나보니두스의 정치, 종교적 행적(行蹟)과 그 배경
Nabonidus’ Socio-political Behavior and its Backgrounds
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The regnal years of Nabonidus, the last king of the Neo-Babylonian dynasty, have received the attention of several scholars, for many aspects of his reign seem to be uncommon - his long stay in Taima which was located far from his capital, the real nature of Belshazzar’s rule in Babylon during his absence, people’s reaction to the fall of Babylon, and his religious preference to the Moon-god, Sîn. Among the historical sources for his reign, the Verse Account reflects the conflict of Nabonidus with the Babylonian Elites, especially in religious matters. It describes the injustice of Nabonidus’ rule, people’s discontent toward him, his possession of devils, displeasure of Marduk toward him, derisive remark about his neglect of religious rites, and welcome of Cyrus by the Babyulonians as a liberator. Even though this could be exploited by the Persian post eventum for denouncing the conquered king, it could be hardly considered as a total invention differently from the historical events. In this paper, therefore, I have searched its possible reasons through investigating Nabonidus’ personal backgrounds and his deeds during the reign. It is well known that Nabonidus had interest in the past like other Neo-Babylonian kings, but he seems to be more pious to the old tradition, particularly to the Assyrian tradition in connecting his reign to those of the former Assyrian kings. Nabonidus possibly followed an Assyrian paradigm by using the same titulary as of Assyrian kings, while Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar made efforts to forge a model of Babylonian imperial rule by avoiding Assyrian imperial idioms consciously, and it is quite probable that Nabonidus attempted to follow and revive the Assyrian concepts and models of reign, but centered in Babylon. Nabonidus’ religious proclivity and his favour to Harran could be understood in this regard, since there remain the records for several Neo-Assyrian kings’ personal concerns for the cult of Sîn of Harran, whether out of personal devotion or as a political maneuver. This, as well as the possible fact that Nabonidus had the Aramaic background shown in his stay at Taima may have influenced his religious favor to the Moon-god Sîn and his long stay at Taima. Assyria and Babylonia had been the two representative forces in ancient Mesopotamia. For the most of the seventh century BC, however, Babylonia was under Assyrian domination, until Nabopolassar liberate it. During that period of oppression, the Babylonians have suffered from several invasions and plunders by the Assyrian. The evidences show that Nabonidus was closely related to Harran which was heavily Assyrianized in the seventh century, which reveals him having the Aramaic and Assyrian background. His favor to the Moon-god over Marduk and his interest in Assyrian traditions seem to be somewhat excessive to the eye of the Babylonians. This might remind the Babylonians of an unpleasant past. In these circumstances, the conflict between Nabonidus and the Babylonian elites, who are presented as priests in the Verse Account, would be unavoidable.
Abstract
The regnal years of Nabonidus, the last king of the Neo-Babylonian dynasty, have received the attention of several scholars, for many aspects of his reign seem to be uncommon - his long stay in Taima which was located far from his capital, the real nature of Belshazzar’s rule in Babylon during his absence, people’s reaction to the fall of Babylon, and his religious preference to the Moon-god, Sîn. Among the historical sources for his reign, the Verse Account reflects the conflict of Nabonidus with the Babylonian Elites, especially in religious matters. It describes the injustice of Nabonidus’ rule, people’s discontent toward him, his possession of devils, displeasure of Marduk toward him, derisive remark about his neglect of religious rites, and welcome of Cyrus by the Babyulonians as a liberator. Even though this could be exploited by the Persian post eventum for denouncing the conquered king, it could be hardly considered as a total invention differently from the historical events. In this paper, therefore, I have searched its possible reasons through investigating Nabonidus’ personal backgrounds and his deeds during the reign. It is well known that Nabonidus had interest in the past like other Neo-Babylonian kings, but he seems to be more pious to the old tradition, particularly to the Assyrian tradition in connecting his reign to those of the former Assyrian kings. Nabonidus possibly followed an Assyrian paradigm by using the same titulary as of Assyrian kings, while Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar made efforts to forge a model of Babylonian imperial rule by avoiding Assyrian imperial idioms consciously, and it is quite probable that Nabonidus attempted to follow and revive the Assyrian concepts and models of reign, but centered in Babylon. Nabonidus’ religious proclivity and his favour to Harran could be understood in this regard, since there remain the records for several Neo-Assyrian kings’ personal concerns for the cult of Sîn of Harran, whether out of personal devotion or as a political maneuver. This, as well as the possible fact that Nabonidus had the Aramaic background shown in his stay at Taima may have influenced his religious favor to the Moon-god Sîn and his long stay at Taima. Assyria and Babylonia had been the two representative forces in ancient Mesopotamia. For the most of the seventh century BC, however, Babylonia was under Assyrian domination, until Nabopolassar liberate it. During that period of oppression, the Babylonians have suffered from several invasions and plunders by the Assyrian. The evidences show that Nabonidus was closely related to Harran which was heavily Assyrianized in the seventh century, which reveals him having the Aramaic and Assyrian background. His favor to the Moon-god over Marduk and his interest in Assyrian traditions seem to be somewhat excessive to the eye of the Babylonians. This might remind the Babylonians of an unpleasant past. In these circumstances, the conflict between Nabonidus and the Babylonian elites, who are presented as priests in the Verse Account, would be unavoidable.
참고문헌 (24)
- Julius Lewy, "The Late AssyroBabylonian Cult of the Moon and its Culmination at the Time of Nabonidus", HUCA, 19 (1945)
- C. J. Gadd, "The Harran Inscriptions of Nabonidus", Anatolian Studies, 8, pp.35~92 (1958)
- Hayim Tadmor, "Treaty and Oath in the Ancient Near East: A Historian’s Approach", Humanizing America’s Iconic Book, 127~152 (1982)
- A. K. Grayson, "Babylonian Historical Literary Texts", pp.104~111 (1975), Toronto
- A. Kuhrt, "Nabonidus and the Babylonian Priesthood", Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World, ~141 (1990)
- James B. Pritchard, "Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament", pp.312~315 (1969), Third Edition with Supplement; Princeton
- I. Eph’al, "The Ancient Arabs: Nomads on the Borders of the Fertile Crescent 9th-5th Centuries B.C.", pp.182~185 (1984), Jerusalem
- S. Smith, "Babylonian Historical Texts", pp.27~97 (1975), Hildesheim
- A. Kuhrt, "The Ancient Near East, Vol. II", pp.~592 (1995), London
- Paul-Alain Beaulieu, "The Reign of Nabonidus, King of Babylon 556-539 BC", pp.556~539 (1989), New Haven
- R. P. Dougherty, "Nabonidus and Belshazzar", pp.~74 (1929), New Haven
- P. Beaulieu, "King Naonidus and the NeoBabylonian Empire", Civilizations of the Ancient Near East, II, pp.~974 (1995)
- Lewy, "The Late AssyroBabylonian Cult of the Moon and its Culmination at the Time of Nabonidus", ~407
- A.K.Grayson, "Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles", pp.107~ (1970), TCS V; Locust Valley: J.J. Augustin
- J. M. Munn-Rankin, "Diplomacy in Western Asia in the Early Second Millennium B.C", Iraq, 18, pp.~91 (1956)
- Simo Parpola, "The Correspondence of Sargon II, Part I: Letters from Assyria and the West", pp.187~203 (1987), State Archives of Assyria, Volume I, Helsinki
- Simo Parpola, "The Correspondence of Sargon II, Part I: Letters from Assyria and the West", pp.187~203 (1987), State Archives of Assyria, Volume I, Helsinki
- W.W. Hallo, "The Ancient Near East: A History", pp.146~147 (1998), Revised Edition, Fort Worth
- E. Lipiński, "The Aramaeans: Their Ancient History, Culture, Religion", pp.429~437 (2000), Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta 100, Leuven
- E. A. Knauf, "Tema", Anchor Bible Dictionary, VI, pp.346~347 (1992)
- W. F. Albright, "The Conquest of Nabonidus in Arabia", Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, ~294 (1925)
- Irving Finkel, "The Hanging Gardens of Babylon", The Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, 38~58 (1988)
- David Stephen Vanderhooft, "The Neo-Babylonian Empire and Babylon in the Latter Prophets", pp.~56 (1999), HSM 59, Atlanta
- B. Landsberger, "Die Basaltstele Nabonids von Eski-Harran", Halil Edhem Hâtira Kitabi, I, pp.~149 (1947)
