구한말 검찰제도의 연혁과 사법경찰관과의 상호관계 연구
A Study on History of Prosecutor and Interrelationship between Prosecutor and Judicial Police Officer at the end of Chosun Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During the Gabo Reform time, the Korean Empire and the Japanese Resident-General ofKorea, although it was confused, the Chosun dynasty tried to save the independence andexperienced the frustration throughout the failure because of the introduction ofmodernized police, prosecutor and justice system etc. by the Japan’s forced pressure. After Gabo Reform, the prosecutor system was not established yet in the 1894 - 1895. 3. So during this period, Gyeongmusa of the Gyeongmu Office carried out the prosecutor'sjobs including the investigation today. But after the prosecutor system was established in the Court Organization Act of Marchin 1895 and until Korea-Japan were annexed in 1910, the prosecutor was consistently thepresiding officer of the investigation and had the right to command to the judicial policeofficer. This system of the investigation continues even today. Under current law, the interrelationship between prosecutor and judicial police officer isthe relationship abuse could thrive. But when talking about the investigation system or theinterrelationship of prosecutor and judicial police officer, the discussions about therelationship abuse could thrive between prosecutor and judicial police officer in thecontinental law system or the cooperation relationship between prosecutor and judicialpolice officer in the Anglo-American Law system were of no significance at least in theend of Chosun dynasty in a history of laws. Because our intention was not reflectedabsolutely in choosing the system of the investigation. So when you consider the background that Japan introduced the criminal justice systemto facilitate its colonial rule in Korea, the interrelationship that was set at that timebetween prosecutor and judicial police officer should not be taken as a matter of courseeven now. In brief, I measure that you stop to think a directing point about the desirablerelationship for both organizations, taking into account the introduction purposes of thissystem and legal provisions and the historical background.
Abstract
During the Gabo Reform time, the Korean Empire and the Japanese Resident-General ofKorea, although it was confused, the Chosun dynasty tried to save the independence andexperienced the frustration throughout the failure because of the introduction ofmodernized police, prosecutor and justice system etc. by the Japan’s forced pressure. After Gabo Reform, the prosecutor system was not established yet in the 1894 - 1895. 3. So during this period, Gyeongmusa of the Gyeongmu Office carried out the prosecutor'sjobs including the investigation today. But after the prosecutor system was established in the Court Organization Act of Marchin 1895 and until Korea-Japan were annexed in 1910, the prosecutor was consistently thepresiding officer of the investigation and had the right to command to the judicial policeofficer. This system of the investigation continues even today. Under current law, the interrelationship between prosecutor and judicial police officer isthe relationship abuse could thrive. But when talking about the investigation system or theinterrelationship of prosecutor and judicial police officer, the discussions about therelationship abuse could thrive between prosecutor and judicial police officer in thecontinental law system or the cooperation relationship between prosecutor and judicialpolice officer in the Anglo-American Law system were of no significance at least in theend of Chosun dynasty in a history of laws. Because our intention was not reflectedabsolutely in choosing the system of the investigation. So when you consider the background that Japan introduced the criminal justice systemto facilitate its colonial rule in Korea, the interrelationship that was set at that timebetween prosecutor and judicial police officer should not be taken as a matter of courseeven now. In brief, I measure that you stop to think a directing point about the desirablerelationship for both organizations, taking into account the introduction purposes of thissystem and legal provisions and the historical background.
참고문헌 (24)
- 국회도서관, "통감부법령자료집 下" (1973), 유성인쇄주식회사
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅰ" (1970), 서울인쇄주식회사
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅱ" (1971), 유성인쇄주식회사
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅲ" (1971), 유성인쇄주식회사
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅳ" (1971), 서울대학교 출판부
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅴ" (1971), 서울대학교 출판부
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅵ" (1971), 서울대학교 출판부
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅶ" (1971), 서울대학교 출판부
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅷ" (1972), 서울대학교 출판부
- 국회도서관, "한말근대법령자료집Ⅸ" (1972), 서울대학교 출판부
- 경찰대학, "경찰학개론" (1999), 대한문화사
- 경찰대학, "한국경찰사" (1988), 미진문화사
- 심희기, "한국법제사강의" (1997), 삼영사
- 도면회, "갑오개혁기 형사법규의 개혁", 규장각, (21) (1998), 서울대학교 규장각 한국학연구원
- 도면회, "갑오·광무연간의 재판제도", 역사와 현실, (14) (1994), 한국역사연구회
- 도면회, "규장각 소장 법부관련 자료의 내용과 자료적 가치", 규장각, (26) (2003), 서울대학교 규장각 한국학연구원
- 都冕會, "1894-1905년간 형사재판제도 연구", 박사, 국사학, pp.1998
- 문준영, "한국 검찰제도의 역사적 형성에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2004
- 송해은, "한국검찰의 연혁에 관한 고찰", 저스티스, 27(2)통권 : 37 (1994), 한국법학원
- 양홍준, "대한제국 후기(1905-1910) 경찰제도 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.2007
- 유승희, "法部 <起案>의 자료적 성격과 특징", 서지학연구, (43), pp.289~319 (2009), 한국서지학회
- 이완규, "검사의 지위에 관한 연구 : 형사서법체계와의 관련성을 중심으로", 박사, 법학, pp.2005
- 임준태, "한국 근대경찰사 小考", 한국공안행정학회보, 19(4), pp.373~414 (2010), 한국공안행정학회
- "중앙일보 2015년 3월 4일자", ~
