中日 학자 비평을 통해 본 臺山의 학문적 입장 一考察

Abstract

Deasan Kim mea-sun red books extensively covering all sort of books of the day, through it, he made a minute diagnosis of academic world of Chosun. Although he was moralist and confucianist, he researched and took study more flexibly, in this process he remained 『Kwoulyeosanpil』 describing his thinking freely six volumes and three books. Kim kwi-sun(1793-1869), Deasan’s cousin, evaluated deasan’s this excellent work (『Kwoulyeosanpil』) ‘These several tens of chapters are the essential of 『Mummokpyobo』『Yugo』’ - Frankly speaking, it is no exaggeration to say that this remarks cover the whole volume of 『Kwoulyeosanpil』. There are criticisms on scholars more than ten scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty including 顧炎武, 陸隴其, 阮元 Japanese scholar 太宰純. All of them had considerable influence on academic world of the Ming⋅Ching Dynasty and Japan, Deasan remained short criticism, it was impression criticism, almost he pointed out their academic quality of them very sharply and criticize logically. This thesis researched point of view and thought of later Chosun’s confucian scholars on the bibliographical study, Buddhism the philosophy of Wang Yang-ming, through the criticism of Deasan on the scholars of the Mign⋅Ching Dynasty and Japan.