<해조신문>과 <공립신보>의 상호텍스트성 연구
A Study on the Intertextuality of the Haejo and the Gonnip Shinbo.
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Haejo and the Gonglipsinbo were Korean newspapers that were both published abroad for overseas Koreans during the time of enlightenment. The Haejo was published in Vladivostok for three months from February 26 to May 26, 1908, and the Gonnip Shinbo was issued for more than three months in San Francisco from November 22, 1905 to January,1909, until it was changed into the Shinhan Minbo. The former was a daily newspaper, and the latter was a weekly one(biweekly in the beginning). During the period of enlightenment, there were neither a lot of types of newspapers nor correspondents . It means that there were highly likely to quote the articles of other newspapers or telegrams. Therefore the two newspapers seem to have been linked to each other, and the purpose of this study was to examine the intertextuality of the two newspapers in terms of the style and the content of news, as the Haejo is more similar to the Gonnip Shinbo than any other domestic newspaper in form and content. The styles of the two newspapers were the same: a combination of Korean and Sino-Korean, which was more similar to the Hangul style. And both used a literary style that was similar to the spoken language. They utilized easy-to-understand Korean to stimulate contemporary ethnic people’s patriotism, and just a minimum range of Sino-Korean was used. As they were part of the formal press, they seemed to have used a formal literary style to keep some distance from readers. It could definitely be inferred from the styles of the newspapers that they tried to arouse ethnic Koreans’ patriotism, to enlighten them and to back up national independence movement when they wrote about domestic and international situations. In terms of the content of news,articles and the process of report about a particular incident were analyzed. The analyzed incident was the assassination of Stevenson that took place on March 23, 1908. As a result, i t’s found that although both of the newspapers reported on this incident, the way of doing it was a l ittle different. The t ime of report was not the same, probably because of the distance between the two regions where they were published. And in the Gonnip Shinbo, there were some changes in the weight of the news, the composition of paper and the way of quotation.
Abstract
The Haejo and the Gonglipsinbo were Korean newspapers that were both published abroad for overseas Koreans during the time of enlightenment. The Haejo was published in Vladivostok for three months from February 26 to May 26, 1908, and the Gonnip Shinbo was issued for more than three months in San Francisco from November 22, 1905 to January,1909, until it was changed into the Shinhan Minbo. The former was a daily newspaper, and the latter was a weekly one(biweekly in the beginning). During the period of enlightenment, there were neither a lot of types of newspapers nor correspondents . It means that there were highly likely to quote the articles of other newspapers or telegrams. Therefore the two newspapers seem to have been linked to each other, and the purpose of this study was to examine the intertextuality of the two newspapers in terms of the style and the content of news, as the Haejo is more similar to the Gonnip Shinbo than any other domestic newspaper in form and content. The styles of the two newspapers were the same: a combination of Korean and Sino-Korean, which was more similar to the Hangul style. And both used a literary style that was similar to the spoken language. They utilized easy-to-understand Korean to stimulate contemporary ethnic people’s patriotism, and just a minimum range of Sino-Korean was used. As they were part of the formal press, they seemed to have used a formal literary style to keep some distance from readers. It could definitely be inferred from the styles of the newspapers that they tried to arouse ethnic Koreans’ patriotism, to enlighten them and to back up national independence movement when they wrote about domestic and international situations. In terms of the content of news,articles and the process of report about a particular incident were analyzed. The analyzed incident was the assassination of Stevenson that took place on March 23, 1908. As a result, i t’s found that although both of the newspapers reported on this incident, the way of doing it was a l ittle different. The t ime of report was not the same, probably because of the distance between the two regions where they were published. And in the Gonnip Shinbo, there were some changes in the weight of the news, the composition of paper and the way of quotation.
참고문헌 (66)
- 구명숙, "신문 보도기사와 사설의 텍스트언어학적 분석", 석사, pp.2010
- 김대룡, "해조신문의 교육론에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2008
- 김봉순, "신문 기사에 반영된 필자의 주관성", 텍스트 언어학, 7, pp.57~78 (1999)
- 김상태, "문체의 이론과 해석(증보판)" (1993), 집문당
- 김생기, "韋庵 張志淵의 愛國活動과 民族意識", 한국민족운동사연구, 30, pp.233~256 (2002), 한국민족운동사학회
- 김선영, "현대패션에 나타난 소재의 상호텍스트성", 한국의류학회지, 32(5), pp.741~752 (2008), 한국의류학회
- 김완진, "한국어 문체의 발달,한국어문의 제문제" (1983), 일지사
- 김진권, "상호텍스트성-챠우더의 거시텍스트이론을 중심으로 하여", 텍스트언어학, 4, pp.207~239 (1997)
- 김형철, "갑오경장기의 문체", 새국어생활, 4(4), pp.100~129 (1994)
- 김형철, "개화기 국어 어휘, 국어의 시대별 변천 연구", pp.115~162 (1999), 국립국어연구원
- 김혜진, "한성주보의 국어학적 연구", 석사, pp.2008
- 김훈순, "구한말 오대지 연구:민족언론의 역사적의의를 중심으로", 석사, pp.1980
- 김흥수, "언어학적 문체론의 위상과 과제", 국어국문학, 100, pp.63~74 (1988)
- 김흥수, "문체의 변화, 국어사연구", pp.955~1025 (1997), 태학사
- 남기심, "개화기 국어 문체에 대하여", pp.71~86 (1977), 연세교육과학
- 민현식, "개화기 국어 문체 연구", 국어국문학, 111, pp.37~61 (1994)
- 민현식, "개화기 국어 문체에 대한 종합적 연구1", 국어교육, 83, pp.113~152 (1994)
- 민현식, "개화기 국어 문체에 대한 종합적 연구2", 국어교육, 85, pp.101~123 (1994)
- 민현식, "19세기 국어에 대한 종합적 검토", 국어국문학, 2(149), pp.23~68 (2008), 국어국문학회
- 박 환, "러시아한인민족운동사" (1995), 탐구당
- 박갑수, "국어문체론" (1995), 대한교과서
- 박건용, "상호텍스트성 이론의 형성, 수용 및 적용에 대한 연구", 독어교육, 32(32), pp.359~385 (2005), 한국독어독문학교육학회
- 박영섭, "개화기 외래어 표기에 대한 고찰", 어문논집, 17, pp.21~33 (1983)
- 박영섭, "개화기 신문에 나타난 어휘고-차용어를 중심으로", 강남대학교 논문집, 25, pp.55~80 (1994)
- 박재영, "신문 지면의 구성 요소" (2004), 재단법인 미디어연구소
- 박재영, "신문 기사의 텍스트언어학적 분석" (2004), 재단법인 미디어연구소
- 申世羅, "鄭淳萬의 생애와 민족운동", 한국근현대사연구, 25, pp.227~259 (2003), 한국근현대사학회
- 신운용, "안중근의 의병투쟁과 활동", 한국민족운동사연구, 54(54), pp.5~44 (2008), 한국민족운동사학회
- 신중진, "개화기 한글자료의 말뭉치 구축", 관악어문연구, 29, pp.261~283 (2004)
- 신지연, "개화기 가사 자료의 현황과 의미", 어문연구, 64, pp.31~57 (2010), 어문연구학회
- 심재기, "개화기의 교과서 문체에 대하여", 국어국문학, 107, pp.181~194 (1992)
- 심재기, "개화기 문체양상에 관한 연구-독립신문과 한어문전의 고담을 중심으로", 한국문화, 13, pp.91~107 (1992), 서울대 한국문화연구소
- 심재기, "국어문체변천사" (1999), 집문당
- 안종묵, "해조신문의 광고에 관한 일 연구", 한국언론학보, 46(5), pp.2~72 (2002), 한국언론학회
- 이광린, "황성신문 연구", 동방학지, 59, pp.1~44 (1986), 연세대학교
- 이광린, "개화기 연구" (1994), 일조각
- 이광호, "근대국어 문법론" (2004), 태학사
- 이기문, "개화기의 국문 연구" (1970), 일조각
- 이기문, "개화기의 국문 사용에 관한 연구", 한국문화, 5, pp.65~84 (1984)
- 이상오, "한말개화기의 일본인의 관심어휘와 어구에 대하여", 인문연구, 7, pp.747~784 (1985), 영남대학교
- 이상오, "구한말 개화기의 일본어 유입과정에 대하여", 인문연구, 8, pp.25~74 (1986), 영남대학교
- 이석주, "개화기 국어 표기 연구", 한성대학 논문집, 3, pp.53~67 (1979)
- 이석주, "개화기 국어 문장 연구", 한성대 논문집, 14, pp.107~121 (1990)
- 이성만, "텍스트언어학의 계보, 대상 그리고 경향", 언어과학연구, 11(52), pp.119~148 (2010), 언어과학회
- 이성만, "텍스트에서 담화로 - 텍스트언어학의 확장", 텍스트언어학, 29, pp.315~340 (2010), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 이원표, "신문 사설에서의 직접인용:Bakhtin의 ‘대화성(dialogicality)’ 관점에서의 분석", 담화와 인지, 12(2), pp.117~151 (2005), 담화·인지언어학회
- 이이화, "한국사 이야기19-오백년 왕국의 종말" (2003), 한길사
- 이이화, "한국사 이야기20-우리 힘으로 나라를 찾겠다" (2003), 한길사
- 이현희, "19세기 국어의 문법사적 고찰", 한국문화, 15, pp.57~81 (1994)
- 이현희, "개화기 국어 자료", 국어의 시대별 변천 연구, 4, pp.235~279 (1999), 국립국어원
- 장소원, "현대국어와 역사성 - 문체", 國語學, 37(45), pp.373~406 (2005), 국어학회
- 조동일, "한국문학통사 4", pp.272~314 (1989), 지식산업사
- 조용훈, "그림책의 상호텍스트성 유형 연구", 한국문학이론과 비평, 14(2), pp.407~428 (2010), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 최기영, "구한말 공립신보, 신한민보에 관한 일고찰", 동아연구, 17, pp.575~607 (1989), 서강대학교 동아연구소
- 한국언론사연구회, "대한매일신보연구" (2004), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 한국텍스트언어학회, "신문언어와 텍스트분석", 한국텍스트언어학회 99춘계학술대회 (1999)
- 한국텍스트언어학회, "텍스트언어학의 이해" (2004), 박이정
- 한림대학교 아시아문화연구소, "죠신문" (1995)
- 한성일, "유머텍스트의 상호텍스트성", 텍스트언어학, 30(17), pp.309~332 (2004), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 이승연, "근대국어 문법의 이해" (1998), 박이정출판사
- Bakhtin Mikhail, "The Dialogic imagination" (1981), The University of TexasPress
- Brinker, K., "텍스트언어학의 이해" (1994), 한국문화사
- Dressler, W., "텍스트언어학 개론" (2004), 한국문화사
- Heinemann, W, "텍스트언어학 입문" (2001), 역락
- Vater, H., "텍스트언어학 입문" (2006), 한국문화사
- "블라디보스콕을 사랑하는 모임"[URL]