警察行政調査와 搜査의 區別 - 告發을 豫定한 行政調査와 犯罪搜査와의 關係-
The Distinction Between Police-Administrative Investigation and Criminal Investigation
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This report is for the better understanding about the difference betweenPolice-Administrative Investigation and Criminal Investigation by comparing eachother. The Police-Administrative Investigation is the pre-research of Police Agencies inorder to keep the public peace and oder by preventing dangers. On the other hand,Criminal investigation is the performance of law enforcement Agencies for prosecution. Also they can be distinguished in three points such as goal, means and right toinvestigate. The benefits distinguishing both of them are making decisions whether thecriminal procedures should be applied or not, and if applied, how intensive they couldbe applicable. Police-Administrative investigation should be under the control of criminalprocedures if it has substantially the natures of criminal investigation. Because theconstitutional law ensures the Principle of Due process. Therefor it is illegal to doPolice-administrative investigation under the purpose of criminal investigation withoutany warrant or notification of right to remain silent. The Administrative Action decided by illegal Police-Administrative investigation canbe canceled. And The evidences collected through illegal Police-Administrativeinvestigation will be excluded according to Exclusionary Rule. Finally the evidencesderived from evidences collected illegally will be excluded according to fruit of thepoisonous tree Rule also.
Abstract
This report is for the better understanding about the difference betweenPolice-Administrative Investigation and Criminal Investigation by comparing eachother. The Police-Administrative Investigation is the pre-research of Police Agencies inorder to keep the public peace and oder by preventing dangers. On the other hand,Criminal investigation is the performance of law enforcement Agencies for prosecution. Also they can be distinguished in three points such as goal, means and right toinvestigate. The benefits distinguishing both of them are making decisions whether thecriminal procedures should be applied or not, and if applied, how intensive they couldbe applicable. Police-Administrative investigation should be under the control of criminalprocedures if it has substantially the natures of criminal investigation. Because theconstitutional law ensures the Principle of Due process. Therefor it is illegal to doPolice-administrative investigation under the purpose of criminal investigation withoutany warrant or notification of right to remain silent. The Administrative Action decided by illegal Police-Administrative investigation canbe canceled. And The evidences collected through illegal Police-Administrativeinvestigation will be excluded according to Exclusionary Rule. Finally the evidencesderived from evidences collected illegally will be excluded according to fruit of thepoisonous tree Rule also.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" (2013), 법문사
- 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" (2012), 박영사
- 김철용, "행정법Ⅰ" (2012), 박영사
- 박종수, "행정법신론 제15판" (2011), 박영사
- 박균성, "행정법강의 제10판" (2013), 박영사
- 박윤흔, "최신행정법강의(상)" (2004), 박영사
- 손재영, "경찰법 - 경찰법의 기본체계와 이론적 기초 -" (2012), 박영사
- 신동운, "신형사소송법(제4판)" (2012), 법문사
- 유길준, "서유견문" (2012), 서해문집
- 이상규, "영미행정법" (2011), 법문사
- 이상돈, "조세형법론" (2009), 세창출판사
- 홍정선, "경찰행정법제2판" (2010), 박영사
- 홍정선, "행정법특강" (2012), 박영사
- 홍준형, "행정법" (2011), 법문사
- Aurelius Augustinus, "고백록" (2013), 동서문화사
- 宇賀克也, "行政法概説Ⅰ(제4판)" (2011), 有斐閣
- 구승모, "자본시장법상 불공정거래행위 수사 현황 및 개선방안- 불공정거래행위에 대한 과징금 도입논의와 관련하여 -", 법조, 61(7), pp.54~109 (2012), 법조협회[DOI]
- 이세화, "진술거부권불고지와 증거의 증거능력 - 대법원 2009. 3. 12. 선고 2008도11437 판결 -", 법학논총, 18(3), pp.87~110 (2011), 법학연구원
- 임선화, "행정조사의 법적 한계", 석사, 법학, pp.2007
- 박병욱, "위험예방을 위한 경찰법과 범죄진압을 위한 형사법의 목적․수단상 몇 가지 차이점: 경찰의 활동을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 23(3), pp.199~231 (2012), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박지현, "행정상 진술거부권과 그 제한", 민주법학, (33), pp.289~316 (2007), 민주주의법학연구회
- 박혜림, "수사단계의 적법절차원리에 대한 고찰 -사실상 수사로서의 행정조사를 중심으로-", 법학논총, 20(2), pp.581~608 (2013), 법학연구원
- 백창현, "경찰상 조사의 법적한계에 관한 소고", 치안정책연구, (18) (2004)
- 서정범, "행정경찰에의 초대- 경찰작용의 Paradigm Shift -", 경찰학연구, 12(4), pp.193~210 (2012), 경찰대학
- 이근우, "사실상 수사로서 행정조사의 형사절차적 한계", 석사, 법학, pp.2004
- 이근우, "자본시장법상 조사 제도의 형사법적 문제점", 안암법학, (40), pp.453~483 (2013), 안암법학회
- 이재방, "적법절차에 따르지 않고 수집된 증거의 증거능력에 대한 고찰", 홍익법학, 12(1), pp.347~376 (2011), 법학연구소
- 임지봉, "適法節次條項의 우리 헌법에의 導入과 그 運用", 헌법학연구, 11(3), pp.263~301 (2005), 한국헌법학회
- 전수진, "행정조사제도에 관한 연구 : 수사절차와의 관계 및 미국법과의 비교를 중심으로", 석사, 법학과 행정법전공, pp.2013
- 須藤陽子, "行政調査に関する一考察", 立命館法学, (4) (2008)
- 渋谷樹, "食品偽装表示における行政調査と犯罪捜査との競合", 社会技術論文集, 9 (2012)
- 川出敏裕, "行政警察活動と捜査", 法学教室, 259 (2002)