본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Quintus Ennius’ Literary Activities and the Roman State

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Quintus Ennius contributed greatly to the development of Latin literature. He is, however, often called a ‘client󰠏poet’. This coined word, reminiscent of a ‘flatterer󰠏poet’ of later Roman republic, does not match with Ennius in many points. Ennius maintained close relationships with many leading elites. He did not lodge in patron’s domus, living independently. Above all, he wrote his works not just to praise his patrons, but to defend the cause of Roman state. Latin literature started to develop in earnest in the middle of Roman republic. At that time, Roman republic was developing into Mediterranean empire and in the expanded world, the old leading Roman elites had to compete with new rivals to keep their hegemony. They wanted to make use of Latin literature to fortify their traditional authority agitated by new rivals. Ennius met their demand. Though Ennius praised in his works certain elites such as Scipio Africanus and Marcus Fulvius Nobilior, he did it for the cause of Roman state. Ennius’ major work, Annales, shows clearly this nationalistic feature of Latin literature in middle of Roman Republic.

Abstract

Quintus Ennius contributed greatly to the development of Latin literature. He is, however, often called a ‘client󰠏poet’. This coined word, reminiscent of a ‘flatterer󰠏poet’ of later Roman republic, does not match with Ennius in many points. Ennius maintained close relationships with many leading elites. He did not lodge in patron’s domus, living independently. Above all, he wrote his works not just to praise his patrons, but to defend the cause of Roman state. Latin literature started to develop in earnest in the middle of Roman republic. At that time, Roman republic was developing into Mediterranean empire and in the expanded world, the old leading Roman elites had to compete with new rivals to keep their hegemony. They wanted to make use of Latin literature to fortify their traditional authority agitated by new rivals. Ennius met their demand. Though Ennius praised in his works certain elites such as Scipio Africanus and Marcus Fulvius Nobilior, he did it for the cause of Roman state. Ennius’ major work, Annales, shows clearly this nationalistic feature of Latin literature in middle of Roman Republic.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. A.J. Dunston, "Essays on Roman Culture" (1976)
  2. E. Gabba, "Rome and Italy in the Second Century B.C, In CAH 2nd ed. Vol. 8: Rome and the Mediterranean to 133 B.C", pp.197~243 (1989)
  3. E.S. Gruen, "Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy" (1990)
  4. E.S. Gruen, "The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome" (1984)
  5. T.N. Habinek, "The Politics of Latin Literature: writing, identity, and empire in ancient Rome" (1998)
  6. S. Harrison, "A Companion to Latin Literature" (2006)
  7. M.K. Hopkins, "Conquerors and Slaves, Sociological Studies in Roman History 1" (1978)
  8. H.D. Jocelyn, "The Poems of Quintus Ennius, In ANRW 1. 2" (1972)
  9. T. Mommsen, "Römische Geschichte, I" (1881)
  10. N. Rosenstein, "A Companion to the Roman Republic" (2006)
  11. H.H. Scullard, "Roman Politics, 220-150 BC" (1973)
  12. O. Skutch, "The Annals of Quintus Ennius" (1985)
  13. E.H. Warmington, "Remains of Old Latin, Vol. I" (1967)
  14. 차전환, "그리스 문화에 대한 노카토 (Marcus Porcius Cato)의 태도", 서양고대사연구, (28), pp.181~206 (2011), 한국서양고대역사문화학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)