신화, 판타지, 팩션의 서사론과 가능세계
Narratology and Possible Worlds of Myth, Fantasy and Faction
0
조회
0
다운로드
44
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The myth as narrative has ambivalent nature of fantasy and mimesis which are two driving force of literature and art. Therefore myth shows a wide spectrum of the possible worlds in the narrative genre. In the perspective of theory of possible-world, myth offers a useful tools understanding the new narrative genre ; fantasy-narrative and faction. To understand possible worlds in narrative text, we should know the character and relationship of three worlds; the actual world(AW), the textual actual world(TAW), and the textual referential world(TRW). The myth has both a fictional feature and historical(real) feature. The myth is similar to fantasy-narrative in terms of the unrealistic. In other words, the events which took place in text are hard to accept as actual thing in the real world. But all myths have always said the origin of the actual incidents which are considered to be the natural by the numbers of community together. Therefore myth is no longer fiction, but nonfiction. That's what is the common nature of myth and faction. In brief, myth's the relationship of AW and TAW is similar to faction's, but myth's the relationship of AW and TRW is similar to fantasy's.
Abstract
The myth as narrative has ambivalent nature of fantasy and mimesis which are two driving force of literature and art. Therefore myth shows a wide spectrum of the possible worlds in the narrative genre. In the perspective of theory of possible-world, myth offers a useful tools understanding the new narrative genre ; fantasy-narrative and faction. To understand possible worlds in narrative text, we should know the character and relationship of three worlds; the actual world(AW), the textual actual world(TAW), and the textual referential world(TRW). The myth has both a fictional feature and historical(real) feature. The myth is similar to fantasy-narrative in terms of the unrealistic. In other words, the events which took place in text are hard to accept as actual thing in the real world. But all myths have always said the origin of the actual incidents which are considered to be the natural by the numbers of community together. Therefore myth is no longer fiction, but nonfiction. That's what is the common nature of myth and faction. In brief, myth's the relationship of AW and TAW is similar to faction's, but myth's the relationship of AW and TRW is similar to fantasy's.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김기봉, "팩션(faction)으로서 역사서술", 역사와경계, (63), pp.1~21 (2007), 부산경남사학회
- 김헌선, "한국의 창세신화-무가로 보는 우리의 신화" (1994), 길벗
- 김현식, "포스트모던 시대의 ‘역사란 무엇인가?’" (2006), 휴머니스트
- 박진, "역사추리소설의 장르적 성격과 한국적인 특수성", 현대소설연구, (32), pp.331~352 (2006), 한국현대소설학회
- 박진, "우리는 왜 팩션에 열광하는가", 문학과 사회, 75 (2005)
- 송태현, "판타지-톨킨, 루이스, 롤링의 환상 세계와 기독교" (2003), 살림
- 오세정, "신화의 가능세계와 의미론 : 가능세계의 특성과 관계를 중심으로", 시학과 언어학, (16), pp.207~225 (2009), 시학과언어학회
- 오세정, "민속학으로서의 구비문학의 정체성과 연구방향", 한국민속학, 47, pp.103~133 (2008), 한국민속학회
- 오세정, "한국 신화의 원형적 상상력의 구조. in: 설화와 상상력" (2008), 제이앤씨
- 이도흠, "상상력의 열림과 닫힘", 국어국문학, (146), pp.115~150 (2007), 국어국문학회
- 이도흠, "신화와 판타지-해방의 출구인가,억압의 장인가?", 문학과 경계 (2002)
- 임병희, "로고스의 영토,미토스의 지배-판타지소설과 온라인게임의 신화구조 분석-", 국제어문, 24 (2001), 국제어문학회
- 한기호, "왜 팩션인가?", 오늘의 문예비평, 65 (2007)
- 한혜원, "신화 퀘스트에 기반한 디지털 게임 스토리텔링 연구", 탐라문화, (34), pp.135~160 (2009), 탐라문화연구소
- Edmund Leach, "신화로서의 창세기" (1995), 파란나라
- Hayden White, "Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe" (1973), Johns Hopkins University
- J. Schniewind, "'Kerygma and Myth: a Theological Debate" (1953), S.P.C.K
- Kathryn Hume, "Fantasy and Mimesis-Responses to Reality in Western Literature" (1984), Methuen
- Liz Green, "신화와 점성학" (2000), 문학동네
- Lubomír Doležel, "Mimesis and Possible World", Poetics Today, 9(3) (1988)
- Maire-Laure Ryan, "Possible Worlds and Accessbility Relations: A Semantic Typology of Fiction", Poetics Today, 12(3) (1991)
- Paul Venye, "역사는 어떻게 쓰는가" (2004), 새물결
- Robert Scholes, "서사의 본질" (2001), 예림기획
- Rosemary Jackson, "Fantasy:The Literature of Subversion" (1981), Routledge
- Ruth Ronen, "Possible Worlds in Literary Theory" (1994), Cambridge University
- Tzbetan Todorov, "The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to Literary Genre, trans." (1973), Press of Case Western Reverse University