使役句硏究小考‒英･中･韓･日 心理動詞 對照를 中心으로‒
A Study of Causatives Inquiry -Focusing on the English, Chinese, Korean, and Japanes Psychological Verbs-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문은 주어경험자 심리동사와 목적어경험자 심리동사는 다른 의미기능을 가지고 있는 것을 제시하였다. 주어논항의 의미가 목적어경험자 심리동사의 내부 차이점을 결정 하는 주요 기능임을 파악하고 “겁먹게 하다”와 같은 목적어경험자 심리동사의 동작주, 사건성, 상태성 검출을 위하여 두 가지 속성이 기능함을 알게 되었다. 즉 경험자의 심리상태를 유발하기 위하여 동작주가 억지로 무엇인가를 하는 여부와 경험자에게 심리상태의 변화가 존재 여부. 이와 같은 기능은 상태성 검출에서 자극은 심리상태에 내재된 고유성분의 일부이며 이것이 상태의 존재에 결정적인 역할을 한다는 것을 제시하였다. 유형학적인 검증을 통하여 사역형태소를 통한 심리동사가 사역의미를 나타내고, 이런 심리동사는 또한 사동화에 놓여 있다는 것을 알게 되었다.
Abstract
This paper argues that subject-experienced psychological verbs and object-experienced psychological verbs have different meaning functions. The meaning of the subject argument is proved the main function of interpreting the internal differences of the object experienced psychological verbs and that the two properties of the object psychological verbs such as “fightened”s agentive, eventive, stative reading. In other words, whether there is an Agent, which deliberately does something in order to bring a mental state in the experiencer; whether there exists a change of (mental) state in the experiencer. This function, on the stative reading the stimulus is an inherent part of the event of mental state and that it plays a crucial role in the existence of the state. Through typological examination, psychological verbs through the morphological causative showed the meaning of causative meanings, and these psychological verbs can undergo passivization.
참고문헌 (28)
- Arad M., "VP structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface", Doctoral, pp.1998
- Belletti A., "Psych-verb and θ-theory", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.291~ (1988)
- Goldberg A., "Constructure: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Grimshaw J., "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Kyumin Kim, "High applicatives in Korean causatives and passives", Lingua, 121, pp.489~510 (2011)
- Levin B., "The Formation of Adjectival Passives", Linguistic Inquiry (1986)
- Levin B., "Unaccustivity. At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT Press
- Levin B., "English Verbs Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation" (1993), University of Chicago
- Lin J., "Event Structure and the Encoding of Arguments: The Syntax of the Mandarin and English Verb Phrase", Doctoral, pp.2004
- Li Y, "Then Thematic hierarchy and causativity", Natrual Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, pp.255~282 (1995)
- Ogawa S., "The stage", individual distinction and (in)alienable posession, 2001, pp.77, 1~25
- Pesetsky D., "Binding problems with experiencer verbs", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.126~140 (1987)
- Pesetsky D., "Zero Syntax. Experiencers and cascades" (1995), MIT Press
- Pustejovsky J., "The Syntax of event structure", Cognition, 41, pp.47~82 (1991)
- Pustejovsky J., "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
- Pylkkänen L, "Proceeding of SALTX(Semantics and liguistic Theory)", pp.127~144 (2000), Cornell Uneversity
- Pylkkänen L., "Introducing Argument", Doctoral, pp.2002
- Song H., "Causatives and Resultatives in Korean", Doctoral, pp.2005
- Sugioka Y., "Transitivity alternations in de-adjectival verbs", Papers presented at the COE International Symposium held on (2000), Kanda University of International Sudies
- Talmy L., "Language Ttypology and Syntactic Description", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- 박소영, "한국어 통사사동의 세 유형", 현대문법연구, (74), pp.59~76 (2013), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 张豫峰, "现代汉语表致使态的使成句分析", 汉语学习 (2008)
- 张豫峰, "现代汉语使动句的完句成分考察", 复旦学报 (2009)
- 朴乡兰, "汉语使成结构的发展及其类型学解释", 汉语学习 (2015)
- 朴乡兰, "近代汉语表使役与表被动的“教", 叫”句研究, 北京大学, 2010
- 熊仲儒, "致使范畴“以”与“以”字处置", 语言科学, (1) (2012)
- 胡裕树, "动词研究" (1995), 河南大学出版社
- 赵杨, "使动及其中介语表征" (2006), 北京大学出版社