본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

판소리에 있어 서술-핍진성과유희-예술성의 상관관계

Correlations between Narrative Verisimilitude & Playing Artistry in Pansori

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Verisimilitude (‘vraisemblance’ in French), as an appearance of truth, refers to a neoclassic idea of reality, morality, and universality. It denotes also, in all arts, literature and theatre, in particular, the extent to which a work of fiction exhibits some realism, or otherwise conforms to our sense of realistic credibility or prbability. What will be so its definition, function, status in pansori? It is indeniable that like all other fictive genders, pansori also depends on certain linguistic textual narrative form. But as the narration in pansori being actualized by vocal, musical and mimetic reprsentation before some audience, the narrative versimilitude in pansori is far more flexible than in others and tends to even yield to diverse aesthetic aspects of playing artistry. The purpose of this paper is so to examine the correlations between narrative verisimilitude and playing artistry in pansori. This, by adopting ‘versimilitude’ as a main operative concept for approach to textual effects in general, and establishing a double complementary and oppositive relations between:recit vs discourse, narrative vs descriptive.

Abstract

Verisimilitude (‘vraisemblance’ in French), as an appearance of truth, refers to a neoclassic idea of reality, morality, and universality. It denotes also, in all arts, literature and theatre, in particular, the extent to which a work of fiction exhibits some realism, or otherwise conforms to our sense of realistic credibility or prbability. What will be so its definition, function, status in pansori? It is indeniable that like all other fictive genders, pansori also depends on certain linguistic textual narrative form. But as the narration in pansori being actualized by vocal, musical and mimetic reprsentation before some audience, the narrative versimilitude in pansori is far more flexible than in others and tends to even yield to diverse aesthetic aspects of playing artistry. The purpose of this paper is so to examine the correlations between narrative verisimilitude and playing artistry in pansori. This, by adopting ‘versimilitude’ as a main operative concept for approach to textual effects in general, and establishing a double complementary and oppositive relations between:recit vs discourse, narrative vs descriptive.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 강등학 외, "한국 구비문학의 이해" (2000), 월인
  2. 고영근, "텍스트이론과 문학작품의 분석", 텍스트언어학, 4, pp.1~26 (1997)
  3. 김연수, "창본 춘향가, 창본 심청가, 창본 수궁가 등", ~ (1967)
  4. 김익두, "판소리, 그 지고의 신체 전략:판소리의 공연학적 면모" (2003), 평민사
  5. 김태곤 외, "한국구비문학 개론" (1995), 민속원
  6. 박영주, "판소리 사설의 특성과 미학" (2000), 보고사
  7. 유제호, "판소리에 대한 묘사 중심 접근의 가능성 모색", 판소리연구, 26, pp.175~199 (2008)
  8. 이광숙, "문학작품 분석에서 텍스트언어학적 접근가능성", 텍스트언어학, 1, pp.113~126 (1993)
  9. 林明鎭, "판소리의 서술성황과 現前性의 상관관계 - '매개자'로서의 광대의 역할과 그 작용의 문제 -", 판소리연구, 13, pp.319~341 (2002), 판소리학회
  10. 조동일 외1, "판소리의 理解" (1978), 창작과비평사
  11. 최동현, "판소리 명창과 고수 연구" (1997), 신아출판사
  12. 최동현, "판소리의 미학과 역사" (2005), 민속원
  13. 최동현, "교주본 적벽가" (2005), 민속원
  14. 최진형, "판소리의 미학과 장르 실현" (2002), 보고사
  15. 한용환, "서사 이론과 그 쟁점들" (2002), 문예출판사
  16. 홍순일, "<적벽가> 창본의 극적 갈등양상과 의미", 판소리연구, 22, pp.135~170 (2006)
  17. 황석자, "소설의 다음성 현상:함의와 해석" (1989), 한신문화사
  18. 토도로프, "산문의 시학" (2003), 예림기획
  19. Authier-Revuz, J., "Ces Mots Qui ne Vont pas de Soi" (1995), Larousse
  20. Bres, J., "La Narrativite" (1994), Louvain-la-Neuve, Duculot
  21. Bonzon S. et al., "La narration, Quand le recit devient communication" (1988), Labor Fides
  22. Genette, G., "Figures II" (1969), Paris, Seuil
  23. Genette, G., "Figures III" (1972), Paris, Seuil
  24. Hamon, P., "Introduction ?l'analyse du descriptif" (1981), Hachette
  25. Halpern Joseph, "Describing the Surreal, Yale French Studies", Towards a Theory of Description, 61, pp.89~106 (1981)
  26. Hamon Philippe, "Rhetorical Status of the Descriptive, Yale French Studies", Towards a Theory of Description, 61, pp.1~26 (1981)
  27. Lintvelt Jaap, "Typologie narrative, le “point de vue”" (1989), Jose Corti
  28. Mosher Harold, F., "Towards a Poetics of ‘Descriptized’ Narration", Poetics Today, 12(3), pp.425~445 (1991)
  29. Rabatel, A., "La dialogisation au coeur du couple polyphonie", dialogisme chez Bakhtine, 2006, pp.41(1), 55~80
  30. Rastier, F., "Formes semantiques et textualite" (2004), Poetique et Testualite, Larousse -Armand Colin.Authier-Revuz J.(1995), Ces Mots Qui ne Vont pas de Soi, Larousse

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)