1930년대 소설과 생태적 담론 : 자연을 통한 구원의 가능성을 중심으로
In the 1930s the Novel and Ecological Discourse : Focusing on the possibility of redemption by the nature
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the ecological reasons, the performance of the Korean literature that claims to support the construction of the new ecological society can be discussed in depth by targeting works of later 70s and 80s. However, this study tried to figure the ecological recognition of the Korean literature in 30s as retroacting such periods. Even though the period is when ecological recognitions or ecological discourses in genuine means may not be developed, humans cannot avoid having an organic relationship with the nature in an attribute of the literature. Moreover, in such relationship, it is too natural to include values and topics that ecological literatures are claiming to support. Because of these reasons, the writer chose short novels of LEE Hyoseok, San, Deul , and Seonghwangdang of JEONG Biseok which were published in 1930s. Moreover, the study tried to figure the directions of the ecological discourses included in these novels, and what specialties made them to be included in the range of the ecological literature. LEE Hyoseok and JEONG Biseok wanted to recover the irrationality and abnormality of human lives through the life characteristics of the nature. It can assume the start of the ecological reasons from the recognition that nature is the place to heal the wounds got from humans. Besides, their novels are ecological in the point where presenting healthy sexual images to recover primitive vitality and to open the possibility or redemption. This is because the harmonized sex of human and nature, and sex that meets natural quality pursue life than death and recovery than severance as it recovers human lives together with reacting as a new redemption. Therefore, even the ecological discourses of the Korean novels do not directly mention environmental issues, however, its qualitative performance can be evaluated whether it includes vitality, which is the quality of the nature, and the possibility of redemption. With these reasons, the novels of Lee Hyoseok and JEONG Biseok in the 30s are possible to have ecological discourses.
Abstract
Based on the ecological reasons, the performance of the Korean literature that claims to support the construction of the new ecological society can be discussed in depth by targeting works of later 70s and 80s. However, this study tried to figure the ecological recognition of the Korean literature in 30s as retroacting such periods. Even though the period is when ecological recognitions or ecological discourses in genuine means may not be developed, humans cannot avoid having an organic relationship with the nature in an attribute of the literature. Moreover, in such relationship, it is too natural to include values and topics that ecological literatures are claiming to support. Because of these reasons, the writer chose short novels of LEE Hyoseok, San, Deul , and Seonghwangdang of JEONG Biseok which were published in 1930s. Moreover, the study tried to figure the directions of the ecological discourses included in these novels, and what specialties made them to be included in the range of the ecological literature. LEE Hyoseok and JEONG Biseok wanted to recover the irrationality and abnormality of human lives through the life characteristics of the nature. It can assume the start of the ecological reasons from the recognition that nature is the place to heal the wounds got from humans. Besides, their novels are ecological in the point where presenting healthy sexual images to recover primitive vitality and to open the possibility or redemption. This is because the harmonized sex of human and nature, and sex that meets natural quality pursue life than death and recovery than severance as it recovers human lives together with reacting as a new redemption. Therefore, even the ecological discourses of the Korean novels do not directly mention environmental issues, however, its qualitative performance can be evaluated whether it includes vitality, which is the quality of the nature, and the possibility of redemption. With these reasons, the novels of Lee Hyoseok and JEONG Biseok in the 30s are possible to have ecological discourses.
참고문헌 (14)
- 이효석, "이효석전집2" (2003), 창미사
- 이효석, "이효석전집6" (2003), 창미사
- 이효석, "이효석전집8" (2003), 창미사
- 정비석, "한국현대대표소설선5" (1996), 창작과비평사
- 김성진, "생태문제와 인문학적 상상력", pp.37~84 (1999), 나남출판
- 김용민, "생태사회를 위한 문학", 현대문학, pp.159~191 (2000)
- 김욱동, "문학 생태학을 위하여" (1998), 민음사
- 박이문, "더불어 사는 인간과 자연" (2001), 미다스북스
- 신덕룡, "초록 생명의 길―에코토피아를 위한 시론", pp.10~27 (1997), 시와사람사
- 이상옥, "인간, 성 그리고 자연-이효석론", 인문논총, 20, pp.22~27 (1988), 서울대인문학연구소
- 이상섭, "애욕문학으로서의 특질-이효석의 작품세계(1)", 문학사상, 17, pp.290~293 (1974), 문학사상사
- 이진우, "문화로서의 자연-생태문학의 철학적 의미", 현대문학, pp.200~207 (2000)
- 장양수, "한국현대문학사", pp.204~218 (1994), 현대문학
- Carl G. Herndle, "Green Culture: Environmental Rhetoric in Contemporary America", pp.10~12 (1996), University of Wisconsin Press