본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『捷解新語』의 「時間領域副詞」에 대하여 ―한·일 대조언어학의 관점에서―

A Study of the Time Domain Adverbs of Cheophaesineo

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This study discussed the correction and syntactic properties of time domain adverbs (TDA) found in the Japanese language textbook of Cheophaesineo. The TDA can be classified into instant adverbs, persistent adverbs, and progressive adverbs, and in all, 16 categories of terms appear 46 times. Considering the correction of each adverb, “sunawachi,”for example, is revised as “satsoku” when the semantics of “sunawachi” have changed, and it is understood as “the correction of semantic use of vocabulary.” There is one example each for “haya” and “hodonaku” corrected into “mohaya” and “yagatte,” respectively, and there is a difference in meaning when the same term is corrected and when it is not. Therefore, it was possible to identify it as “the correction for embodiment and clarification” to clarify the meaning of the initial version. Moreover, “tsuneni” is corrected as “sakigoroyori” for “correction by form syntax” to avoid misinterpretation. The cause of such correction becomes more prominent when examined with the comparative Korean and discusses the syntactic value of Cheophaesineo and the value of resources in comparative linguistics. In terms of syntactic properties, the TDA appear liberally in past tense and non-past tense sentences to show that the expression of tense or aspect was not required for better sound. Furthermore, the adverbs appear in various subordinate clauses, mostly describing highly dynamic verbs, which suggests the need to reconsider classifying the time adverbs to adverbs that correspond to tense or aspect. It is believed that the TDA specify the duration of action described by the verb that follows in a statement regardless of the sentence construction.

Abstract

This study discussed the correction and syntactic properties of time domain adverbs (TDA) found in the Japanese language textbook of Cheophaesineo. The TDA can be classified into instant adverbs, persistent adverbs, and progressive adverbs, and in all, 16 categories of terms appear 46 times. Considering the correction of each adverb, “sunawachi,”for example, is revised as “satsoku” when the semantics of “sunawachi” have changed, and it is understood as “the correction of semantic use of vocabulary.” There is one example each for “haya” and “hodonaku” corrected into “mohaya” and “yagatte,” respectively, and there is a difference in meaning when the same term is corrected and when it is not. Therefore, it was possible to identify it as “the correction for embodiment and clarification” to clarify the meaning of the initial version. Moreover, “tsuneni” is corrected as “sakigoroyori” for “correction by form syntax” to avoid misinterpretation. The cause of such correction becomes more prominent when examined with the comparative Korean and discusses the syntactic value of Cheophaesineo and the value of resources in comparative linguistics. In terms of syntactic properties, the TDA appear liberally in past tense and non-past tense sentences to show that the expression of tense or aspect was not required for better sound. Furthermore, the adverbs appear in various subordinate clauses, mostly describing highly dynamic verbs, which suggests the need to reconsider classifying the time adverbs to adverbs that correspond to tense or aspect. It is believed that the TDA specify the duration of action described by the verb that follows in a statement regardless of the sentence construction.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 김기민, "捷解新語의 改修過程과 語彙硏究", pp.249~ (2004), 보고사
  2. 南廣祐, "古語辭典", pp.622~ (1960), 敎學社
  3. 劉昌惇(1964, "李朝語辭典", pp.1174~ (1964), 延世大學校 出版部
  4. 박재환, "『捷解新語』の副詞研究", pp.19~20 (2003), J&C
  5. 李鍾姬, "『捷解新語』における副詞の研究", 博士, pp.2005
  6. 이종희, "『捷解新語』의 「時間副詞」에 대하여-「順序副詞」를 중심으로-", 일어일문학연구, 63(1), pp.449~466 (2007), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  7. 이태영, "譯註 捷解新語", pp.19~354 (1997), 太學士
  8. 林昌奎, "月刊 言語 2", pp.116~121 (1998), 大修館書店
  9. 鄭 光, "譯學書硏究", pp.428~475 (2002), J&C
  10. 조남덕, "捷解新語의 改修分析", pp.81~148 (1994), 書光學術資料社
  11. 지경래, "『捷解新語』의 일본어 어휘 연구", pp.184~ (2002), 전남대학교 출판부
  12. 한미경, "『捷解新語』における敬語研究Ⅰ․Ⅱ", pp.4~6 (1995), 박이정출판사
  13. 梅田博之, "21세기 국어학의 과제", pp.39~60 (2000), 도서출판 月印
  14. 小倉進平, "増訂朝鮮語学史", pp.414~434 (1964), 西田書店
  15. 金水敏, "日本語の文法 2 時・否定の取り立て", pp.10~ (2000), 岩波書店
  16. 辻星児, "朝鮮語史における『捷解新語』", 16, pp.31~42 (1997), 岡山大学文学部
  17. 土井忠生, "那訳 日葡辞書", pp.589~ (1980), 岩波書店
  18. 中右実, "日英語比較講座 第2巻 文法", pp.165~ (1980), 大修館書店
  19. 中田祝夫他, "古語大辞典", pp.886~ (1985), 小学館
  20. 中村栄考, "日朝関係史の研究下", pp.397~422 (1969)
  21. 仁田義雄, "副詞的表現の諸相", pp.201~206 (2002), くろしお出版
  22. 日本大辞典刊行会, "『日本国語大事典』第7巻", pp.1009~1010 (1981), 小学館
  23. 浜田敦, "朝鮮資料による日本語研究", pp.309~318 (1970), 岩波書店
  24. 浜田敦, "續朝鮮資料による日本語研究", pp.209~228 (1983), 臨川書店
  25. 増岡陸志, "基礎日本語文法", pp.41~42 (1989), くろしお出版
  26. 松村明, "大辞林", pp.1354~ (1995), 三省堂
  27. 南不二男, "現代日本語文法の輪郭", pp.54~ (1993), 大修館書店
  28. 森田武, "三本対照捷解新語 釈文・索引・改題編", pp.209~337 (1973), 京都大学
  29. 安田章, "朝鮮資料と中世国語", pp.24~39 (1980), 笠間書院

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)