《四聲通解》에 반영된 近代漢語 어음 연구
A Research for the Modern Mandarin Phoneme the 《Sasongtonghae(四聲通解)》
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Domestic and foreign scholars all agree to the fact that Korean and Chinese transliteration from the early Joseon Dynasty offers relatively significant and direct tips for constructing the actual transliteration of Chinese language during the Won-myeong(元⋅明) period than any other references do. As to the history of developments on Chinese Language, the Modern Chinese plays a role as a bridge between the Ancient Chinese and the Present Chinese. It would be impossible to fully understand the Present Chinese Language without an adequate amount of study on the Modern Chinese. Plus, since the period of the modern Chinese was when the most of basic transliteration in the present Chinese were featured, numerous linguists are expecially interested in it. It cannot be denied that the Korean and Chinese transliteration from the Joseon Dynasty, written in phonogram, has been contributed greatly to researches on phonetic values of the actual transliteration at that period. And, the Korean and Chinese transliteration is also known to help the academia overcome the limitation of Chinese traditional phonology. The researches on Chinese traditional phonology would have relied on the elementary recording system of the transliteration only, if the Korean and Chinese transliteration has not been existed. The only recording systems that the linguists were able to refer to, except the documents on the transliteration, were Fanqie phonetic notation(反切) from Rhyme book(韻書) and Rhyme chart(韻圖). Amongst all, 《Sa-seong-tong-hae(四聲通解)》, the unique Woon-seo of the Joseon Dynasty, is the most valuable source since it contains personal views of Joseon phonologists toward the Chinese phonemes. The study is showing the transliteration system of Mandarin and the actual phonetic values in Chinese language, which have been reflected in 《Sa-seong-tong-hae(四聲通解)》. The research has been carried out good enough by looking at documents on the transliteration, such as Jeong-eum(正音), Sok-eum(俗音) and Keum-sok-eum(今俗音). Since the properties of the transliteration recording, like certain methods and principles on recording the transliteration, were particularly considered during the research. In other words, because it was not only on morphological characteristics of the transliteration recording, the study ended up with more objective and reasonable conclusions.
Abstract
Domestic and foreign scholars all agree to the fact that Korean and Chinese transliteration from the early Joseon Dynasty offers relatively significant and direct tips for constructing the actual transliteration of Chinese language during the Won-myeong(元⋅明) period than any other references do. As to the history of developments on Chinese Language, the Modern Chinese plays a role as a bridge between the Ancient Chinese and the Present Chinese. It would be impossible to fully understand the Present Chinese Language without an adequate amount of study on the Modern Chinese. Plus, since the period of the modern Chinese was when the most of basic transliteration in the present Chinese were featured, numerous linguists are expecially interested in it. It cannot be denied that the Korean and Chinese transliteration from the Joseon Dynasty, written in phonogram, has been contributed greatly to researches on phonetic values of the actual transliteration at that period. And, the Korean and Chinese transliteration is also known to help the academia overcome the limitation of Chinese traditional phonology. The researches on Chinese traditional phonology would have relied on the elementary recording system of the transliteration only, if the Korean and Chinese transliteration has not been existed. The only recording systems that the linguists were able to refer to, except the documents on the transliteration, were Fanqie phonetic notation(反切) from Rhyme book(韻書) and Rhyme chart(韻圖). Amongst all, 《Sa-seong-tong-hae(四聲通解)》, the unique Woon-seo of the Joseon Dynasty, is the most valuable source since it contains personal views of Joseon phonologists toward the Chinese phonemes. The study is showing the transliteration system of Mandarin and the actual phonetic values in Chinese language, which have been reflected in 《Sa-seong-tong-hae(四聲通解)》. The research has been carried out good enough by looking at documents on the transliteration, such as Jeong-eum(正音), Sok-eum(俗音) and Keum-sok-eum(今俗音). Since the properties of the transliteration recording, like certain methods and principles on recording the transliteration, were particularly considered during the research. In other words, because it was not only on morphological characteristics of the transliteration recording, the study ended up with more objective and reasonable conclusions.
참고문헌 (79)
- 影印本, "四聲通解" (1985), 대제각
- 影印本, "洪武正韻譯訓" (1985), 대제각
- "飜譯老乞大" (1985), 대제각
- "飜譯朴通事 ,上, 影印本" (1985), 대제각
- "通文館志" (1972), 경인문화사
- "中原音韻" (1978), 中華書局
- "洪武正韻", 商務印書館
- "重訂司馬溫公等韻圖經 膠卷本", 北京圖書館所藏
- "朝鮮李朝實錄中的中國史料" (1980), 中華書局
- 王崇實, "朝鮮文獻中的中國東北史料" (1991), 長白叢書
- 王 力, "漢語史稿" (1988), 山東敎育出版社
- 王 力, "漢語語音史" (1988), 山東敎育出版社
- 郭錫良, "漢字古音手冊" (1986), 北京大學出版社
- 楊耐思, "中原音韻音系" (1981), 中國社會科學出版社
- 郭 力, "<重訂司馬溫公等韻圖經>硏究", 석사, 北京大學碩士論文, pp.1987
- 蔣紹愚, "近代漢語硏究槪況" (1996), 北京大學出版社
- 耿振生, "明淸等韻學通論" (1992), 語文出版社
- 遠藤光, "飜譯老乞大ㆍ朴通事 漢字注音索引" (1990), 好文出版社
- 李鐘九, "老乞大ㆍ朴通事, 漢語語音硏究", 復旦大學博士學位論文, pp.1996
- 唐作藩, "普通話語音史話" (2000), 語文出版社
- 何九盈, "中國古代語言學史" (2000), 廣東敎育出版社
- 南廣祐, "朝鮮(李朝)漢字音硏究" (1993), 一潮閣
- 朱星一, "15, 16世紀朝漢對音硏究", 박사, 北京大學博士學位論文, pp.2000
- 葉寶奎, "明淸官話音系" (2001), 厦門大學出版社
- 李得春, "朝鮮對音文獻標音手冊" (2002), 黑龍江朝鮮民族出版社
- 寗忌浮, "洪武正韻硏究" (2003), 上海辭書出版社
- 金基石, "朝鮮韻書與明淸音系" (2003), 黑龍江朝鮮民族出版社
- 이강로, "사성통해의 음운학적 연구" (2004)
- 兪昌均, "韓國 古代漢字音의 硏究 Ⅰ" (1980), 啓明大學校出版部
- 李基文, "國語音韻史硏究" (1995), 塔出版社
- 金完鎭, "中世國語聲調의 硏究" (1994), 塔出版社
- 李成九, "訓民正音硏究" (1985), 도서출판Apple기획
- 한태동, "世宗代의 音聲學" (1998), 연세대학교출판부
- 주송식, "고대한어통론" (1989), 中文出版社
- 도수희, "한국어 음운사 연구" (1994), 塔出版社
- 權悳永, "古代韓中外交史" (1997), 一潮閣
- 姜信沆, "四聲通解硏究" (1980), 新雅社
- 姜信沆, "訓民正音硏究" (1994), 成均館大學出版部
- 姜信沆, "韓國의 譯學" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 姜信沆, "韓國의 韻書" (2000), 太學社
- 姜信沆, "四聲通解 音系 硏究 序說", 진단학보, 34 (1972)
- 孫建元, "<四聲通解>今俗音硏究" (2010), 中華書局
- 胡明揚, "老乞大諺解和朴通事諺解中所見的漢語朝鮮語對音", 中國語文, (3) (1963)
- 遠藤光, "<<飜譯老乞大ㆍ朴通事>里的漢語聲調>" (1984), 語言學論叢
- 楊耐思, "普通話語音探源, in 近代漢語音論" (1997), 商務印書館
- 李新魁, "論中原音韻的性質及它所代表的音系", 江漢學報 (1962)
- 李新魁,, "論近代漢語共通語的標準音", 語文硏究 (1980)
- 李崇寧, "洪武正韻譯訓 硏究", 震檀學報, 20 (1959)
- 李基文, "十六世紀 國語의 硏究", 高麗大學校文理論集, (4) (1959)
- 兪昌均, "四聲通解에 반영된蒙古韻略", 載元博士回甲紀念論叢 (1969)
- 鄭然粲, "十五世紀 國語의 Tone 硏究", 國語硏究, (8) (1960)
- 金海宗, "韓中朝貢關係考", 東洋史學硏究, 1 (1966)
- 鄭 光, "<飜譯老乞大, 朴通事>의 中國語音 表記 硏究", 國語國文學, 64 (1974)
- 朴炳采, "<洪武正韻譯訓>俗音考", 高麗大學校文科大學人文論集, 20 (1975)
- 楊人從, "十五世紀中國北方音音韻體系", 建國大學校大學院論文集, 13 (1981)
- 李敦柱, "<飜譯老乞大, 朴通事>의 漢音調價에 관하여", 國語學, 18 (1989)
- 李敦柱, "<飜譯老乞大,朴通事>의 漢音上聲變調에 관하여", 周時經學報, 3 (1989)
- 李敦柱, "<飜譯老乞大, 朴通事>凡例考(Ⅰ)", 語文論叢, 10 (1989)
- 李敦柱, "<飜譯老乞大, 朴通事>凡例考(Ⅱ)", 湖南文化硏究, 18 (1989)
- 金九鎭, "朝鮮前期 韓中 關係史 試論", 弘益史學, 4 (1990)
- 박태권, "<훈몽자회>와 <사성통해> 연구(2)", 어문논집, 24(25) (1985)
- 李在敦, "<四聲通解>에 반영된 16世紀 中國語音系 硏究", 中國文學, 21 (1993)
- 黎新第, "普通話古淸入字歸調條理探索", 音韻學硏究, 3 (1994), 中華書局
- 曾曉渝, "試論<西儒耳目資>的語音基礎及明代官話的標準音", 西南師範大學學報 (1991)
- 曾曉渝, "<西儒耳目資>的調値擬測", 語言硏究 (1992)
- 李得春, "朝鮮歷代漢語硏究評價", 延邊大學學報 (1994)
- 金基石, "朝鮮文獻對音中的入聲字及其歸派", 語文硏究 (1999)
- 賀 巍, "漢語官話方言入聲消失的成因", 中國語文 (1995)
- 丁邦新, "論官話方言硏究中的幾個問題, in 丁邦新語言學論文集" (1998), 商務印書館
- 장위동, "正音俗音皆時論辨", 중국학연구, (19) (2000)
- 김태성, "조선 신숙주의 중국어관", 중국언어연구, 14, pp.181~197 (2002), 한국중국언어학회
- 주성일, "조선초기 韓中 對譯音 자료를 통해 본 捲舌音의 형성과정", 중국어문논역총간, 14, pp.205~219 (2005), 중국어문논역학회
- 朱星一, "조선 초기 韓中 譯音 자료에 나타난 중국어음 표기방식 연구 － 申叔舟식과 崔世珍식 어음표기를 중심으로", 중어중문학, 38(38), pp.37~71 (2006), 한국중어중문학회
- 朱星一, "申叔舟와 崔世珍의 中國語 正音觀", 중국학보, 57(57), pp.53~82 (2008), 한국중국학회
- 배은한, "홍무정 판본이급 사통해 지분계", 중국언어연구, 20(20), pp.435~469 (2005), 한국중국언어학회
- 이영월, "四聲通解에 기재된 中原音韻 주석 연구", 중국학연구, (32), pp.69~92 (2005), 중국학연구회
- 유재원, "飜譯老乞大朴通事 중국어 표음에 관한 고찰- 變則의 類型을 중심으로 -", 중국학연구, 36(36), pp.27~74 (2006), 중국학연구회
- Zhangxiaoman, "崔世珍《四聲通解》是最早反映漢語北方話m尾已幷入n尾的", 중국언어연구, 24(24), pp.605~618 (2007), 한국중국언어학회
- "正音俗音皆時論辨"[URL]