공동체주택의 지속가능성 평가요소의 집단 간 가중치 비교

Abstract

(Background and Purpose) Community housing, a novel housing typology, will contribute to the reduction of homogeneity in the housing market and increasing diversity and flexibility. It is essential to consider these community housing projects in the context of sustainable development, rather than as isolated instances. In addition, community housing represents a distinctive housing type, wherein residents assume a pivotal role throughout the entire process, from the initial planning stages to post-occupation operations and management. Therefore, when approaching community housing, it is imperative to comprehensively examine the awareness and needs of not only experts but also residents. In this context, the purpose of this study is to analyze the discrepancies in perceived relative importance between experts and residents based on the sustainability evaluation factors of community housing , in order to facilitate the continued sustainable growth of community housing. (Method) In this study, a survey was conducted using the AHP method. Specifically, a decision hierarchy was established based on the items and classification system of the community housing sustainability assessment model. The relative importance and weight of each item were then calculated through pairwise comparisons between each item. Afterwards, the discrepancies in awareness between the two groups were evaluated and analyzed, with the focus on the significance of each item by classifying them into two distinct groups: experts and residents. Based on this classification, priorities were derived. (Results) In terms of priority of weighting of the evaluation fields, both expert groups and resident groups identified social sustainability as the most significant item. Additionally, there were some notable discrepancies in awareness between the two groups. The residents demonstrated a pragmatic and realistic approach to sustainability, particularly in terms of economic sustainability. Conversely, experts exhibited a comparatively lower level of awareness regarding the significance of ​​economic sustainability in comparison to the residents. Notably, while the expert group placed a high value on community management, the residents emphasised conflict management and support, including interpersonal relationships with other residents and an awareness of the community, over systematic support such as operational rules or regulations. (Conclusions) It is essential to identify and acknowledge divergent perspectives within the group while simultaneously attending more assiduously to the opinions and requirements of residents with respect to sustainability within the community. Furthermore, it is vital to solicit expert insights from a long-term and macroscopic perspective. The input of experts can be instrumental in determining the overall trajectory community housing expansion, while the perspectives of residents can be pivotal in ensuring the establishment of community housing in a sustainable manner.