현대 중국어 선택의문형 반어문의 의미 연구
A Meaning Study on Rhetorical question of Alternative questions Type in Modern Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The research aims to analyze and formulate meanings of rhetorical question of alternative questions through the sematic approach. For this purpose, the paper addresses the recognition conditions of rhetorical question of alternative questions and then, analyzes their meaning structures, and finally, reviews the meaning formation conditions. The results are as follows: First, through analyzing the recognition conditions of rhetorical question of alternative questions, the conditions can be divided into marked types and unmarked ones depending on markedness; marked types also can be classified into direct and indirect markedness. On the other hand, in unmarked types, situational, social morals, general common senses are considered. Second, in semantic structure analysis, based on semantic hierarchy theory proposed by Sebastian Löbner, 2002, the meaning of rhetorical question of alternative questions was analyzed in three ways: expressive meaning, utterance meaning, and communicative one. Additively, its formative structure is expressive plus utterance plus communicative meaning. Third, by analyzing meaning formation condition of rhetorical question of alternative questions, ‘negative meaning’ of rhetorical question of alternative questions, an expressive meaning, was derived from syntactic form of alternative questions, thus the ‘negative meaning’ takes syntactic form of alternative questions as the meaning formation prerequisite. Meanwhile, the others, the conditions of utterance and communicative meanings are mainly context, morality, common sense, etc.
Abstract
The research aims to analyze and formulate meanings of rhetorical question of alternative questions through the sematic approach. For this purpose, the paper addresses the recognition conditions of rhetorical question of alternative questions and then, analyzes their meaning structures, and finally, reviews the meaning formation conditions. The results are as follows: First, through analyzing the recognition conditions of rhetorical question of alternative questions, the conditions can be divided into marked types and unmarked ones depending on markedness; marked types also can be classified into direct and indirect markedness. On the other hand, in unmarked types, situational, social morals, general common senses are considered. Second, in semantic structure analysis, based on semantic hierarchy theory proposed by Sebastian Löbner, 2002, the meaning of rhetorical question of alternative questions was analyzed in three ways: expressive meaning, utterance meaning, and communicative one. Additively, its formative structure is expressive plus utterance plus communicative meaning. Third, by analyzing meaning formation condition of rhetorical question of alternative questions, ‘negative meaning’ of rhetorical question of alternative questions, an expressive meaning, was derived from syntactic form of alternative questions, thus the ‘negative meaning’ takes syntactic form of alternative questions as the meaning formation prerequisite. Meanwhile, the others, the conditions of utterance and communicative meanings are mainly context, morality, common sense, etc.
참고문헌 (35)
- 郭繼懋, "反問句的語義語用特點", 中國語文, (2) (1997)
- 김수진, "疑問表現における反語文の一考察 -日?韓對照を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 57(1), pp.58~77 (2006), 한국일어일문학회
- 邓守信, "現代漢語的否定", 南開大學語言學刊, (1), pp.91~102 (2002)
- 리&톰슨, "표준중국어 문법" (1999), 한울 아카데미
- 范曉, "語法理論綱要" (2003), 上海譯文出版社
- 徐傑, "焦點和兩個非線性語法範疇:“否定”“疑問”", 中国语文, (2), pp.81~92 (1993)
- 邵敬敏, "現代漢選擇問硏究", 語言敎學與硏究, (2), pp.49~67 (1994)
- 邵敬敏, "現代漢語疑問句硏究" (1996), 華東師範大學出版社
- 孙汝建, "句子的否定與句子的局部否定", 南通師範学院学报, 20(2), pp.77~80 (2004)
- 沈家煊, "“语用否定”考察", 中国语文, (5), pp.321~331 (1993)
- 양영매, "현대중국어 선택의문형 반어문의 부정의미 연구", 중국언어연구, (53), pp.157~178 (2014), 한국중국언어학회
- 黎錦熙, "新著國語文法" (2001), 商務印書館
- 呂叔湘, "中國文法要略" (1982), 文史哲出版社
- 呂叔湘, "疑問ㆍ否定ㆍ肯定", 中國語文, (4), pp.241~250 (1985)
- 王菊平, "现代汉语反问句研究", 석사, pp.2007
- 王力, "中國現代語法" (2000), 商務印書館
- 于根元, "反问句的性质和作用", 中国语文, (6), pp.419~425 (1984)
- 于天昱, "现代汉语反问句研究", 박사, pp.2007
- 袁毓林, "论否定句的焦點、预设和辖域歧义", 中国语文, (2), pp.99~108 (2000)
- 熊仲儒, "否定焦點及其句法蘊含", 中国语文, (4), pp.300~307 (2005)
- 刘松江, "反问句的交际作用", 语言教学与研究, (2), pp.46~49 (1993)
- 유선영, "반어문의 의미, 화용상의 이해", 중국어문학논집, (39), pp.81~106 (2006), 중국어문학연구회
- 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2005), 송산출판사
- 刘钦荣, "反问句和询问句句法结构间的关系", 沈阳师范学院学报, (4), pp.85~88 (1995)
- 殷樹林, "現代漢語反問句硏究", 박사, pp.2006
- 이범열, "현대중국어의 담화화용론" (2012), 한국문화사
- 李彦凤, "否定焦點考察", 语文学刊, (5), pp.131~133 (2007)
- 李宇明, "反问句的構成及其理解", 殷都学刊, (3) (1990)
- 張曉濤, "疑問和否定的相通性及構式整合硏究" (2011), 中國社科學出版社
- 丁聲樹, "現代漢語語法講話" (2009), 商務印書館
- 정희자, "반어에 대한 화행적 고찰", 새한영어영문학, 46(3), pp.289~311 (2004), 새한영어영문학회
- 제바스티안 뢰브너, "의미론의 이해" (2010), 한국문화사
- 陳昌來, "從“有疑而問”到“無疑而問”―疑問句語法手段淺探", 煙台師範學院學報, (1) (1993)
- 湯廷池, "國語疑問句的硏究", 臺灣師大學報, 26, pp.219~277 (1981)
- 胡建华, "否定、焦點与辖域", 中国语文, (2), pp.99~112 (2007)
