본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

위험 요인 평가를 위한 FMEA의 일반 RPN 모형과 활용에 관한 연구

A Study on the Common RPN Model of Failure Mode Evaluation Analysis(FMEA) and its Application for Risk Factor Evaluation

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a widely utilized technique to measure product reliability by identifying potential failure modes. Even though FMEA techniques have been studied, the form of Risk Priority Number (RPN) used to evaluate risk priority in FMEA is still questionable because of its shortcomings. In this study, we suggest common RPN(cRPN) to resolve shortcomings of the traditional RPN and show the extensibility of cRPN. Methods: We suggest cRPN which is based on Cobb-Douglas production function, and represent the various application on weighting risk factors, weighted RPN in a mathematical way, and show the possibility of statistical approach. We also conduct numerical study to examine the difference of the traditional RPN and cRPN as well as the potential application from the analysis on marginal effects of each risk factor. Results: cRPN successfully integrates previously suggested approaches especially on the relative importance of risk factors and weighting RPN. Moreover, we analyze the effect of corrective actions in terms of econometric analysis using cRPN. Since cRPN is rely on the reliable mathematical model, there would be numerous applications using cRPN such as smart factory based on A.I. techniques. Conclusion: We propose a reliable mathematical model of RPN based on Cobb-Douglas production function. Our suggested model, cRPN, resolves various shortcomings such as consideration of the relative importance, the effect of combinations among risk factors. In addition, by adopting a reliable mathematical model, quantitative approaches are expected to be applied using cRPN. We find that cRPN can be utilized to the field of industry because it is able to be applied without modifying the entire systems or the conventional actions.

Abstract

Purpose: Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a widely utilized technique to measure product reliability by identifying potential failure modes. Even though FMEA techniques have been studied, the form of Risk Priority Number (RPN) used to evaluate risk priority in FMEA is still questionable because of its shortcomings. In this study, we suggest common RPN(cRPN) to resolve shortcomings of the traditional RPN and show the extensibility of cRPN. Methods: We suggest cRPN which is based on Cobb-Douglas production function, and represent the various application on weighting risk factors, weighted RPN in a mathematical way, and show the possibility of statistical approach. We also conduct numerical study to examine the difference of the traditional RPN and cRPN as well as the potential application from the analysis on marginal effects of each risk factor. Results: cRPN successfully integrates previously suggested approaches especially on the relative importance of risk factors and weighting RPN. Moreover, we analyze the effect of corrective actions in terms of econometric analysis using cRPN. Since cRPN is rely on the reliable mathematical model, there would be numerous applications using cRPN such as smart factory based on A.I. techniques. Conclusion: We propose a reliable mathematical model of RPN based on Cobb-Douglas production function. Our suggested model, cRPN, resolves various shortcomings such as consideration of the relative importance, the effect of combinations among risk factors. In addition, by adopting a reliable mathematical model, quantitative approaches are expected to be applied using cRPN. We find that cRPN can be utilized to the field of industry because it is able to be applied without modifying the entire systems or the conventional actions.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Abdelgawad M, "Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), pp.1028~1036 (2010)
  2. AIAG, "FMEA Handbook", ~ (2019)
  3. Ben‐Daya M, "A revised failure mode and effects analysis model", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (1996)
  4. Bevilacqua M, "Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant", Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 16(4), pp.313~324 (2000)
  5. Bowles J, "An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis", Journal of the IEST, 47(1), pp.51~56 (2004)
  6. Bowles JB, "Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50(2), pp.203~213 (1995)
  7. Braglia M, "Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (2003)
  8. Braglia M., "MAFMA: multi‐attribute failure mode analysis", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (2000)
  9. Carlson C, "Effective FMEAs: achieving safe, reliable, and economical products and processes using failure mode and effects analysis. Vol. 1" (2012), John Wiley & Sons
  10. Carmignani G, "An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA : The priority-cost FMECA", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(4), pp.861~871 (2009)
  11. Chang K-H, "Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method", Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(2), pp.113~129 (2011)
  12. Cheng ML, "A modified Cobb–Douglas production function model and its application", IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 25(3), pp.353~365 (2014)
  13. Chin K-S, "Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis", Decision Support Systems, 48(1), pp.246~256 (2009)
  14. Cobb CW, "A theory of production", The American Economic Review, 18(1), pp.139~165 (1928)
  15. Filz M-A, "Data-driven failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA)to enhance maintenance planning", Computers in Industry, 129, pp.103451~ (2021)
  16. Fussell J., "A new methodology for obtaining cut sets for fault trees", Trans Am Nucl Soc (1972)
  17. Garcia PA, "A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA", Progress in Nuclear Energy, 46(3-4), pp.359~373 (2005)
  18. Gargama H, "Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic", IEEE transactions on Reliability, 60(1), pp.102~110 (2011)
  19. Hossain MM, "An Application of Non–Linear Cobb-Douglas Production Function to Selected Manufacturing Industries in Bangladesh", Open Journal of Statistics, 2(04), pp.460~ (2012)
  20. Jang JS, "How to Perform FMEA Effectively", Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 25(1) (1997)
  21. 김병남, "FMEA에서 공통원인고장이 포함될 경우의 고장원인에 대한 위험평가 절차", 품질경영학회지, 46(2), pp.327~338 (2018), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  22. 김상연, "가전용 모터의 FMEA 실시 과정에서의 RPN 평가방법 재정립", 품질경영학회지, 35(1), pp.1~9 (2007), 한국품질경영학회
  23. Kutlu AC, "Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP", Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), pp.61~67 (2012)
  24. Liu H-C, "Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory", Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), pp.4403~4415 (2011)
  25. Liu H-C, "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment", Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), pp.12926~12934 (2012)
  26. Liu H-C, "Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis : A literature review", Expert systems with applications, 40(2), pp.828~838 (2013)
  27. Liu H-C, "FMEA using uncertainty theories and MCDM methods", pp.13~27 (2016), Springer
  28. Military U., "Procedure for performing a failure mode effect and criticality analysis", United States military procedure MIL-P-1629, ~ (1949)
  29. Mohanty AR, "Machinery condition monitoring: Principles and practices" (2014), CRC Press
  30. NASA., "Procedure for Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)", Office of manned space flight, Apollo program, Apollo Reliability Quality Assurance Office, ~ (1966)
  31. Sharma RK, "Integrated framework to optimize RAM and cost decisions in a process plant", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25(6), pp.883~904 (2012)
  32. Stamatis DH, "Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution" (2003), Quality Press
  33. Wälder K, "Methoden zur Risikomodellierung und des Risikomanagements" (2017), Springer
  34. Wang Y-M, "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean", Expert systems with applications, 36(2), pp.1195~1207 (2009)
  35. Xiao N, "Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA", Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(4), pp.1162~1170 (2011)
  36. Yang Z, "Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA", IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 57(3), pp.517~528 (2008)
  37. Yazdi M, "A reliable risk analysis approach using an extension of best-worst method based on democratic-autocratic decision-making style", Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, pp.120418~ (2020)
  38. Zammori F, "ANP", RPN : A multi criteria evaluation of the risk priority number, 2012, pp.28(1), 85~104
  39. Zheng D, "Future Information Engineering and Manufacturing Science", Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Future Information Engineering and Manufacturing Science (FIEMS 2014), 2 (2014), CRC Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)