본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해적대처의 법적 쟁점과 입법방향 검토 - 일본 해적대처법의 입법 배경 및 시사점을 중심으로 -

Legal Issue and Legislative Directions on Pirates - The Legislative Intent and Implication of Japan's Anti-piracy Measures Law -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Marine transportation which is done through sea lanes is under serious threat aspiracy activities have been largely increased. United Nations, through its SecurityCouncil resolution, requested countries to deploy its naval ships, and 30 countriesresponded to the request. On this regard, Republic of Korea has passed the motion forROK military deployment to Somalia in March 2009, which has allowed the ChunghaeTask Force to be deployed up until this day. In January 2011, the Chunghae TaskForce took judicial process on the pirates that were taken to Korea for custody afterbeing captured by the “Operation Dawn of Gulf of Aden”. There were no problems inthe judicial process on the pirates, but the raised problems during the whole processwere that there were no specific law on piracy and regulation ensuring the rights ofour deployed military to conduct anti-piracy actions. Recently the Korea Coast Guard has brought up the issue on which service issubjected to take actions on piracy as the problems were raised during the judicialprocess on the captured pirates. The Korea Coast Guard is insisting that they are themain service for handling the pirates by referencing the model employed by the JapanCoast Guard for handling pirates, currently the Korea Coast Guard is in process ofproposing a legislation by Assembly members for to establish a special law which canprovide clarification. But, this is causing a heated debate as the services andinstitutions which are currently conducting piracy operations are against it. This writing is to examine the occurrence of piracy and each nation’s way of actionon piracy; diagnose the Republic of Korea’s legislative system and the necessity ofestablishing a special law; and also to investigate on the necessity and directions onthe legislation regarding piracy by understanding the background of Japan’santi-piracy measures law.

Abstract

Marine transportation which is done through sea lanes is under serious threat aspiracy activities have been largely increased. United Nations, through its SecurityCouncil resolution, requested countries to deploy its naval ships, and 30 countriesresponded to the request. On this regard, Republic of Korea has passed the motion forROK military deployment to Somalia in March 2009, which has allowed the ChunghaeTask Force to be deployed up until this day. In January 2011, the Chunghae TaskForce took judicial process on the pirates that were taken to Korea for custody afterbeing captured by the “Operation Dawn of Gulf of Aden”. There were no problems inthe judicial process on the pirates, but the raised problems during the whole processwere that there were no specific law on piracy and regulation ensuring the rights ofour deployed military to conduct anti-piracy actions. Recently the Korea Coast Guard has brought up the issue on which service issubjected to take actions on piracy as the problems were raised during the judicialprocess on the captured pirates. The Korea Coast Guard is insisting that they are themain service for handling the pirates by referencing the model employed by the JapanCoast Guard for handling pirates, currently the Korea Coast Guard is in process ofproposing a legislation by Assembly members for to establish a special law which canprovide clarification. But, this is causing a heated debate as the services andinstitutions which are currently conducting piracy operations are against it. This writing is to examine the occurrence of piracy and each nation’s way of actionon piracy; diagnose the Republic of Korea’s legislative system and the necessity ofestablishing a special law; and also to investigate on the necessity and directions onthe legislation regarding piracy by understanding the background of Japan’santi-piracy measures law.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 해적피해방지를 위한 해운업계 역량강화 및 국제협력 제고방안 연구, "국토해양부", 국토해양부, ~ (2012)
  2. 남해지방해양경찰청, "삼호주얼리호 해적사건 수사백서" (2011), 남해지방해양경찰청
  3. 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)" (2008), 박영사
  4. 배종대, "형법각론" (2010)
  5. 부산지방법원, "소말리아 해적 사건 국민참여재판 백서" (2012), 세종문화사
  6. 신호진, "형법요론" (2012), 문형사
  7. 이재상, "형법각론" (2010), 박영사
  8. 해군본부 헌병단, "해적처리 실무" (2012), 해군본부
  9. 김석균, "韓․中․日 해양보안(Maritime Security) 의 입법적 수용에 대한 비교론적 고찰", 국제.지역연구, 21(3), pp.63~91 (2012), 국제학연구소
  10. 김영철, "해적행위 현황과 해양경찰의 역할 강화 방안에 관한 연구", 자치경찰연구, 4(2) (2011)
  11. 해적피해방지를 위한 법률 정비방안, "목진용", 한국해양수산개발원, ~ (2010)
  12. 박병식, "해적대책의 법체계와 입법방향에 관한 연구", 경찰학논총, 6(1), pp.379~398 (2011), 경찰학연구소
  13. 박영선, "국군부대의 소말리아 해역파병 특례법에 관한 연구", 해사법연구, 21(1), pp.273~313 (2009), 한국해사법학회
  14. 이석용, "해적행위 처벌 등에 관한 법률에 관한 분석과 제안", 해적처리특별법 제정을 위한 국회세미나 발제문 (2013)
  15. 이세련, "국제법상 해적행위 처벌을 위한 집행조치의 효율성에 관한 고찰 -소말리아 해역의 해적행위를 중심으로-", 성균관법학, 24(2), pp.673~696 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  16. 소말리아 해적에 대한 형사재판의 쟁점과 개선방안, "최민영", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2011)
  17. 최진태, "소말리아 해적에 대한 조직 및 기술적 대응방안", Crisisonomy, 7(5), pp.165~182 (2011), 위기관리 이론과 실천
  18. 국방협력과 국익증진 지원을 위한 파병의 법적 타당성 연구, "한국법제연구원", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2013)
  19. 해적행위 처벌 등에 관한 법률 제정에 대한 연구, "한국형사정책연구원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2012)
  20. 함혜연, "해적사건 수사상 해경-해군 공조수사효율화 방안", 한국해양경찰학회보, 2(2), pp.105~128 (2012), 한국해양경찰학회
  21. 황인수, "해적행위에 대한 처벌상의 문제점과 개선방안", 성균관법학, 22(2), pp.183~218 (2010), 법학연구소
  22. 강종구, "해양경찰청, 해적처리특별법 제정 추진", 연합뉴스, ~ (2013)
  23. 강종구, "취임 100일 김석균 해경청장, 안전한 바다 조성", 연합뉴스, ~ (2013)
  24. 청해부대 5진 귀국 보고서, "국방대학교 PKO센터", 국방대학교 PKO센터, ~ (2011)
  25. 김재영, "소말리아해적, 1년 간 한 척의 선박도 납치하지 못해…EU", 뉴시스, ~ (2013)
  26. 김철환, "다양한 임무 참여로 해외파병 도약 이뤄야", 국방일보, ~ (2013)
  27. 신소연, "첩보영화 방불…한국저력 유감없이 발휘", 헤럴드경제, ~ (2011)
  28. 윤병노, "해적피해 제로…선박 안전호송 퍼펙트 신화", 국방일보, ~ (2014)
  29. NC1S, "Guide For Investigation Acts of Maritime Piracy", NCIS, ~ (2011)
  30. 防衛智識普及会, "海賊対策-海上警備行動と海賊対処法案-" (2009), 內外出版
  31. 富賀見栄一, "海上保安庁進化論" (2009), シ―ズ· プラニング
  32. 日本海洋政策硏究財団, "海洋白書2010" (2010), 海洋政策硏究財団
  33. 竹田いさみ, "世界を動かす海賊" (2013), 筑摩書房
  34. 土井全二郞, "現代の海賊-ビジネス化する無法社会-" (2004), 成山堂書店
  35. 稻本守, "ソマリア沖海賊問題と海賊対処をめぐる一考察", Journal of the Tokyo of Marine Science and Technology, 7 (2011)
  36. 笹本浩, "ソマリア沖·アデン湾における海賊対策としての法整備-海賊対処法案の槪要と國会論議-", 立法と調査, (295) (2009)
  37. "LLOYD'S RISK INDEX 2013"[URL]
  38. "CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF CRIMES OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS"[URL]
  39. 防衛省, "防衛白書2012" (2012), 防衛省·自衛隊
  40. "ソマリア沖派兵と海賊対処法"[URL]
  41. 요미우리 신문 사설, "차기 정권과 일본, 전략적 외교로 상호 손실을 벗어나야", 요미우리 신문, ~ (2013)
  42. "海上自衛隊のソマリア沖派兵に強抗議し, 海賊対処法に斷固反対する声明"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)