TV 시사 토론에 나타나는 사회자와 토론자의 상호작용 양상
The Modality of Facilitator and Panel Interaction on TV Current Affairs Debates
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay has considered the formal structure and aspects of content as regards the interaction between the debate facilitator and the panel on TV current affairs debate programs on evening live broadcasts. This present essay has carefully observed TV debate programs on current affairs topics that focused on controversial issues related to Sejong City that aired in the latter half of 2009 on KBS, MBC, and SBS through three respective programs. First, this study has examined what kind of overall structure a current affairs debate program is made of, taking into consideration the formal structure as well as the underlying content of the program, including the area of communication from the perspective of the panel. From the perspective of each member of the panel, a current affairs debate program possesses a multifaceted structure that offers an on-going interaction between the facilitator and other debaters, a characteristic particular to current affairs debate programs, which in turn, eases the formality of the proceedings compared to other debate formats. Next, this study has investigated the various ways through which the facilitator and the panel interact, both in formal aspects as well as in the formation of the debate content itself. On a current affairs debate program, mainly formed by the dialogue among debate participants, though the facilitator takes on the role of one who grants the right to speak, the panel members themselves can be observed to also participate in the process of granting the right to speak to other members as well. Also, although the facilitator takes on the lead role in the formation of the main content of the debate by articulating the subject of the debate and steering the direction of the debate proceeding itself, the panel also can be observed to actively participate and thereby intervene during the debate in order to steer the dialogue toward an appropriate direction that highlights their respective logical justification of their stance.
Abstract
This essay has considered the formal structure and aspects of content as regards the interaction between the debate facilitator and the panel on TV current affairs debate programs on evening live broadcasts. This present essay has carefully observed TV debate programs on current affairs topics that focused on controversial issues related to Sejong City that aired in the latter half of 2009 on KBS, MBC, and SBS through three respective programs. First, this study has examined what kind of overall structure a current affairs debate program is made of, taking into consideration the formal structure as well as the underlying content of the program, including the area of communication from the perspective of the panel. From the perspective of each member of the panel, a current affairs debate program possesses a multifaceted structure that offers an on-going interaction between the facilitator and other debaters, a characteristic particular to current affairs debate programs, which in turn, eases the formality of the proceedings compared to other debate formats. Next, this study has investigated the various ways through which the facilitator and the panel interact, both in formal aspects as well as in the formation of the debate content itself. On a current affairs debate program, mainly formed by the dialogue among debate participants, though the facilitator takes on the role of one who grants the right to speak, the panel members themselves can be observed to also participate in the process of granting the right to speak to other members as well. Also, although the facilitator takes on the lead role in the formation of the main content of the debate by articulating the subject of the debate and steering the direction of the debate proceeding itself, the panel also can be observed to actively participate and thereby intervene during the debate in order to steer the dialogue toward an appropriate direction that highlights their respective logical justification of their stance.
참고문헌 (15)
- 강내원, "시사토론 프로그램의 비판적 시청과 미디어교육적 함의", 국어교육연구, 8, pp.45~67 (2001)
- 강태완, "방송3사 시사토론 프로그램의 형식, 구성 및 논증에 관한 연구", 한국방송학보, 16(1), pp.7~42 (2002), 한국방송학회
- 김진무, "라디오 토론에서 의견 불일치 행위", 불어불문학연구, 56(56), pp.635~659 (2003), 한국불어불문학회
- 김진무, "TV 토론에서 수사질문", 한국프랑스학논집, 67, pp.63~88 (2009)
- 김훈순, "사회적 공론장으로서 텔레비전 토론 프로그램-장르 관습과 한계", 한국언론정보학보, 18, pp.63~96 (2002), 한국언론정보학회
- 나미수, "공론장으로서 텔레비전 시사토론 프로그램에 대한 평가-KBS, MBC, SBS, EBS의 시사토론 프로그램 내용분석-", 방송통신연구, 2003(2), pp.107~145 (2003), 한국방송학회
- 민병곤, "TV 토론 담화의 논증 분석", 텍스트언어학, 11, pp.73~109 (2001)
- 박용익, "텔레비전 정치노론회의 대화분석", 텍스트언어학, 4, pp.139~166 (1997)
- 박용한, "과제중심적 대화에서의 대화 전략 운영에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 안광식, "토론 프로그램의 기능과 역할", 방송연구, pp.58~71 (1987)
- 오미영, "토론 vs.TV토론" (2004), 역락
- 이창덕, "화법 교육론" (2010), 역락
- 임규홍, "TV 토론에서 ‘발언권 주고 빼앗기’의 담화 분석", 담화와 인지, 8(2), pp.181~203 (2001)
- 정병수, "토론 프로그램의 영역과 포맷", 방송연구, pp.72~83 (1987)
- 이원표, "담화연구의 기초(Jan Renkema, Discourse Studies)" (1996), 한국문화사
