‘谁也赢不了’류 구문의 중의성 분석
The study on structural ambiguity of ‘Shei ye yingbuliao’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ambiguity is an issue that receives attention in the Chinese linguistic academia, and causes difficulty for Korean students learning Chinese. This study analyzes the causes of the sentence “Shei ye yingbuliao” to have two different meanings, and examines the process in which such ambiguity is resolved in the usual process of conversation. Studies on ambiguity have so far been conducted at the levels of vocabulary, phrase and sentence, but this method has limitations. Accordingly, this study intends to analyze sentences at the levels of vocabulary, syntax and pragmatics, and provide explanations using specific examples. The results of the analysis show that the sentence “Shei ye yingbuliao” has two meanings due to the reference ambiguity of “谁(Shei),” its predicate governing the agent with the trait [+animate]) and patient argument and the marked distribution of its patient argument. Despite its inconvenience arising in a communication process, this sentence is used by virtue of its information structure and pragmatic usage (function). Furthermore, it is used for humorous and satirical purposes. In the actual process of conversation, the ambiguity of such sentences that can be interpreted in different ways can be resolved by making inference based on the content of texts and the context outside conversation, which leads to a successful communication between the speaker and listener.
Abstract
Ambiguity is an issue that receives attention in the Chinese linguistic academia, and causes difficulty for Korean students learning Chinese. This study analyzes the causes of the sentence “Shei ye yingbuliao” to have two different meanings, and examines the process in which such ambiguity is resolved in the usual process of conversation. Studies on ambiguity have so far been conducted at the levels of vocabulary, phrase and sentence, but this method has limitations. Accordingly, this study intends to analyze sentences at the levels of vocabulary, syntax and pragmatics, and provide explanations using specific examples. The results of the analysis show that the sentence “Shei ye yingbuliao” has two meanings due to the reference ambiguity of “谁(Shei),” its predicate governing the agent with the trait [+animate]) and patient argument and the marked distribution of its patient argument. Despite its inconvenience arising in a communication process, this sentence is used by virtue of its information structure and pragmatic usage (function). Furthermore, it is used for humorous and satirical purposes. In the actual process of conversation, the ambiguity of such sentences that can be interpreted in different ways can be resolved by making inference based on the content of texts and the context outside conversation, which leads to a successful communication between the speaker and listener.
참고문헌 (42)
- 曹逢甫, "功能主义與汉语语法" (1994), 北京语言学院出版社
- 陈高春, "使用汉语语法大词典" (1993), 中国劳动出版社
- 刘月华, "使用现代汉语语法" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (2005), 商务印书馆
- 徐烈炯, "话题的结構與功能" (2007), 上海教育出版社
- 王维成, "三个平面汉语语法研究的多维视野" (1998), 语文出版社
- 吴英才, "现代汉语的歧义" (1997), 宁夏人民出版社
- 成海燕, "周遍性成分在主语, 宾语位置上的分布研究", 硕士, pp.2008
- 徐仲华, "汉语书面语言歧义现象举例", 中国语文, (3) (1979)
- 吕叔湘, "歧义类例", 中国语文, (5) (1984)
- 石安石, "说歧义", 中国语言学报, (3) (1994)
- 詹继曼, "关于同形结构的研究", 新疆大学学报哲学人文社会科学版, (1) (1990)
- 朱德熙, "在黑板上写字” 及相关句式", 语言教学与研究, (1) (1981)
- 陆俭明, "周遍性主语句及其他", 中国语文, (3) (1986)
- 方 梅, "汉语对比焦點的句法表现手段", 中国语文, (4) (1995)
- 陈昌来, "这个人谁都不相信”这类歧义句", 烟台师范学院学报, (1) (1988)
- 施关淦, "汉语书面语言歧义现象举例", 中国语文, (1) (1980)
- 程节华, "自动分词中的歧义字段分析及处理", 安徽农业技术师范学院学报, (3) (2000)
- 任桂琴, "句子语境中汉语词汇歧义消解的眼动研究", 心里科学, (4) (2008)
- 张自伟, "广告英语中词汇歧义的语用价值及其翻译方法", 湖北三峡职业技术学院学报, (1) (2008)
- 杨丽霞, "工作记忆、意思相对频率与汉语歧义句的加工", 心理科学, (3) (1999)
- 汪 君, "广告语言中的修辞歧义分析", 大众文艺, (18) (2010)
- 王志波, "歧义在商业广告中的积极效果与幽默效果", 中北大学学报(社会科学版), (1) (2008)
- Knud Lambrecht, "정보 구조와 문장형식" (2000), 월인
- Fillmore, "격문법이란 무엇인가" (1968), 을유문화사
- 시사영어사출판사, "英語學辭典" (1990), 신아사
- 이정민, "언어학사전" (1987), 박이정
- Stephen C. Levinson, "화용론" (1992), 한신문화사
- 朴景賢, "國語意味의 模糊性 硏究", 석사, pp.1976
- 가보서, "现代汉语“给”字句歧义现象分析", 중국언어연구, (50), pp.23~54 (2014), 한국중국언어학회
- 김혜경, "V-R구조의 중의성(Ambiguity)에 관한 소고 ― V의 동사자질과 R의 의미역을 중심으로", 중국어문논총, (40), pp.55~74 (2009), 중국어문연구회
- 김현철, "현대중국어 끊어 읽기에 따른 중의성의 구별", 중국어문학논집, (73), pp.113~144 (2012), 중국어문학연구회
- 이리, "汉语模糊ㆍ多义ㆍ歧义分析", 동북아 문화연구, 1(47), pp.177~192 (2016), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 맹춘영, "‘NP1+V+死+NP2+了’의 意味 小考 ― ‘我想死你了’와 ‘你想死我了’를 中心으로", 중국어문학논집, (52), pp.131~148 (2008), 중국어문학연구회
- 송영규, "句子歧義現象的認知解釋", 중어중문학, (43), pp.575~593 (2008), 한국중어중문학회
- 유덕근, "중의적 정보의 실시간 이해 전략과 정보 활용 방식 연구 - 비주얼 월드 방식을 중심으로", 독일어문학, 24(1), pp.185~216 (2016), 한국독일어문학회
- 이명아, "중국어 호칭어 중의성에 관한 소고", 중국어문논총, (64), pp.75~97 (2014), 중국어문연구회
- 이은수, "‘주편성’ 구문과 주제 구문", 열린정신 인문학 연구, 15(1), pp.259~280 (2014), 인문학연구소
- 최재영, "제7차 교육과정중국어과‘ 기본어휘표’ 제시의문제점과개선방안: 단어의重義性고찰을중심으로", 외국어교육연구, 21(1), pp.121~149 (2007), 외국어교육연구소
- 한성일, "언어전략으로서의 중의성 연구", 한국어 의미학, 27, pp.341~364 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- Ullmann, S., "Semantics -An Introduction to Science Meaning" (1962), Blackwell
- Cruse, D. A., "On Lexical Ambiguity", Nottingham Linguistics Circular, 11(2) (1982)