), pp.940~965 (2012)
- Ursula Daxecker, "The New Barbary Wars : Forecasting Maritime Piracy", Foreign Policy Analysis, 11, pp.23~44 (2015)
- Ryan Jablonski, "The Political Economy of Plunder : Economic Opportunity and Modern Piracy", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(4), pp.682~708 (2013)