臺山의 反擬古論이 지닌 經學的 성격 －考證學에 대한 朱子學的 대응을 중심으로－

Abstract

Daesan's discussion which put stress on sentence of the day(當代文章) is connected feature as the study of Confucian classics(經學), which is response to the study of ancient documents documental archaeology, especially in the view of the doctrines of Chu-tzu. In Chosun dynasty, it was universal that literary theory was formed on the base of the study of confucian classics. But actually the case of which literary logic and study of confucian classics' logic are connected closely was not common like Daesan. Especially, in the 19C's literature and study, Daesan's theory of prose which is set off from response to the study of ancient documents documental archaeology(考證學) is the important point. And in a narrow sense, there are important points in regard to his own anguish and extension of thinking. Daesan criticized attitude that the scholars who claim to ancient sentences imitate only sentences and pretend antique style. But he didn't downplay or oppose studying ancient sentences, preferably he advised to learn former ancient sentences deeply to learn sentences of Tang and Sung (唐宋). This was formed on the sense that sentences are changed and advanced according to the times. According to the flow of Daesan's logics, the conclusion is drawn that Tang and Sung (唐宋)'s ancient sentences are merely premise. These Daesan's thinking and the literary theory are derived from the feature as the study of confucian classics, which is response to the study of ancient documents, documental archaeology. The archaeological scholars respected exegetics of Han dynasty, so attacked the doctrines of Chu-tzu strongly. So, what was worse, they claim that the doctrines of Chu-tzu is not confucianism but Buddhism's logic. But Daesan's thought was different. He thought that study is changed and advanced according to the times, so the doctrines of Chu-tzu developed confucianism by borrowing concept words from Buddhism and Laozi·Chuangzi philosophy, doing philosophical arguments and studying theory. And he insisted that the doctrines of Chu-tzu contributed to establishing confucianism's mind and excluding cult, that is the long-cherished wish since Confucius. He insisted that all these contributions and services can't be denied on the basis of only several sentences. Eventually, his criticism to the study of ancient documents, documental archaeology is rejection to schematic and formal doctrines of Chu-tzu. And he raised questions about impure academic attitude which is hidden intention that ignore doctrines of Chu-tzu's contributions and achievements and acquire one's own academic authority. So, in studying the doctrines of Chu-tzu., he showed open mind that accept methodology of study of ancient documents documental archaeology. Going one step forward, in creating literature, this thought was connected to the logic that all the words can be borrowed as well as Buddhism's books or the books above confucianism. This thought acted as the base of Daesan's literal theory that object to ancient style and emphasize on sentence of the day.