4.19세대의 주체성 정립과 민족문학론으로의 도정- 196,70년대 염무웅 비평론
A Study on Yeom, Mu-ung's Literary Criticism in 1960-70's
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study has searched the development process of Yeom, Mu-ung's criticism in the 1960-70's and its significance in the literary history. As a critic of 4.19 generation, he joined the quarterly literary magazine, 'Chang-bi' through the career as a coterie of 'Prose Generation', '68 Literature'. His criticism makes it possible to review that 4.19 spirit progressed to get its own literary issue as being dispersed into the same generation. While he investigated modernity on the base of Western literary theory in his early criticism, as he got to recognize the complexity of modern Korea, he began to view the literature in the aspect of historical sense. As he criticized the ideality of pure literary theory and the diagram of criticism in the post-war period, he began to seek the new principle of criticism and insisted the necessity of literature based on concrete reality by accepting Arnold Hauser's society of art. Yeom, Mu-ung's criticism in the 1960s, which reflects the record of incessant self-renewal, is the result of serious introspection on the relation between the literature and the reality of the times. Through this process, Yeom, Mu -ung took the place of a representative 'theory of national literature' in the 1970s.
Abstract
This study has searched the development process of Yeom, Mu-ung's criticism in the 1960-70's and its significance in the literary history. As a critic of 4.19 generation, he joined the quarterly literary magazine, 'Chang-bi' through the career as a coterie of 'Prose Generation', '68 Literature'. His criticism makes it possible to review that 4.19 spirit progressed to get its own literary issue as being dispersed into the same generation. While he investigated modernity on the base of Western literary theory in his early criticism, as he got to recognize the complexity of modern Korea, he began to view the literature in the aspect of historical sense. As he criticized the ideality of pure literary theory and the diagram of criticism in the post-war period, he began to seek the new principle of criticism and insisted the necessity of literature based on concrete reality by accepting Arnold Hauser's society of art. Yeom, Mu-ung's criticism in the 1960s, which reflects the record of incessant self-renewal, is the result of serious introspection on the relation between the literature and the reality of the times. Through this process, Yeom, Mu -ung took the place of a representative 'theory of national literature' in the 1970s.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강소연, "1960년대 사회와 비평문학의 모더니티" (2006), 역락
- 고명철, "논쟁,비평의 응전-순수참여 논쟁과 민족문학론의 쟁점들" (2006), 보고사
- 권보드래, "4월의 문학혁명, 근대화론과의 대결 -이청준과 방영웅, 『산문시대』에서『창작과비평』까지", 한국문학연구, (39), pp.269~312 (2010), 한국문학연구소
- 김영민, "한국현대문학비평사" (2000), 소명출판
- 김용락, "나의 스승, 시대의 스승" (2008), 솔과학
- 김윤식, "60년대 문학의 특질,운명과 형식" (1992), 솔
- 사회와 윤리(김현문학전집2), "현대한국문학의 이론", pp.1992, 김현
- 보이는 심연과 안 보이는 역사 전망(김현문학전집7), "분석과 해석", pp.1992, 김현
- 구운몽 - 최인훈 전집1, "해설 : 사랑의 재확인-『광장』 개작에 대하여 ,광장", pp.1993, 김현
- 서영인, "산문시대와 새로운 문학장의 맹아", 한국문학이론과 비평, 11(1), pp.273~296 (2007), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 서울대학교 동아문화연구소, "國語國文學事典" (1973), 신구문화사
- 천정환, "한국문학전집과 정전화: 한국문학전집사(초)", 현대소설연구, (37), pp.85~124 (2008), 한국현대소설학회
- 최원식, "4월혁명과 한국문학" (2002), 창작과비평사
- 최인훈, "문학과 이데올로기-최인훈 문학전집12" (2009), 문학과지성사
- 하상일, "1960년대 현실주의 문학비평 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 하상일, "김현의 비평과 문학과 지성 의 형성과정" (2007), 批評文學
- 한수영, "1950-60년대 비평의 전개 양상 , 신동욱 편저, 한국현대문학사" (2004), 집문당
- 홍기돈, ""68문학" 연구", 어문연구, 54, pp.505~527 (2007), 어문연구학회
- 홍진경, "한스 제들마이어 著 현대미술의 혁명", 현대미술사연구, 7 (1997)
- Arnold hauser, "문학과 예술의 사회사4" (2006), 창비
- 남상식, "현대예술의 혁명" (2004), 파주: 한길사
