AHP 방법론을 적용한 FMEA 치명도 평가 사례연구
Evaluation of RPN in FMEA with AHP Method : Case Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Failure mode and effects analysis(FMEA) is popular approach applied to examine potential failures in equipment designs and maintenance of equipments. Risk Priority Number(RPN) is used as an index for the criticality of fault modes in FMEA and RCM(reliability centered maintenance). Traditional RPN approach does not have much credit as a index for the criticality because it does not reflect their experience and the governing logic is apart from their knowledge. Multiple Criteria Decision Method(MCDM) is a proven approach applied to evaluate multiple conflicting criteria in decision making. MCDM can be applied as a tool for RPN evaluation. This study was carried out to investigate application of Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP) in evaluating RPN.
Abstract
Failure mode and effects analysis(FMEA) is popular approach applied to examine potential failures in equipment designs and maintenance of equipments. Risk Priority Number(RPN) is used as an index for the criticality of fault modes in FMEA and RCM(reliability centered maintenance). Traditional RPN approach does not have much credit as a index for the criticality because it does not reflect their experience and the governing logic is apart from their knowledge. Multiple Criteria Decision Method(MCDM) is a proven approach applied to evaluate multiple conflicting criteria in decision making. MCDM can be applied as a tool for RPN evaluation. This study was carried out to investigate application of Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP) in evaluating RPN.
참고문헌 (17)
- Anil Sharma, "A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimization", Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17(1) (2011)
- 배춘익, "FMEA를 이용한 공기공급시스템의 신뢰성 분석", 한국기계기술학회지, 12(4), pp.205~210 (2010), 한국기계기술학회[DOI]
- Rishav K., "Failure mode and effect analysis of Petrol Engine of car", International Journal of Science and Research, 7 (2017)
- Gilchrist W, "Modelling failure modes and effects analysis", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 10 (1993)
- Braglia M., "Multi-attribute failure mode analysis", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17 (2000)
- Dinohammadi F., "A fuzzy-FMEA Risk Assessment Approach for offshore wind Turbines", International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 13 (2013)
- Liu H., "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy measure and Fuzzy Integral", Symmetry, 9 (2017)
- Liu H. C., "Failure mode and effect analysis using cloud model theory and PROMETHEE method", IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 66 (2017)
- Ben-Daya, Abdul Raouf, "A revised failure mode and effects analysis model", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13 (1996)
- Maheswaran K., "A novel approach for prioritization of failure modes in FMEA using MCDM", International Journal of Engineering and Applications, 3 (2013)
- Yang T., "Risk identification and quantitative evauation method for Asset Integrity Management of offshore platform equipment and facilities", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019 (2019)
- Dimas C. A., "An AHP application to evaluate scoring criteria for FMEA", International Journal of the analytic Hierarchy process, 2 (2010)
- Shafiee M., "Maintenance strategy selection problem-an MCDM overview", Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 21 (2015)
- Brans, J., "Preference Ranking Organization Method(the PROMETHEE Method for Multi Criteria Decision-making", Management Science, 31(6) (1985)
- Hwang C.L., "Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Methods and Applications" (1981)
- Saaty T. H., "How to make a decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1990)
- Vargas L. G, "An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications", European Journal of Operational Research, 26 (1990)