본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

푸틴 대통령 기자회견 발화에 대한 비판적 담화 분석 - Fairclough의 CDA 이론을 중심으로 -

Critical discourse analysis of Putin's speech at the press conference: focusing on Fairclough's CDA theory

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This article explores how the power structures in discourses are reflected and become encoded in discourse strategies from the viewpoint of Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis. The target data is Vladimir Putin's annual press conference. Firstly, the metaphors represent shifting responsibility on another. Putin appears to have expressed a strong sense of responsibility for others by using metaphors. Secondly, rhetorical questions reveal getting the start on another. In particular, it was found that the frequency of the rhetorical questions is very high. This can be interpreted as being used as a means to emphasize one's speech. Thirdly, it is verified that so-called higher power participant in the discourse interrupts utterance of low power participant in the discourse. Fourthly, it was obviously revealed in the discourse that the advantageous structure for higher power participant's statement was backgrounded. Furthermore, this study reveals further feature to Fairclough's the set of formal features. It is the 'characterized agent'. Characterizing the agent, higher power participant in the discourse constricts another participant.

Abstract

This article explores how the power structures in discourses are reflected and become encoded in discourse strategies from the viewpoint of Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis. The target data is Vladimir Putin's annual press conference. Firstly, the metaphors represent shifting responsibility on another. Putin appears to have expressed a strong sense of responsibility for others by using metaphors. Secondly, rhetorical questions reveal getting the start on another. In particular, it was found that the frequency of the rhetorical questions is very high. This can be interpreted as being used as a means to emphasize one's speech. Thirdly, it is verified that so-called higher power participant in the discourse interrupts utterance of low power participant in the discourse. Fourthly, it was obviously revealed in the discourse that the advantageous structure for higher power participant's statement was backgrounded. Furthermore, this study reveals further feature to Fairclough's the set of formal features. It is the 'characterized agent'. Characterizing the agent, higher power participant in the discourse constricts another participant.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "미 ABC 방송"[URL]
  2. "Obama 대통령 사료관"[URL]
  3. "청와대 홈페이지"[URL]
  4. "크렘린 사이트"[URL]
  5. 국기연, "대통령 따라 달라지는 백악관 기자회견 스타일", 관훈저널, 146, pp.129~134 (2018)
  6. 박종갑, "의문문과 간접언어행위", 영남어문학, 9, pp.55~76 (1982)
  7. 성기홍, "백악관의 대통령 기자회견 준비과정 및 진행방식", 관훈저널, 113, pp.166~171 (2009)
  8. 이귀혜, "한국 대통령들의 설득 수사학: 에토스 · 파토스 · 로고스 개념을 중심으로", 한국소통학보, (8), pp.277~313 (2007), 한국소통학회
  9. 이성만, "페어클러프(N. Fairclough)의 비판적 담화분석- 언어학적 텍스트분석의 또 다른 대안인가?", 독일어문학, 13(1), pp.389~410 (2005), 한국독일어문학회
  10. Beglova E. I., "Yazikovoi kod’ politicheskoi kommunikacii_namateriale vistuplenii prezidenta Rossii V.V. Putina 2012_2015", Politicheskaya lingvistika, 3, pp.12~16 (2015)
  11. Eshbaugh-Soha, M., "The politics of presidential speeches Congress & Presidency", American University, Center for Congressional Presidential Studies, 37, pp.1~21 (2010)
  12. Fairclough. N., "Language and Power" (1989), Longman
  13. Fairclough. N., "Discourse and Social Change" (1992), Polity Press
  14. Humphrey, K. H., "American Presidential Speeches : A frame analysis" (2014), Universitas Bergensis
  15. Ivanova I. V., "Leksiko_stilisticheskie parametri publichnoi rechi V. Putina_Namateriale sopostavitelnogo analiza press_konferencii V. Putina dlya rossiiskihi inostrannih jurnalistov kak janrovogo novoobrahovaniya intervyu", Almanah sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya, 3(3), pp.84~87 (2007)
  16. Kress, G., "Language as ideology" (1979), Routledge & Kegan Paul
  17. Melber, A., "The People's Press Conference : A new initiative empowers citizens to submit questions for the president to answer", The nation, 288(13), pp.22~24 (2009)
  18. Neff, D., "In His Second Press Conference as President, Bush Sides With Israel, Defends Security Council Veto", Washington report on middle east affairs, 20(4), pp.9~ (2001)
  19. Schiffrin. D., "Approaches to discourse" (1994), Cambridge, Mass
  20. Zaharova O. V., "Strategii reprezentacii kategorii “konsolidaciya” v konyunktivnom diskurse rossiiskogo prezidenta", Vestnik Instituta sociologii, 17, pp.29~45 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)