소위 비규범적인 ‘N-시키다’ 구문에 대하여
On the non-normative ‘N+shikida’
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In actual Korean language use, there is an increasing trend in the use of the so-called non-normative ‘N-shikida’, which is used instead of ‘N-hada’ without an increase in arguments. The reason for this increase of ‘N-shikida’ is that in transitive sentences, the intentionality of the subject was emphasized over the passive object, which confused it with the causative action of the agent and applied it to an expanded extent. These non-normative ‘N-shikida’ are used when the root noun N has a phase that implies a change in situation in a transitive verb phrase in which the subject appears as the agent and the action is actively directed toward the object. In normative causative sentences, the subjective action of the agent subject changes the situation with intention, so in transitive sentences where the subject appears as the agent, the semantic characteristics of the root of the verb that shows the intentionality of the subject and the aspect in which that intention is realized are similar to those of the causative expression. This confuses and is indicated by the use of the non-normative 'N-shikida' sentence. The object of the non-normative ‘N-shikida’, a transitive verb, is the thematic role of the predicate and has a similar function to the object in a causative sentence. The predicate has the root N of [continuous + conclusive] aspect, revealing the same meaning as a transitive verb expressing an intransitive action.
Abstract
In actual Korean language use, there is an increasing trend in the use of the so-called non-normative ‘N-shikida’, which is used instead of ‘N-hada’ without an increase in arguments. The reason for this increase of ‘N-shikida’ is that in transitive sentences, the intentionality of the subject was emphasized over the passive object, which confused it with the causative action of the agent and applied it to an expanded extent. These non-normative ‘N-shikida’ are used when the root noun N has a phase that implies a change in situation in a transitive verb phrase in which the subject appears as the agent and the action is actively directed toward the object. In normative causative sentences, the subjective action of the agent subject changes the situation with intention, so in transitive sentences where the subject appears as the agent, the semantic characteristics of the root of the verb that shows the intentionality of the subject and the aspect in which that intention is realized are similar to those of the causative expression. This confuses and is indicated by the use of the non-normative 'N-shikida' sentence. The object of the non-normative ‘N-shikida’, a transitive verb, is the thematic role of the predicate and has a similar function to the object in a causative sentence. The predicate has the root N of [continuous + conclusive] aspect, revealing the same meaning as a transitive verb expressing an intransitive action.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강범모, "어휘 의미 정보의 구조와 표상-한국어 명사 의미를 중심으로-", 한국어 의미학, 5, pp.83~118 (1999), 한국어의미학회
- 강범모, "서술 명사의 기준과 의미 구조", 언어와 정보, 4(1), pp.71~83 (2000), 한국언어정보학회
- 권재일, "한국어 통사론" (2000), 민음사
- 김건희, "사동문의 타동성에 대하여 -‘(X)시키다’ 사동과 ‘사동사’ 사동을 중심으로-", 어문학, (160), pp.5~50 (2023), 한국어문학회
- 김성주, "‘-시키-’ 동사의 유형과 국어의 사동문", 국어국문학, 132, pp.5~22 (2003), 국어국문학회
- 김형배, "한국어 사동사 연구" (1997), 박이정
- 노명희, "한자어 서술성 명사의 태와 논항 구조", 國語學, (106), pp.3~32 (2023), 국어학회[DOI]
- 노명희, "‘화(化)’ 파생어의 논항 구조", 국제어문, (95), pp.39~63 (2022), 국제어문학회
- 박병수, "사동 구문의 정보 기반적 분석", 언어연구, 13, pp.1~12 (1995)
- 박소영, "한국어 사동문의 의미 해석과 통사구조", 한국어학, 59, pp.169~201 (2013), 한국어학회
- 서종학, "‘시키-’의 통사와 의미에 대하여", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (58), pp.209~237 (2011), 한민족어문학회
- 양명희, "피동사 ‘N+되다’와 ‘N+받다’에 대한 연구", 반교어문연구, (58), pp.111~135 (2021), 반교어문학회
- 양정호, "‘X시키다’의 論項 構造에 대한 一考察", 어문연구(語文硏究), 47(4), pp.5~36 (2019), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 연재훈, "타동성의 정의를 위한 원형이론적 접근", 언어, 22(1), pp.107~132 (1997)
- 유경민, "‘X하-’와 ‘X되-’ 및 ‘X시키-’의 대응쌍 연구", 國語學, (46), pp.147~182 (2005), 국어학회
- 유혜원, "'-하다' 와 동일한 논항을 갖는 '-시키다' 구문 연구", 우리어문연구, (42), pp.121~147 (2012), 우리어문학회
- 이병규, "한국어 술어명사문 문법" (2009), 박이정
- 이상억, "국어의 사동․ 피동 구문 연구" (1999), 집문당
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이정민, "Abstract Syntax of Korean with Reference to English" (1974), 범한서적
- 이정택, "사동의 개념", 先淸語文, 27, pp.781~797 (1999), 서울대학교 국어교육과
- 이정택, "피동의 개념과 피동 서술어", 한국어학, (22), pp.335~354 (2004), 한국어학회
- 이정택, "두 가지 유형의 {시키}", 한말연구, (16), pp.175~195 (2005), 한말연구학회
- 이지수(李智秀), "타동성과 국어 사동표현의 의미", 어문연구(語文硏究), 36(2), pp.145~170 (2008), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 임창국, "논항을 추가하지 않는 ‘-시키다’ 사동", 언어, 42(4), pp.885~902 (2017), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 정성여, "규범적 사동구문과 비규범적 사동구문", 어학연구, 41(1), pp.49~78 (2005), 언어교육원
- 한선혜, "'명사-시키다' 구성과 사전에서의 처리", 한국사전학, 4, pp.185~221 (2004), 한국사전학회
- 허철구, "조어법의 ‘시키-’에 관한 몇 문제", 서강어문, 14, pp.101~131 (1998), 서강어문학회
- Hopper, P. J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56, pp.251~299 (1980)
- Jung, Yunsun, "Interpretation of Noun Phrases and Its Syntactic and Semantic Implications", Ph. D., pp.1997
- Lyons, J., "Semantics 2" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, F. R., "문법역과 문법관계" (2000), 역락
- Shibatani, M., "Lexical versus periphrastic causative in Korean", Journal of Linguistics, 9 (1973)