후설의 판단중지 개념과 디자인학의 현상학적 방법론 연구

Abstract

(Background and Purpose)Under the empirical scientific influence of the nineteenth century, attempts to incorporate human values ​​into the practical logic of design studies are still continuing. For this, the design action should be replaced by the domain of conceptual exchange from the value of the product. If so, what methodological perspective is needed to implement the design process? This study is to show that it is important to accept phenomenological epistemology for the completion of design behavior. It is to establish Husserl 's phenomenological viewpoint (attitude) as a methodology of recognizing the relationship between design behavior, human and object (space), and to form it as the theoretical form of design science. It is also an attempt to construct a system of phenomenological epistemology in the field of design science. (Method) After analyzing the phenomenological viewpoints related to qualitative research according to the change of design perception, Husserl 's phenomenological attitude and the concept of epoché are examined. In order to derive the epistemological orientation required for design behavior, it reveals a mutual similarity with Husserl’s phenomenological practical logic. The phenomenological methodology of design processes is summarized together with the theoretical orientation and suggests the part to be continuously discussed. This study covers the general scope of design behavior. Of these, it is focused particularly on understanding and conceptualizing problems in the design process. (Results) After recognizing and understanding design issues, the process of conceptualization required the dynamic production of text. In addition, the process of conceptualizing in language had to be executed through epoch. Verbal Externalization through phenomenological epistemology allowed phenomenological thinking and insight into conceptual features for design behavior. In addition, phenomenological epistemology toward design behavior has become a domain of discourse through the connection of these meanings and interpretations. (Conclusions) First, it was possible through phenomenological interpretation to express the conceptual features of humans and objects in the correct language as the reason for their existence. Second, the process of diagnosing, understanding, and conceptualizing problems was key, away from the existing perception that the design process was focused on problem resolution. Third, the act of viewing and interpreting design epistemology from a phenomenological perspective was regarded as the association of semantic creation and interpretation of the relationship between all things, human and mutual phenomena . In the future, in order to structure phenomenological practical logic into design epistemology, it is necessary to concentrate narrative elements in the ideation process.