불능미수의 위험성
The Meaning of Dangerousness in the Korean Criminal Act §27
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean Criminal Act §27 describes “Even though the occurrence of a crime is impossible because of the means adopted for the commission of the crime or because of the mistake of object, the punishment shall be imposed if there exists a dangerousness. But the punishment may be mitigated or remitted”. From the point of comparative study, the contents of the Korean Criminal Act §27, is very unique. That means, there is few countries which have such a provision like the Korean Criminal Act §27. So there have been so many competing opinions surrounding the meaning of dangerousness and that of impossiblity of crime occurrence. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a reasonable way of construing the concept of dangerousness and that of impossibility of crime occurrence after analysing the many competing opinions. The contents of this paper is as follows :Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. The Comparative and Historical Approach to Korean Criminal Act §271. The Comparative Approach (1) The Comparative Study with German Criminal Law (2) The Comparative Study with Japanese Criminal Law (3) The Comparative Study with Some Other Countries (4) Implications 2. The History and the Legislator’s Pupose of the Korean Criminal Act §27III. The Opinions surrounding the Meaning of Dangerousness in §271. The Opinion of Same Meaning with General Attempt 2. The Opinions of Different Meaning with General Attempt IV. Desirable Solution 1. Basic Approach 2. The Meaning of the Impossibility of Crime Occurrence 3. The Menaing of the Dangerousness V. Case Study and Conclusion
Abstract
The Korean Criminal Act §27 describes “Even though the occurrence of a crime is impossible because of the means adopted for the commission of the crime or because of the mistake of object, the punishment shall be imposed if there exists a dangerousness. But the punishment may be mitigated or remitted”. From the point of comparative study, the contents of the Korean Criminal Act §27, is very unique. That means, there is few countries which have such a provision like the Korean Criminal Act §27. So there have been so many competing opinions surrounding the meaning of dangerousness and that of impossiblity of crime occurrence. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a reasonable way of construing the concept of dangerousness and that of impossibility of crime occurrence after analysing the many competing opinions. The contents of this paper is as follows :Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. The Comparative and Historical Approach to Korean Criminal Act §271. The Comparative Approach (1) The Comparative Study with German Criminal Law (2) The Comparative Study with Japanese Criminal Law (3) The Comparative Study with Some Other Countries (4) Implications 2. The History and the Legislator’s Pupose of the Korean Criminal Act §27III. The Opinions surrounding the Meaning of Dangerousness in §271. The Opinion of Same Meaning with General Attempt 2. The Opinions of Different Meaning with General Attempt IV. Desirable Solution 1. Basic Approach 2. The Meaning of the Impossibility of Crime Occurrence 3. The Menaing of the Dangerousness V. Case Study and Conclusion
참고문헌 (33)
- 권오걸, "형법총론" (2009), 형설출판사
- 김성돈, "형법총론, 제2판" (2010), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김일수, "한국형법 II" (1997), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
- 백원기, "미수론연구" (1995), 삼지원
- 법무부, "형법개정법률안제안이유서", ~ (1992)
- 신동운, "형법총론, 제2판" (2009), 법문사
- 오영근, "형법총론, 제2판" (2010), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2010), 박영사
- 임웅, "형법총론, 제3판" (2009), 법문사
- 한국형사정책연구원, "형법제정자료집", ~ (1991)
- 일본형법개정작업경과와 내용, "형사법개정특별심의위원회", 법무부, ~ (1989)
- 大谷 實, "刑法講義總論, 第3版" (1993), 成文堂
- 平場安治, "刑法改正の硏究 1" (1974), 東京大學出版會
- 김용욱, "가능미수와 불능미수의 구분. in: 형사판례의 연구 I(지송 이재상 교수 화갑기념논문집)" (2003), 박영사
- 김일수, "미수의 불법귀속에 관한 연구 : 특히 불능미수를 중심으로", 고려법학, (40) (2003)
- 김호기, "불능미수에서의 착오, 결과발생의 불가능, 위험성", 비교형사법연구, 9(1), pp.73~96 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 도중진, "불능미수의 위험성", 형사판례의 연구 I(지송 이재상 교수 화갑기념논문집) (2003)
- 문채규, "형법 제27조(불능범)의 ＂위험성＂ 표지", 비교형사법연구, 8(2), pp.31~58 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 신동운, "불능범에 관한 형법 제27조의 성립경위", 서울대학교 법학, 41(4) (2001)
- 오영근, "일본 개정형법가안에 관한 일고찰", 형사정책연구, 10(1) (1999)
- 오영근, "일본개정형법가안이 제정형법에 미친 영향과 현행 형법해석론의 문제점", 형사법연구, (20), pp.109~140 (2003), 한국형사법학회
- 이승준, "형법 제27조(불능범) 논의의 재검토", 형사정책연구, 18(4), pp.29~60 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이용식, "부작위범의 불능미수 - 미수범의 객관적 구성요건 정립을 위한 생각의 작은 단초 -", 서울대학교 법학, 47(4), pp.240~267 (2006), 법학연구소
- 임광주, "미수범의 유형에 대한 근본적인 재검토", 법학논총, 26(3), pp.125~141 (2009), 법학연구소
- 정영일, "불능미수의 불법구조에 관한 재검토", 형사정책연구, 20(3), pp.61~85 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 천진호, "불능미수의 위험성 판단－해석상의 오류를 중심으로－", 비교형사법연구, (창간) (1999)
- 林 弘正(Hayasi Hiromasa), "｢개정형법가안｣의 성립과정 고찰", 형사정책연구, 19(4), pp.347~365 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 한상훈, "형법 제27조(불능범)에서 “결과발생의 불가능”과 “위험성”표지의 구별기준", 형사법연구, 20(3), pp.79~109 (2008), 한국형사법학회
- 한정환, "형법 제27조의 취지？요건？적용기준", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.549~568 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 허일태, "엄상섭 선생의 형법사상과 형법이론. in: 효당 엄상섭 형법논집" (1993), 서울대학교출판부
- 홍영기, "불능미수의 가능성 표지 - 장애미수와 불능미수의 구별 요건 -", 형사법연구, 20(1), pp.55~74 (2008)
- 藤木英雄, "刑法講義 總論" (1988), 弘文堂