본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본의 ‘죽도’ 고유영토론 날조에 관한 분석 - 일본의회의사록을 중심으로 -

Japan's "Takedhima" Native Territorial Fabrication - Focusing on the minutes of the Japanese Parliament -

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

本研究は日本の竹島固有領土論の捏造に注目している。まず、独島は韓日両国の古文献を見ると、独島は韓国固有の領土と呼ぶにふさわしい。これを見ても、独島は日本固有の領土ではない。 日本は1956年頃から、独島を日本固有の領土だと主張し始めた。そのきっかけは1956年、日ソ共同宣言で日本が北方領土を固有領土だと主張し、これを独島にも適用した。日本政府が1962年の韓日会談の過程で本格的に独島を固有領土だと主張した。日本政府が韓日協定で独島領有権を解決しようという主張に韓国が反対したからだ。 第二に、日本政府は独島が日本固有の領土であるため、国際司法裁判所に独島問題を委託して解決することを韓国政府に申し入れた。韓国政府は日本の要求を断った。むしろ韓国政府は、独島が韓国固有の領土であるため、日本に領有権を絶対に譲歩できないという強硬な立場だった。そのため日本政府内部では、韓日両国が独島の領有権を共有する方式で問題を解決しようと主張した。これは当然、韓国政府は受け入れられない案だった。しかし、特に日本の野党専門委員らは、日本政府の共有論の主張を強く批判した。最終的に独島共有論は消え、国際司法裁判所で独島問題を解決することもなかった。結局、両国は韓日協定で密談として「相互交換覚書」に独島の名称を明示しないまま、懸案問題を平和的に解決するということを明示した。その代わり、韓国が独島を実効的に管轄統治している実際の状況を認める方法により、独島問題を収拾した。そして日本は、韓日協定と同時に締結した韓日漁業協定で平和線を撤廃する代わりに、韓国に対し独島周辺12海里全館水域を認めた。 第三に、1965年の日韓基本条約の直後から日本政府が韓国に認めた12カイリ前管水域の措置を非難し、韓日漁業協定を改正し、独島が日本固有の領土であるため、12海里領海を確保すべきであると主張した。

Abstract

This study sheds light on the fabrication of Japan's Jukdo native English debate. First, Dokdo is appropriate to be called Korea's own territory if you look at the ancient documents of both Korea and Japan. Looking at this, Dokdo is not Japan's own territory. Japan began claiming Dokdo as its own territory around 1956. In the 1956 Japan claimed that the northern territories were its own territory in the 1956 Japan-Soviet Joint Declaration, and then applied them to Dokdo Island. During the 1962 Korea-Japan talks, the Japanese government insisted that Dokdo be given its own territory in earnest. This is because South Korea opposed the Japanese government's claim to resolve the sovereignty of Dokdo in the Korea-Japan agreement. Second, the Japanese government proposed to the Korean government to entrust the International Court of Justice to solve the Dokdo issue because Dokdo is Japan's own territory. The Korean government rejected Japan's request. On the contrary, the Korean government was in a tough position that it could never give up its sovereignty to Japan because Dokdo is Korea's own territory. Therefore, the Japanese government insisted that the two countries should solve the problem by sharing the sovereignty of Dokdo. This, of course, was unacceptable to the Korean government. However, in particular, Japanese opposition party members strongly criticized the Japanese government's claim to share. Finally, the theory of Dokdo sharing disappeared, and the International Court of Justice did not resolve the Dokdo issue. In the end, the two countries stated in the Korea-Japan agreement that they would solve the pending issues peacefully without specifying the name of Dokdo in the memorandum of exchange between them. Instead, the Dokdo issue was resolved by acknowledging the actual situation in which Korea effectively controls Dokdo. In addition, instead of abolishing the peace line in the Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement signed at the same time as the Korea-Japan Agreement, Japan recognized Korea's entire waters of 12 nautical miles around Dokdo. Third, immediately after the 1965 Korea-Japan Agreement, the Japanese government criticized the 12-nautical zone measures recognized by Korea. It was argued that the Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement should be revised to secure 12 nautical miles of territorial waters because Dokdo is Japan's own territory.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 곽진오, "일본의 독도고유영토주장에 대한 고찰 ─ 일본의회를 중심으로 ─", 일본학보, (120), pp.205~223 (2019), 한국일본학회[DOI]
  2. 김호동, "일본의 독도 ‘고유영토설’ 비판", 민족문화논총, (49), pp.329~356 (2011), 민족문화연구소
  3. 도시환, "일본의 독도영유권 주장과 일제식민지책임의 국제법적 검토", 독도연구, (23), pp.59~97 (2017), 독도연구소
  4. 박병섭, "韓日両国の独島", 竹島固有領土論の争点, 2018, pp.(25), 111~156[DOI]
  5. 최장근, "미국의 영토 형성과 독도 고유영토론에 대한 인식 -미국의 ‘영토팽창론’를 중심으로-", 일어일문학, (62), pp.395~414 (2014), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
  6. 박병섭, "일본정부의 독도 고유영토론에 관한 역사학적 검증", 동북아역사논총, (62), pp.281~323 (2018), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
  7. 박배근, "독도에 대한 일본의 영역권원주장에 관한 일고 - 고유영토론과 선점론", 국제법학회논총, 50(3), pp.99~122 (2005), 대한국제법학회
  8. 서인원, "1950년대 일본 고유영토설의 정치적 분쟁화 모순점에 대한고찰", 영토해양연구, (15), pp.6~47 (2018), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
  9. 제성호, "독도와 고유영토론 - 국제법적 시각에서 -", 법조, 64(12), pp.104~142 (2015), 법조협회[DOI]
  10. 최장근, "일본의회 의사록이인정하는 ‘다케시마’가 아닌 한국영토 독도", pp.187~207 (2014), 제이앤씨
  11. 최장근, "고유영토론을 위한 ‘우산도’가 칙령41호 ‘석도’로 전환되는 독도명칭에 관한 논증", 일어일문학연구, 90(2), pp.283~300 (2014), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  12. 伊東巳代治, "帝國版圖", 国会圖書館所蔵 「伊東巳代治関係文書」 42, ~
  13. 羽場久美, "尖閣·竹島をめぐる「固有の領土」論の危うさ", 世界, 43~ (2013)
  14. 和田春樹, "領土問題をどう解決するか", pp.32~ (2012), 平凡社新書
  15. 外務省, "日韓国交正常化交渉の記録", XV~162
  16. 外務省, "尖閣諸島", 6~ (2014)
  17. 木村幹, "池内敏著『竹島問題とは何か』", 東洋史研究, 72(4), pp.111~ (2014)
  18. 外務省, "われらの北方領土", pp.4~ (2015)
  19. 島根県竹島問題研究会, "竹島問題100問100答", pp.29~ (2014), ワック
  20. 下條正男, "竹島問題に関する調査研究報告書 2009年度", pp.34~ (2011)
  21. 塚本孝, "竹島領土編入(1905年)の意義について", 島嶼研究ジャーナル, 3(2), pp.50~ (2014)
  22. 朴炳渉, "サンフランシスコ講和条約と千島, 竹島=独島問題(2)", 北東アジア文化研究, (39), pp.47~ (2014)
  23. 山辺健太郎, "竹島問題の歴史的考察", コリア評論, 7(2), pp.4~ (1965)
  24. "国会会議録検索システム"[URL]
  25. "竹島(외무성)"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)