본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

행정조사와 특별사법경찰관리의 수사의 경계획정 - 특별사법경찰관리의 직무를 중심으로 -

Delimitation between Administrative Investigation and Investigation of Special Judicial Police - Focused on the Function of Special Judicial Police -

0

조회

0

다운로드

23

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The special judicial police officer means the official who is granted the status and the authority of the judicial police officer among administrative police in a narrow sense to investigate a crime and to arrest the perpetrators in relation to administrative acts. The spirit of the special judicial police management system is to achieve the purpose of seamless quick investigation on the basis of competent professionalism and urgency of assignment task. The special judicial police officer also holds the status as an administrative official, he has the administrative investigation right by the 「Framework Act on Administrative Investigation」 or by an individual Administrative Law. When he performs duties, the administrative investigation of the special judicial police officer, especially the powerful and compulsory investigation in Police Act meets with the investigation activity on the borderline. When the special judicial police officer check law violations in an administrative investigation for purposes of administrative police or regulation, investigation process is initiated. In this case there are many issues that need to be explained, such as the doctrine of warrants, right to remain silent, yes or no of force etc. in powerful and compulsory investigation in Police Act and in administrative investigation to check law violation. Moreover, if the administrative official had the status of the special judicial police officer and the investigation right, it is difficult to have a clear distinction between administrative investigation and investigation, therefore they are likely to operate the right of administrative investigation and the investigation right arbitrarily and arbitrarily. On the other hand, a simple prevention of prohibited conduct and management have a character of administrative law, an administrative investigation to check law violation is the investigation activity, therefore dues process of law should be applied in such an administrative investigation. This distinction is important, because it depends on the legal nature of the applicable law and the legal principle so that it should be able to provide a legal probability of prediction and means for protection of a right. Therefore, in order to solve this phenomenon of mixed duties due to the double status, the organizational independence should be guaranteed at least by installing and operating a special judicial police organization in organization Act. In law of action, the procedural discipline density should be increased like that of the 「Criminal Procedure Act」 in the powerful and compulsory investigation, and in the administrative investigation of criminal prosecution, or none but the official who is granted the status and the authority of the judicial police officer should perform administrative investigation and investigation.

Abstract

The special judicial police officer means the official who is granted the status and the authority of the judicial police officer among administrative police in a narrow sense to investigate a crime and to arrest the perpetrators in relation to administrative acts. The spirit of the special judicial police management system is to achieve the purpose of seamless quick investigation on the basis of competent professionalism and urgency of assignment task. The special judicial police officer also holds the status as an administrative official, he has the administrative investigation right by the 「Framework Act on Administrative Investigation」 or by an individual Administrative Law. When he performs duties, the administrative investigation of the special judicial police officer, especially the powerful and compulsory investigation in Police Act meets with the investigation activity on the borderline. When the special judicial police officer check law violations in an administrative investigation for purposes of administrative police or regulation, investigation process is initiated. In this case there are many issues that need to be explained, such as the doctrine of warrants, right to remain silent, yes or no of force etc. in powerful and compulsory investigation in Police Act and in administrative investigation to check law violation. Moreover, if the administrative official had the status of the special judicial police officer and the investigation right, it is difficult to have a clear distinction between administrative investigation and investigation, therefore they are likely to operate the right of administrative investigation and the investigation right arbitrarily and arbitrarily. On the other hand, a simple prevention of prohibited conduct and management have a character of administrative law, an administrative investigation to check law violation is the investigation activity, therefore dues process of law should be applied in such an administrative investigation. This distinction is important, because it depends on the legal nature of the applicable law and the legal principle so that it should be able to provide a legal probability of prediction and means for protection of a right. Therefore, in order to solve this phenomenon of mixed duties due to the double status, the organizational independence should be guaranteed at least by installing and operating a special judicial police organization in organization Act. In law of action, the procedural discipline density should be increased like that of the 「Criminal Procedure Act」 in the powerful and compulsory investigation, and in the administrative investigation of criminal prosecution, or none but the official who is granted the status and the authority of the judicial police officer should perform administrative investigation and investigation.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 김남진, "행정법 Ⅰ" (2014), 법문사
  2. 김남진, "행정법 Ⅱ" (2014), 법문사
  3. 김성수, "일반행정법 - 행정법이론의 헌법적 원리 -" (2014), 홍문사
  4. 김중권, "김중권의 행정법" (2014), 법문사
  5. 대검찰청, "특별사법경찰 수사실무", ~ (2013)
  6. 박균성, "행정법강의 제10판" (2013), 박영사
  7. 박균성, "행정법론(상)" (2014), 박영사
  8. 유길준, "서유견문 : 조선지식인 유길준, 서양을 번역하다" (2005), 서해문집
  9. 이상돈, "조세형법론, - 조세범처벌의 형사실무와 형법이론적 제한 -" (2009), 세창출판사
  10. 홍정선, "행정법원론(하)" (2014), 박영사
  11. Franz-Ludwig Knemeyer, "경찰법 사례연구, - 독일이론을 중심으로 -" (2001), 고시연구원
  12. 고문현, "미국의 환경사법경찰", 토지공법연구, 43(3), pp.735~752 (2009), 한국토지공법학회
  13. 김남욱, "警察上의 調査에 관한 法的問題", 토지공법연구, 33, pp.179~206 (2006), 한국토지공법학회
  14. 김민규, "특별사법경찰제도의 공법적 고찰 : 일반행정기관에의 '사법경찰권' 부여에 관한 법치국가적 타당성 검토", 석사, 법학, pp.2009
  15. 김영조, "미국 행정법상 행정조사의 법리에 관한 고찰", 토지공법연구, 21, pp.159~184 (2004), 한국토지공법학회
  16. 김영조, "행정조사기본법의 문제점과 개선방안", 공법학연구, 8(3), pp.89~122 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
  17. 김재광, "行政調査基本法 立法過程에 關한 考察", 법학논총, 33(2), pp.489~516 (2009), 법학연구소
  18. 박정훈, "컴퓨터프로그램보호법상 단속처분 및 행정조사법제의 문제점과 개선방안", 행정법연구, 10, pp.1~14 (2003), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
  19. 박현준, "특별사법경찰활동의 절차적 정당성 구현: 미란다 경고의 고지를 중심으로", 한국치안행정논집, 10(2), pp.1~22 (2013), 한국치안행정학회
  20. 박혜림, "수사단계의 적법절차원리에 대한 고찰 -사실상 수사로서의 행정조사를 중심으로-", 법학논총, 20(2), pp.581~608 (2013), 법학연구원
  21. 백창현, "경찰상 조사의 법적 한계에 관한 소고", 치안정책연구, (18) (2004), 치안정책연구소
  22. 백창현, "특별사법경찰의 현황 및 개선방안 - 환경부와 국가보훈처를 중심으로 -", 형사정책연구, 18(4), pp.277~312 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  23. 변재옥, "행정조사의 개념을 위한 시론", 고시연구 (1981), 고시연구사
  24. 서정범, "행정경찰에의 초대- 경찰작용의 Paradigm Shift -", 경찰학연구, 12(4), pp.193~210 (2012), 경찰대학
  25. 신현기, "제주자치경찰단 특별사법경찰제의 실태분석과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 한국경찰연구, 11(3), pp.143~170 (2012), 한국경찰연구학회
  26. 신현기, "철도특별사법경찰제의 실태분석과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 한국민간경비학회보, 11(1), pp.45~70 (2012), 한국민간경비학회
  27. 양재진, "한국 행정국가화 현상의 권력구조적 동기와 기반", 한국행정학회 하계학술대회 발표논문집 (2001), 한국행정학회
  28. 오명신, "警察行政調査와 搜査의 區別 - 告發을 豫定한 行政調査와 犯罪搜査와의 關係-", 경찰학연구, 14(1)통권 : 37, pp.167~191 (2014), 경찰대학
  29. 오병두, "특별사법경찰관리제도에 관한 소고", 강원법학, 27, pp.63~89 (2008), 비교법학연구소
  30. 吳峻根, "“행정조사”의 공법이론적 재검토", 공법연구, 31(3), pp.23~23 (2003), 한국공법학회
  31. 오준근, "행정조사제도의 법리적 논의․입법동향의 평가와 개선방향에 관한 연구", 토지공법연구, 45, pp.359~382 (2009), 한국토지공법학회
  32. 이근우, "특별사법경찰제의 체계적 통일성을 위한 기초연구", 안암법학, (35), pp.183~213 (2011), 안암법학회
  33. 이근우, "행정조사의 형사법적 한계설정", 고려법학, (72), pp.351~387 (2014), 법학연구원
  34. 이근우, "행정형법의 재구성 : 개념, 구조, 절차", 박사, 법학, pp.2008
  35. 이기춘, "행정법상 행정단속에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 33(1), pp.295~325 (2013), 법학연구소
  36. 주성진, "식품범죄 실태 및 대응체계 문제점 분석을 통한 정책적 제언:식품사범 단속체계를 중심으로", 한국공안행정학회보, 22(3), pp.355~390 (2013), 한국공안행정학회
  37. 최준혁, "제주자치경찰과 국가경찰과의 협력방안 - 특별사법경찰제도를 중심으로 -", 경찰법연구, 11(1), pp.197~219 (2013), 한국경찰법학회
  38. 경기도 특별사법경찰단, "2013 경기도 특별사법경찰단 활동성과", ~ (2014)
  39. 특사경전담조직 활성화 방안에 관한 연구, "박경래", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구총서 12-AB-05 (2012)
  40. 행정조사의 실태와 개선방안 - 규제개혁 차원의 접근을 중심으로-, "신종익", 한국경제연구원, ~ (2004)
  41. 광역자지단체 특별사법경찰의 운영개선방안, "이현우", 경기개발연구원, ~, pp.정책연구 2013-13 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)