본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공학교육인증제와 과학 기술 글쓰기

The Accreditation for Engineering Educations and the Writing for scientific technology

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper is dealing with the writing of scientific technique which is currently working on for engineering students. Recently, by operating the Accreditation for Engineering Educations in earnest, the disoriented operation of liberal education is presented as the point at issue, this related criticism is generating frequently. Various debates surrounding the true meaning of Accreditation for Engineering Education and liberal Education are highlighting up two core problems related to ‘Writing Training’. First is whywriting is the core for the liberal education, it is just related to the issues of true meaning during the process of the writing of engineering certification. Even in the disoriented operating speed of the liberal education, this is it that ‘Writing’ will be the question why Engineering Certification is in the location as an important part. And second is what is desirable ‘Writing‘ education for engineering students, it is related to the problems the way to improve the scientific writing. The writing materials for the scientific writing currently are based on two fields; one is on the area of ‘Practical Writing’ and another is on the area of ‘Academic Writing’. The legitimate alternatives about his discussion will be what to know what it is. After considering the issues of Accreditation for Engineering Educations in Korea where is focused on the propensity of the outcomes-oriented approach, this paper is groping for the solutions about two problems related to the writing presented previously.

Abstract

This paper is dealing with the writing of scientific technique which is currently working on for engineering students. Recently, by operating the Accreditation for Engineering Educations in earnest, the disoriented operation of liberal education is presented as the point at issue, this related criticism is generating frequently. Various debates surrounding the true meaning of Accreditation for Engineering Education and liberal Education are highlighting up two core problems related to ‘Writing Training’. First is whywriting is the core for the liberal education, it is just related to the issues of true meaning during the process of the writing of engineering certification. Even in the disoriented operating speed of the liberal education, this is it that ‘Writing’ will be the question why Engineering Certification is in the location as an important part. And second is what is desirable ‘Writing‘ education for engineering students, it is related to the problems the way to improve the scientific writing. The writing materials for the scientific writing currently are based on two fields; one is on the area of ‘Practical Writing’ and another is on the area of ‘Academic Writing’. The legitimate alternatives about his discussion will be what to know what it is. After considering the issues of Accreditation for Engineering Educations in Korea where is focused on the propensity of the outcomes-oriented approach, this paper is groping for the solutions about two problems related to the writing presented previously.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 고강옥, "「교수직 걸고 문사철 교양교육 살리겠다」,『교수신문』, 2007. 11. 05", ~ (2007)
  2. 김민정, "이공계생을 위한 글쓰기 교육의 방법론과 운영에 대한 연구", 한국문학이론과 비평, 11(1), pp.221~245 (2007), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  3. 김상길, "「공학교육인증 교양교육 어떻게 보나」,『교수신문』, 2007. 11. 13", ~ (2007)
  4. 김재호, "‘공학인증제’와 교양교육-서울대학교 ‘과학과 기술 글쓰기’ 교과내용 개선의 필요성을 중심으로-", 철학사상, (28), pp.53~71 (2008), 철학사상연구소
  5. 신동호, "글 잘쓰는 과학자가 성공할 확률 높다", 과학동아, pp.113~ (2002)
  6. 신선경, "과학기술자를 위한 글쓰기 교육의 새로운 방향", 작문연구, (7), pp.35~58 (2008), 한국작문학회
  7. 오윤선(吳侖鮮), "理工系 大學生을 對象으로 한 글쓰기 敎授法의 方向", 어문연구(語文硏究), 34(4), pp.427~448 (2006), 한국어문교육연구회
  8. 유미현, "과학 잡지를 활용한 수업이 과학 비전공 고등학생들의 과학에 대한 태도 및 과학자에 대한 이미지에 미치는 영향", 교육과정평가연구, 10(1), pp.211~230 (2007), 한국교육과정평가원
  9. 이경수, "Havard와 MIT의 글쓰기 교육 비교연구 in: 2007세계 속의 한국현대문학", 한국현대문학회 학술발표회발표논집, pp.112~ (2007)
  10. 이희원, "「시행착오에서 비롯된 오해......교양교육 강화공감」,『교수신문』, 2007. 11. 12", ~ (2007)
  11. 정희모, "MIT 대학 글쓰기 교육 시스템에 관한 연구", 독서연구, -(11), pp.327~356 (2004), 한국독서학회
  12. 최상민, "공학교육에서 문식성 학습목표 달성을 위한 글쓰기 수업모형", 국제어문, (45), pp.279~302 (2009), 국제어문학회
  13. 최재천, "글 못쓰는 이공계 보따리 싸라", 한겨레 21 (2005)
  14. 란다 플라워, "글쓰기 문제해결 전략" (1998), 동문선

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)