지역사회복지를 위한 사회복지조례의 역할과 과제 -경기도 지역의 사회복지조례 입법 현황과 평가-
Roles and Tasks of Social Welfare Ordinance for Community Welfare -Current Status and Analysis of Local Government Social Welfare Ordinance in Gyunggi-do-
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Social welfare action is based on regional character and historicity so, it is not applied the whole country in the same way but is applied in a different way by regional and cultural character. Therefore Social welfare is acknowledged as the most representative and the most important original task of local government. In this paper I intend to search, for community welfare activation, what role ordinance of local government should do and in actually how it fulfill its function. In this paper I analyzed all local government in Gyunggi-do. After this analysis I could understand some characters as follows. First, the bigger the city is, the better the ordinance of that city development for example Suwon, Anyang, Yongin, Goyang etc. these cities are so. What is interesting is that some small cities of that financial condition is poor but social welfare ordinance is activated considerably for example Yangpyung, Yunchun are so. Second, while independent ordinance reflect regional character of the community as it is, similar ordinances are finded in other local government. Because if a ordinance is legislated and put into forced successfully in a city, neighbouring other local governments study this immediately and legislate similar ordinance, that is explained as so called “institutional theory”. By “institutional theory”, a organization accept institutionalized regulation that is the source of legitimacy for its survival, in process of institutional regulation acception, accept successful institution of other organization. Third, the ordinance that is reflected each regional character is activated, for example the ordinance related basic living guarantee is activated in Sungam, Buchun, and the ordinance related juvenile protection is activated in Dongduchun, Pyungtaek, and and the ordinance related welfare service for the aged is activated in Yangpyung,Yunchun and so on.
Abstract
Social welfare action is based on regional character and historicity so, it is not applied the whole country in the same way but is applied in a different way by regional and cultural character. Therefore Social welfare is acknowledged as the most representative and the most important original task of local government. In this paper I intend to search, for community welfare activation, what role ordinance of local government should do and in actually how it fulfill its function. In this paper I analyzed all local government in Gyunggi-do. After this analysis I could understand some characters as follows. First, the bigger the city is, the better the ordinance of that city development for example Suwon, Anyang, Yongin, Goyang etc. these cities are so. What is interesting is that some small cities of that financial condition is poor but social welfare ordinance is activated considerably for example Yangpyung, Yunchun are so. Second, while independent ordinance reflect regional character of the community as it is, similar ordinances are finded in other local government. Because if a ordinance is legislated and put into forced successfully in a city, neighbouring other local governments study this immediately and legislate similar ordinance, that is explained as so called “institutional theory”. By “institutional theory”, a organization accept institutionalized regulation that is the source of legitimacy for its survival, in process of institutional regulation acception, accept successful institution of other organization. Third, the ordinance that is reflected each regional character is activated, for example the ordinance related basic living guarantee is activated in Sungam, Buchun, and the ordinance related juvenile protection is activated in Dongduchun, Pyungtaek, and and the ordinance related welfare service for the aged is activated in Yangpyung,Yunchun and so on.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김광병, "지역사회복지 규범으로서 사회복지조례 입법평가에 관한 연구 : 서울특별시 25개 자치구의 자주조례를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2012
- 김성호, "조례제정권의 범위와 한계", 법과정책연구, (1(4)), pp.115~166 (2004), 한국법정책학회
- 金聖鎬, "地方議會의 立法權에 관한 硏究", 박사, pp.1994
- 김태웅, "자치입법권에 관한 연구 : 조례제정권을 중심으로", 박사, 법학, pp.2008
- 남세진, "한국사회복지론" (1995), 도서출판 나남
- 박원영, "조례의 법리에 관한 연구", 동아법학, (창간) (1985)
- 박태영, "지역사회복지론" (2006), 학현사
- 백종만, "사회복지분야의 지역격차", 환경과 사회, (9) (1996), 한국환경사회정책연구소
- 양철호, "광주ㆍ전남지역 기초자치단체의 사회복지조례 현황과발전 방향에 관한 연구", 사회복지정책, 9 (1999), 한국사회복지정책학회
- 윤찬영, "사회복지조례의 제정운동의 필요성과 전망", 자치행정연구, (2) (1997), 전주대 지방자치연구소
- 윤찬영, "사회복지법제론" (2010), 도서출판 나남
- 윤찬영, "사회복지의 이해" (2010), 학현사
- 이인재, "지방자치와 사회복지운동", 사회복지연구, (9) (1997), 서울대 사회복지연구소
- 정세욱, "지방행정학" (1997), 법문사
- 최승원, "사회복지법의 기초", 사회복지법제연구, (창간) (2010), 한국사회복지법제학회
- ominelli, L., "Social Work: Theory and Practice for the Changing Profession" (2004), Polity Press Ltd
- Peterson, P. E., "City Limits" (1981), University of Chicago Press
- Wong, Kenneth, "Economic constraint and political choice in urban policymaking", American Journal of Political Science, 32 (1988)
