일본은 왜 동아시아 정상회의를 선택했는가?: 경로의존성, 전략적 이익, 또는 지역정체성
Why Japan Selected East Asian Summit? Path Dependence, Strategic Interests, and Identity
3
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 논문은 동아시아 공동체 발전에 큰 함의를 갖는 EAS의 형성과정에서 보여준 일본의 입장을 사례로 구성주의 이론의 적실성이 동아시아 지역주의의 형성과정에 한정되며 그 심화과정에는 지역인식의 경로의존성과 전략적 계산이 보다 큰 역할을 하였음을 보이는 것이 목적이다. 일본은 EAS 협상과정에서 회원국을 미국, 호주, 뉴질랜드, 인도 등 비동아시아권 국가들에게도 개방할 것을 주장하였고 EAS가 출범한 2005년 이후에는 의식적으로 APT보다 EAS를 동아시아 공동체 추진의 주체로 간주하고 있다. 이 논문은 EAS의 설립과정을 통해서 일본은 APT 중심의 동아시아 정체성을 공식적으로 받아들이지 않았을 뿐 아니라 오히려 지난 수십 년 간 견지해 왔던 미국, 아시아-태평양 그리고 동남아시아를 중심으로 하는 전통적 지역정책의 틀을 유지하는 경로의존적 관성(path dependent inertia)을 보여주었으며 이는 중국 견제라는 전략적 목표와도 일치하였기 때문에 일본의 EAS 선호에 결정적 영향을 미쳤다는 것이 중심주장이다.
Abstract
The theoretical purpose of this essay is to examine that the relevance of constructivist analysis of East Asian cooperation is limited to the process of the formation of East Asian regionalism and that the understanding of the deepening process of it need to be assisted by the considerations of path dependence and strategic interests of Japanese foreign relations. The key argument of this article is that 1) the negotiation process of the construction of EAS demonstrated that Japan had never adopted the identity of East Asia based on the ASEAN+3, 2) that Japan stuck to the path dependent inertia of the traditional regional policy, and 3) that such inertia was in line with the strategic interests of Japan to balance against Chinese influence.
참고문헌 (44)
- 김기석, "일본의 동아시아 지역주의전략: ASEAN+3,EAS 그리고 동아시아 공동체", 국가전략, 14(1), pp.61~90 (2007), 세종연구소
- 김기석, "동아시아 지역협력의 현황과 한국의 전략", 국제문제연구, 9(4), pp.213~258 (2009), 국가안보전략연구소
- 김기석, "일본의 동아시아 공동체 정책" (2010), Typescript
- 김기석, "동아시아의 새로운 공동체 구상" (2010), 일본공간
- 배긍찬, "동아시아 정상회의 개최문제" (2005), 미래전략연구원
- 외교통상부, "동아시아 공동체와 우리의 입장: 동아시아 정상회의 추진동향, 한국경제신문 2010", 04, pp.2005, ~
- 東アジア共同体の夢と現実, "伊藤憲一", 祍団法人アジア親善交流協会講演, ~ (2005)
- 伊藤憲一, "東アジア共同体と日本の針路" (2005), NHK出版
- 西口淸勝, "東アジア共同体の講簗" (2006), ミネルバ書房
- "日本経済新聞 2005", 07, pp.2005, ~
- Beeson, Mark, "ASEAN Plus Three and the Rise of Reactionary Regionalism", Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(2) (2003)
- Bowles, Paul, "Asia’s Post-Crisis Regionalism: Bringing the State Back In, Keeping the (United) States Out", Review of International Political Economy, 9(2) (2002)
- Crone, Donald, "Does Hegemony Matter? The Reorganization of the Pacific Political Economy", World Politics, 45(4) (1993)
- Fukushima, Akiko, "Japan’s Perspective on Asian Regionalism. in: Asia’s New Multilateralism: Cooperation, Competition, and the Search for Community" (2009), Columbia University Press
- Grieco, Joseph, "Realism and Regionalism: American Power and German and Japanese Institutional Strategies During and After the Cold War. in: Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War" (1999), Columbia University Press
- Haggard, Stephen, "Regionalism in Asia and the Americas. in: The Political Economy of Regionalism" (1997), Columbia University Press
- Harris, Stuart, "Asian Multilateral Institutions and Their Response to the Asian Economic Crisis: The Regional and Global Implication", The Pacific Review, 13(3) (2000)
- Hemmer, Christopher, "Why There Is No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism", International Organization, 56(3) (2002)
- Higgot, Richard, "The Asian Economic Crisis: A Study in the Politics of Resentment", New Political Economy, 3(3) (1998)
- Katzenstein, Peter J., "Network Power: Japan and Asia" (1997), Cornell University Press
- Lincoln, Edward J., "East Asian Economic Regionalism" (2004), Brookings Institution
- Malik, Mohan, "The East Asia Summit", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 60(2) (2006)
- Maswood, Javed S., "Japan and East Asian Regionalism" (2001), Routledge
- East Asia Summit and India, "Muni, S. D.", ~, pp.ISAS Working Paper 13 (2006)
- Nabers, Dirk, "The Social Construction of International Institutions: The Case of ASEAN+3", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 3 (2003)
- Oon, Clarissa, "West Is Welcome in ASEAN Plus 3", Straits, 1 (2005)
- Pempel, T.J., "Transpacific Torii: Japan and the Emerging Asian Regionalism. in: Network Power: Japan and Asia" (1997), Cornell University Press
- Ravenhill, John, "A Three Bloc World? The New East Asian Regionalism", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2 (2002)
- Japan’s Policies Towards the Asia-Pacific Region: Continuities Amidst Change?, "Ravenhill, John", Center for Japanese Research, University of British Columbia, ~ (2002)
- Santis, Hugh de, "The Dragon and the Tigers: China and Asian Regionalism", World Policy Journal, 4 (2005)
- Stubbs, Richard, "ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism", Asian Survey, 42(3) (2002)
- Tanaka, Hiroshi, "The ASEAN+3 and East Asia Summit: A Two-Tiered Approach to Community Building", East Asia Insights, (1) (2006)
- Tanaka, Hiroshi, "Japan’s Policy Agenda for East Asia", East Asia Insight, 2(4) (2007)
- Terata, Takeshi, "Constructing an‘ East Asian’Concept and Growing Regional Identity: From EAEC to ASEAN+3", The Pacific Review, 16(2) (2003)
- Thorny Progress in the Institutionalization of ASEAN+3: Deficient China-Japan Leadership and the ASEAN Divide for Regional Governance, "Terata, Takashi", ~ (2004)
- East Asian Summit: Issues for Congress, "Vaughn, Bruce", CRS, ~ (2005)
- Webber, Douglas, "Two Funerals and a Wedding? The Ups and Downs of Regionalism in East Asia and Asia-Pacific After the Asian Crisis", The Pacific Review, 14(3) (2001)
- Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka, "Political Leadership, Informality, and Regional Integration in East Asia: The Evolution of ASEAN Plus Three", English Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(2) (2005)
- "Chairman’s Statement of the 4th East Asian Summit" (2009), Cha-am Hua Hin
- "Final Report of the East Asia Study Group"[URL]
- "Report of the East Asia Vision Group"[URL]
- Japan and ASEAN in East Asia: A Sincere and Open Partnership, "Koizumi, Junichiro", Prime Minister of Japan Junichiro Koizumi, ~ (2002)
- Issue Papers Prepared by the Government of Japan, "MOFA", Typescript, ~ (2004)
- Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the East Asia Summit, , Kuala Lumpur, ~ (2005)