본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

방화죄에 있어 ‘공공위험’의 의미

The Definition of Public Danger in Crimes of Arson

박상진
한국비교형사법학회 (Korean Association Of Comparative Criminal Law)|2011.12|비교형사법연구 (Korean Journal of Comparative Criminal Law)|제13권 제2호|pp. 137-157|DOI 10.23894/kjccl.2011.13.2.007

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

방화죄ArsonBurning연소공공의 위험내화성 건조물Public Danger독일형법예비초안Vorentwurf zu einem Deutschen Strafgesetzbuchfire-resistant structures
주제분류법학

초록

This paper presents the definition of “public danger” in crimes of arson. “The crime of public danger” is a type with regard to a social benefit and protection of the law. The representative crime of public danger is arson. Article 166(2) and Article 167(1) of the Criminal Act require “causes public danger.” In other words, for example, Article 167(1) is required to ‘cause public danger’ as a constituent requirement providing, “A person who sets fire to and burns an object other than those objects mentioned in the preceding three Articles.” However, the definition of the ‘public danger’ is ambiguous. ‘Public’ and ‘danger’ are substantially abstract. The court has interpreted that ‘public danger’ in Article 167(1) implies “concerned states causing any danger to the life, body, and property of many unspecified persons.” However, it is still uncertain that ‘many unspecified persons’ respond to ‘public’ and ‘concerned states causing any danger’ are relative to ‘danger’ Furthermore, the definition of ‘public danger’ should be reexamined in regards to its fundamental punishment evidence because recently, a generalization of fire-resistant structures due to development of construction techniques means qualitative changes of crimes of arson. As a result, this paper explores the definition of ‘public danger’ and ‘concrete scope for establishing crime of public danger with respect to crimes of arson. To begin, this paper examines a legislative history in Germany and Japan with regards to the origin of ‘crime of public danger (Ⅱ) and the specific definition of ‘public danger’ (Ⅲ).

Abstract

This paper presents the definition of “public danger” in crimes of arson. “The crime of public danger” is a type with regard to a social benefit and protection of the law. The representative crime of public danger is arson. Article 166(2) and Article 167(1) of the Criminal Act require “causes public danger.” In other words, for example, Article 167(1) is required to ‘cause public danger’ as a constituent requirement providing, “A person who sets fire to and burns an object other than those objects mentioned in the preceding three Articles.” However, the definition of the ‘public danger’ is ambiguous. ‘Public’ and ‘danger’ are substantially abstract. The court has interpreted that ‘public danger’ in Article 167(1) implies “concerned states causing any danger to the life, body, and property of many unspecified persons.” However, it is still uncertain that ‘many unspecified persons’ respond to ‘public’ and ‘concerned states causing any danger’ are relative to ‘danger’ Furthermore, the definition of ‘public danger’ should be reexamined in regards to its fundamental punishment evidence because recently, a generalization of fire-resistant structures due to development of construction techniques means qualitative changes of crimes of arson. As a result, this paper explores the definition of ‘public danger’ and ‘concrete scope for establishing crime of public danger with respect to crimes of arson. To begin, this paper examines a legislative history in Germany and Japan with regards to the origin of ‘crime of public danger (Ⅱ) and the specific definition of ‘public danger’ (Ⅲ).

참고문헌 (56)

  1. "대구고법 1979.1.24. 78노941", ~
  2. 배종대, "형법각론(제7전정판)", pp.636~
  3. Kitzinger, "Gemeingefärliche Verbrechen und Vergehen, In Vergleichende Darstellung des deutschen und ausländischen Strafrechts, B.T, Bd. 9", pp.1~ (1906)
  4. K.Binding, "Lehrbuch des gemeinen deutschen Strafrechts B.T., Bd.2,Abt. 1.2. Aufl", pp.2~ (1904)
  5. R.v. Hippel, "Deutsches Strafrecht, Bd. 1", pp.314~ (1925)
  6. H.Radtke, "Die Dogmatik der Brandstiftungsdelikte", 88~ (1998)
  7. 岡本勝, "放火罪と公共の危險(2)(3)", 法學, 52(4), pp.1~ (1988)
  8. Goltdamner, "Die Materialien zum Strafgesetzbuch für die Preußischen Staaten. Teil Ⅱ", 640~ (1852)
  9. Vgl. G. Beseler, "Kommenntar über das Strafgesetzbuch für die Preußischen Staaten", 523~ (1851)
  10. "RGBl. 1871, Nr 24", 127~
  11. Kitzinger S, "5; Vorentwurf zu einem Deutschen Strafgesetzbuch, Begründung, Bes.T. Bearbeitet von der hierzu bestellten Sachrerständigen=Kommission", 599~ (1909)
  12. "Entwurf eines Strafgesetzbuch (E 1962) mit Begründung", 495~
  13. "Motive zu dem Entwurfe eines Strafgesetzbuches für den Norddeutschen Bund", 180~ (1869)
  14. "Entwurf der Strafrechts kommission", ~ (1913)
  15. "Amtllicher Entwurf eines Allgemeine Deutschen Strafgesetzbuchs nebst Begrundung", 106~ (1925)
  16. H.Radtke, "Das Ende der Gemeingefährlichkeit? - Die Brandstiftung nach dem Entwurf eines Sechsten Gesetzes zur Reform des Strafrechts(6. StrRG)", ~ (1997)
  17. 星周一郞, "放火罪の理論", pp.49~ (2004), 東京大學出版會
  18. 허일태, "일본형법이론사의 종합적 연구", pp.20~ (2009), 동아대학교 출판부
  19. 박상진, "미국에 있어 커먼로상의 방화와 제정법상의 방화죄에 대한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 12(1), pp.355~375 (2010), 한국비교형사법학회
  20. 江木衷, "改正增補刑法各論(第2版)", pp.3~ (1889)
  21. 岡田朝太郎, "刑法講義全(刑法各論)", pp.34~395 (1903)
  22. 勝本勘三郎, "刑法析義各論之部上卷(第4版)", pp.191~ (1901)
  23. 龜山貞義, "刑法講義卷之2", pp.535~632 (1897)
  24. "刑錄8輯 11号", 97~
  25. 星周一郞, "放火罪の理論", 69~
  26. "刑錄 7輯", 655~
  27. 牧野英一, "改訂增補刑法通義全(第21版)", pp.198~ (1910)
  28. "刑錄22輯", 1359~
  29. 牧野英一, "日本刑法", 407~414 (1917)
  30. 泉二新熊, "日本刑法理論下卷(各論)(增補 第40版)", pp.148~171 (1929)
  31. "대판 1970.3.24, 70도330", ~
  32. "대판 2007.3.16, 2006도9164", ~
  33. "대판 2002.3.26, 2001도6641", ~
  34. 김일수, "형법각론(제5판)", pp.555~
  35. 이재상, "형법각론(제5판)", pp.501~
  36. 임웅, "형법각론", pp.504~ (2002)
  37. 정성근, "형법각론", pp.516~ (2002)
  38. 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)", pp.470~
  39. R.v.Frank, "Das Strafgesetzbuch für das Deutsche Reich, 18 Aufl", pp.720~ (1931)
  40. H Hälschner, "Das gemeine deutsche Strafrecht, Bd.2, Abt. 2", pp.603~ (1887)
  41. F.v Liszt, "Lehrbuch des Deutschen Strafrcchts, 2. Aufl", pp.452~ (1884)
  42. Schaper, "Gemeingefährliche Verbrechen und Vergehen, In Handbuch des deutschen Strafrechts", pp.861~ (1874)
  43. J.Olshausen, "Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch für das Deutsche Reich, 2. Bd., 8. Auf1, §312 Rdn. 4" (1910)
  44. W.Rosenberg, "Ebermeyer-Lobe-Rosenberg, Reichs=Strafgesetzbuch(Leipziger Kommentar), 4.Aufl., vorb. §306 Rdn. 3" (1929)
  45. A.Finger, "Begriff der Gefahr und Gemeingefahr im Strafrecht, in Festgabe für Reinhard von Frank zum 70, Geburtstag, Bd 1", pp.249~ (1930)
  46. E. Kohlrausch, "Strafgesetzbuch. 34 Aufl", pp.518~ (1938)
  47. A.F.Berner, "Lehrbuch des Detschen Strafrechtes, 18. Aufl", pp.633~ (1898)
  48. M.Weiss, "Die gemeingefährlichen Delikte des Reichsstrafgesetzbuchs", 30~ (1902)
  49. "라이히최고법원 1883년 9월 29일 판결(RGRspr. 5, 557)", ~
  50. "1885년 10월 13일 판결(RGRspr. 7, 577)", ~
  51. 本庄 武, , 一橋論叢, 133(1), pp.43~ (2005)
  52. 星周一郞, "公共危險犯の現代的意義", 刑法雜誌, 48(2), pp.16~
  53. H.Wolff, "StGB Leipziger Kommentar, 11. Aufl., 25, Lfg., §312 Rdn.l" (1997)
  54. 井田良, "放火罪をめぐる最新の論点, In 刑法基本講座6卷", pp.185~ (1993)
  55. 島田 聰一郎, "放火罪の故意と公共危險の認識", 現代刑事法, (51), pp.42~43 (2003)
  56. 岡本勝, "危險犯をめぐる諸問題, In 犯罪論と刑法思想", pp.96~ (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

방화죄에 있어 공공위험의 인식박상진법학연구소 · 홍익법학2012 · 제13권 제1호방화죄에서 「소훼(燒毁)」의 개념에 대한 연혁적 고찰이진수한국형사법학회 · 형사법연구2018 · 제30권 제3호불능미수의 위험성오영근법학연구원 · 법학논총2010 · 제27권 제4호형법 제27조(불능범)에서 “결과발생의 불가능”과 “위험성”표지의 구별기준한상훈한국형사법학회 · 형사법연구2008 · 제20권 제3호현주건조물등방화죄의 해석상 몇 가지 논점에 대한 연구박상진법학연구소 · 홍익법학2013 · 제14권 제1호화재사건에 있어서 형사법적 쟁점의 검토권창국한국형사정책학회 · 형사정책2010 · 제22권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (37건)

해석근거로서의 ‘법질서의 통일성’과 ‘형법의 독자성’변종필pp. 1-18과실범의 “정상의 주의”의 전제조건과 형법의 일반원칙김성돈pp. 19-40사형제도에 관한 법철학적인 고찰손미숙pp. 41-62강간죄 등 성폭력범죄의 구성요건에 대한 재검토 - 개정 아동청소년성보호법 및 성폭력특례법에 대한 비판적 검토와 함께 -김혜정pp. 63-87소비자 불매운동의 정당성 - 헌법적 허용한계와 형법적 규제의 타당성-우희숙pp. 89-111
원문 보기