‘-시키다’ 사동과 vP의 통사론
Sikhita-Causatives and the Syntax of vP
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper provides a syntactic analysis of sikhita-causatives in Korean. The argument structure of a sikhita construction changes depending on the semantic type of the verbal noun root it merges with. When combined with a root that expresses a result-state meaning, the sikhita-causative adopts a two-place argument structure, meaning ‘to make something happen’ (make-causatives). However, when paired with a root that expresses manner, it takes a three-place argument structure, meaning ‘to make someone do something’ (let-causatives). These variations in causative patterns based on root semantics are explained by the syntactic structure, where sikhita, acting as a verbalizer, merges directly with the root to form a single phasal unit. In contrast, in constructions where sikhita functions as a lexical verb, there is no variation in argument structure based on the verbal noun's semantic type. This difference is explained by a syntactic structure in which the verbal noun, independent of sikhita, forms its own phasal unit without any interaction between them.
Abstract
This paper provides a syntactic analysis of sikhita-causatives in Korean. The argument structure of a sikhita construction changes depending on the semantic type of the verbal noun root it merges with. When combined with a root that expresses a result-state meaning, the sikhita-causative adopts a two-place argument structure, meaning ‘to make something happen’ (make-causatives). However, when paired with a root that expresses manner, it takes a three-place argument structure, meaning ‘to make someone do something’ (let-causatives). These variations in causative patterns based on root semantics are explained by the syntactic structure, where sikhita, acting as a verbalizer, merges directly with the root to form a single phasal unit. In contrast, in constructions where sikhita functions as a lexical verb, there is no variation in argument structure based on the verbal noun's semantic type. This difference is explained by a syntactic structure in which the verbal noun, independent of sikhita, forms its own phasal unit without any interaction between them.
참고문헌 (32)
- 고영근, "우리말문법론" (2008), 태학사
- 권재일, "한국어 문법론" (2012), 태학사
- 김건희, "‘(X)시키다’ 사동 실현 방법 분류에 대한 재고찰", 한국어 의미학, 81, pp.71~95 (2023)
- 김성주, "‘-시키-’ 동사의 유형과 국어의 사동문", 국어국문학, 132, pp.5~29 (2003)
- 김영희, "‘-게 하-’ 사동 구문의 세 유형", 국어학, 54, pp.89~120 (1992)
- 김형배, "‘-시키다’에 의한 합성적 사동법 연구", 한말연구, 1, pp.53~79 (1995)
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1984), 탑출판사
- 박소영, "한국어 통사사동의 세 유형", 현대문법연구, 74, pp.59~76 (2013)
- 박소영, "술어 명사와 vP의 통사론 : 최기용(2012)에 대한 답변", 생성문법연구, 25(3), pp.581~601 (2015)
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판부
- 유혜원, "‘-하다’와 동일한 논항을 갖는 ‘-시키다’ 구문 연구", 우리어문연구, 42, pp.121~147 (2012)
- 임창국, "논항을 추가하지 않는 ‘-시키다’ 사동", 언어, 42(4), pp.885~902 (2017)
- 전은진, "‘명사-시키다’의 과잉 사동 표현에 관한 연구", 인문과학연구, 37, pp.203~230 (2013)
- 최기용, "‘시키-’ 사동 소고", 생성문법연구, 30(3), pp.419~431 (2020)
- 최정진, "한국어의 ‘시키다’ 사동 구문", 어문학, 134, pp.53~77 (2016)
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음사
- 한선혜, "‘명사-시키다’ 구성과 사전에서의 처리", 한국사전학, 4, pp.185~221 (2004)
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Embick, D., "On the structure of resultative participles in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3), pp.355~392 (2004)
- Embick, D., "Roots, states, and stative passives", Handout from a talk presented at the Roots Workshop (2009)
- Folli, R., "Aspectual Inquires", pp.95~120 (2005), Springer
- Harley, H., "Subjects, events and licensing", Ph. D, pp.1995
- Harley, H., "The syntax of aspect", pp.42~64 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Kratzer, A., "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer
- Larson, R., "On the double object construction", Linguistic inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1987)
- Levin, B., "Language description informed by theory", pp.337~357 (2014), John Benjamins
- Marantz, A., "Words", Ms, pp.2001
- Marantz, A., "Phases and words", ms, pp.2008
- Pylkkänen, L., "Introducing arguments" (2008), MIT Press
- Rappaport Hovav, M., "Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure", pp.21~38 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Schäfer, F., "Two types of external argument licensing", Studia Linguistica, 66, pp.128~180 (2012)
- Yu, J., "States and changes-of-state in the semantics of result roots", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 41, pp.1589~1628 (2023)