아베 내각 집단적 자위권 용인논리의 비판적 고찰 -「안보법제간담회」논의를 중심으로-
A Critical Review on the Abe Cabinet’s Arguments for Collective Self-Defense Rights-Focusing on the discussion on 「Reconstruction of the legal basis for security」-
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Abe Cabinet's approval of Collective Self-Defense Rights is a very sensitive issue in Northeast Asia, characterized by high military tensions, the Asia's Paradox, and the security dilemma. This paper reviewed the reports of the first and second discussions on Reconstruction of the legal basis for security, which played a key role in entitling Japan to exercise collective self-defense rights, and criticized the Abe Cabinet's justifications for collective self-defense rights. It criticized the Abe cabinet's perception of collective self-defense rights as a deterrent to war and thus reduction in arms race, pointed to their distortion of the right to live in peace, and revealed their distorted perspectives of history. It is not desirable to tolerate Japan's exercise of collective self-defense rights because it directly affects the peace and security in Northeast Asia and Korea. The governments and societies should give voice to peace-building based on universal values such as peace with human rights.
Abstract
The Abe Cabinet's approval of Collective Self-Defense Rights is a very sensitive issue in Northeast Asia, characterized by high military tensions, the Asia's Paradox, and the security dilemma. This paper reviewed the reports of the first and second discussions on Reconstruction of the legal basis for security, which played a key role in entitling Japan to exercise collective self-defense rights, and criticized the Abe Cabinet's justifications for collective self-defense rights. It criticized the Abe cabinet's perception of collective self-defense rights as a deterrent to war and thus reduction in arms race, pointed to their distortion of the right to live in peace, and revealed their distorted perspectives of history. It is not desirable to tolerate Japan's exercise of collective self-defense rights because it directly affects the peace and security in Northeast Asia and Korea. The governments and societies should give voice to peace-building based on universal values such as peace with human rights.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김태운, "탈냉전기 중ㆍ러 협력이 동북아 정세에 미치는 영향", 국제지역연구, 11(2), pp.698~714 (2007), 국제지역학회
- 박영준, "아베정권의 '수정주의적 보통국가화'와 동북아정세", 정세와 정책, pp.13~ (2013), 세종연구소
- 박한규, "탈냉전 이후 미중관계와 향후 전망: 갈등과 협조의 이중주(二重奏)", 사회과학연구, 25(1), pp.127~147 (2014), 사회과학연구소
- 설인효, "중국 국방백서 분석: 평화 공세와 군사적 부상의 정당화", 신아세아, 19(4), pp.192~225 (2012), 신아시아연구소
- 정재흥, "중국의 군사력 증강에 따른 지역 안보질서 변화 고찰", 군사논단, 70 (2012), 한국군사학회
- 豊下楢彦, "集團的自衛權とは何か", pp.5~ (2007), 岩波書店
- 奥平康弘, "集団的自衛権の何が問題か: 解釈改憲批判", pp.130~ (2014), 岩波書店
- 浅野善治, "憲法答弁集(1947-1999)", 信山社, pp.85~86 (2003)
- 保阪正康, "安倍首相の歷史観を問う", pp.17~18 (2015), 講談社
- 半田滋, "日本は戰爭をするのか: 集團的自衛權と自衛隊", pp.59~60 (2014), 岩波書店
- 渡辺治, "大國への執念安倍政權と日本の危機", pp.155~156 (2014), 大月書店
- 山田邦夫, "自衛権の論点『憲法の論點シリ―ズ⑫』", pp.2~ (2006), 國立國會圖書館調査及び立法考查局
- 樋口陽一, "安倍流改憲にNOを!", pp.40~41 (2015), 岩波書店
- 浦部法穂, "浦部法穂の憲法時評" (2014), 法学館憲法研究所
- 小林武, "いま日本國憲法は", pp.122~127 (2009), 法律文化社
- 元山健, "現代日本の憲法", pp.147~148 (2009), 法律文化社
- 水島朝穂, "徹底分析! 集団的自衛権", pp.36~ (2015), 岩波書店
- 現代憲法敎育硏究會, "憲法とそれぞれの人權", pp.187~ (2010), 法律文化社
- 星野安三郎, "日本國憲法史考", pp.5~10 (1962), 法律文化社
- "Quadrennial Defense Review", 4~16
- Ross Robert, "The problem with the Pivot", Foreign Affairs, 91(6), pp.70~82 (2012)
- "第186回国会答弁書答弁書第六七号", ~
- "安倍内閣総理大臣の所信についての演説", 第165回国会第3号, ~
- "第19回国会衆議院外務委員会議録第57号", ~
- "第132回国会(本会議)会衆議院会議録第35号", ~
- 安全保障の法的基盤の再構築に関する懇談会, , ~ (2008)
- 安全保障の法的基盤の再構築に関する懇談会, , ~ (2014)
- 日本国憲法に関する調査報告書, , 参議院憲法調査会, ~ (2005)