해적행위의 처벌에 대한 비판적 고찰과 형법개정을 위한 제언
Critical Review on the Penalties of Piracy and Suggestion for Revision of Criminal Code
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to consider a countermeasure against piracy in the viewpoint of criminal law and make a concrete suggestion of revision of the criminal code. Whenever discussing issues of piracy, there has always been a problem of definition because each nation provides a piracy different , and its meaning is ambiguous. Piracy is divided into the narrow definition which is provided in United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982("UNCLOS") and the wide definition which is in accord with the changed international environment. Because the piracy is involved in the universal jurisdiction by UNCLOS article 105 which provides that "every State may seize a pirate ship" on the high seas, it is reasonable to follow the narrow definition of piracy in the UNCLOS. However, this definition does not sufficiently consider today's diverse and complex types of piracy. Therefore it is necessary to have domestic legislation with the wide definition of piracy. The blank of the universal jurisdiction that is able to occur this time must get filled up with the multilateral international treaties like the convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation. Today, a piracy is likely to be linked by means of terror. So comprehensive countermeasures have to be considered from the political, economic, military, and social aspects in order to ensure the safe sea traffic route. However, the current criminal law with robbery as the center can not meet these requirements. It is important to crack down on piracy in focus of social legal benefit. Although piracy is very complex and diversified since the criminal code enacted in 1953, criminal provisions related to piracy and pirates are never revised. So our criminal code does not sufficiently include the types of pirate crime. To satisfy the international demands, the general types of piracy with no controversy between intentional society have to be included in the criminal code. In addition, it is required to fill a gap of punishment for piracy with introduction of the universal jurisdiction in the criminal code for enlargement of its scope of application.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to consider a countermeasure against piracy in the viewpoint of criminal law and make a concrete suggestion of revision of the criminal code. Whenever discussing issues of piracy, there has always been a problem of definition because each nation provides a piracy different , and its meaning is ambiguous. Piracy is divided into the narrow definition which is provided in United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982("UNCLOS") and the wide definition which is in accord with the changed international environment. Because the piracy is involved in the universal jurisdiction by UNCLOS article 105 which provides that "every State may seize a pirate ship" on the high seas, it is reasonable to follow the narrow definition of piracy in the UNCLOS. However, this definition does not sufficiently consider today's diverse and complex types of piracy. Therefore it is necessary to have domestic legislation with the wide definition of piracy. The blank of the universal jurisdiction that is able to occur this time must get filled up with the multilateral international treaties like the convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation. Today, a piracy is likely to be linked by means of terror. So comprehensive countermeasures have to be considered from the political, economic, military, and social aspects in order to ensure the safe sea traffic route. However, the current criminal law with robbery as the center can not meet these requirements. It is important to crack down on piracy in focus of social legal benefit. Although piracy is very complex and diversified since the criminal code enacted in 1953, criminal provisions related to piracy and pirates are never revised. So our criminal code does not sufficiently include the types of pirate crime. To satisfy the international demands, the general types of piracy with no controversy between intentional society have to be included in the criminal code. In addition, it is required to fill a gap of punishment for piracy with introduction of the universal jurisdiction in the criminal code for enlargement of its scope of application.
참고문헌 (41)
- 남택삼, "해상운송에 있어서 해적행위에 관한 연구", 해양비즈니스, (4), pp.116~117 (2004)
- Halberstam, M, "Terrorism on the High Seas: The Achille Lauro, Piracy and the IMO Convention on Maritime Safety", American Journal of International Law, 82, pp.272~ (1988)
- O'Connell, D.P, "The International Law of the Sea, Vol. II", pp.966~983 (1984), Clarendon Press
- Starke, J. G, "Introduction to International Law, 9th ed", pp.267~ (1984), Butterworths
- 강정우, "海賊 團束을 둘러 싼 法的 諸 問題 檢討", 저스티스, (123), pp.209~256 (2011), 한국법학원
- 백상진, "해상안전범죄에 대한 형사법적 규제의 문제점과 개선방안", 해사법연구, 21(3), pp.301~332 (2009), 한국해사법학회
- 최석윤, "해적피해방지를 위한 형사법적 대응방안", 피해자학연구, 12(1), pp.213~230 (2004), 한국피해자학회
- 최석윤, "해적행위에 대한 법적 책임과 대응방안", 한국항해항만학회지, 29(1), pp.43~58 (2005), 한국항해항만학회
- "Paragraph 2 of the IMO Draft Code of Practice for the Investigation of the Crimes of Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships, annexed to MSC", Cir.948, 2000
- International Chamber of Commerce, International Maritime Bureau, Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships, Annual Report, 1 January - 31 December 2000, , IMB, 2~ (2001)
- Cassese, A, "International Law, 2nd ed", pp.435~436 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Reydams, Luc, "Univeral Jurisdiction - Inernational and Municipal Legal Perspective", pp.5~ (2004), Oxford University Press
- Ryngaert, Cedric, "Jurisdiction in Inernational Law", pp.101~ (2008), Oxford University Press
- Rabinovitch, Ryan P, "Universal Jurisdiction in Absentia, Vol. 279", pp.2~ (2004), The Berkeley Electronic Press
- 해적피해 방지를 위한 법률 정비방안, "목진용", 한국해양수산개발원, 1~ (2010)
- Douglas Guilfoyle, "Piracy off Somalia: UN Security Council Resolution 1816 and IMO Regional Counter-Piracy Efforts", International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(3), pp.691~ (2008)
- Peppetti, Jon D, "Building the Global Maritime Security Network: A Multinational Legal Structure to Combat Transnational Threats", Naval Law Review, 55, pp.82~ (2008)
- Whaley, Floyd, "Regional Cooperation's Unsung Success Story: Fighting Piracy in the Malacca Strait", Development Asia, 3, pp.23~ (2009)
- 최석윤, "해상테러행위에 대한 형사법적 대응방안", 해사법연구, 18(2), pp.27~47 (2006), 한국해사법학회
- 민꽃별, "해상안전범죄에 대한 국제법상 규제강화방안에 관한 연구", 2006년 해양환경안전학회 춘계학술발표회, pp.150~
- 박명섭, "해운․항만 국제테러방지를 위한 안보강화에 관한 연구", 해양비즈니스, (12), pp.39~ (2008)
- 전일수, "해적방지를 위한 국제적 동향과 우리나라 관련법제의 개선방안", 해운물류연구, (43), pp.81~ (2004), 한국해운물류학회
- 김영일, "소말리아 해적문제와 포괄적 대응전략 논의", 이슈와 논점, (62), pp.309~310 (2010), 국회입법조사처
- 오태곤, "국제법상 해적 개념 규정의 신전개", 국제법학회논총, 52(3), pp.149~175 (2007), 대한국제법학회
- 차도희, "지구화 시대 한국의 해상교통로 보호방안", 군사논단, (62), pp.139~ (2010)
- Dutton, Yvonne M, "Bring Pirates to Justice: A Case for Including Piracy within the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court", the Chicago Joural of Inernational Law, pp.8~ (2010)
- 이윤철, "해상테러의 국제법적 규제 및 국내적 대응방안", 해사법연구, 18(1), pp.195~238 (2006), 한국해사법학회
- 지상원, "항해안전에 대한 불법행위 억제협약의 국내수용 방안", 해사법연구, 14(2), pp.105~122 (2002), 한국해사법학회
- 최석윤, "해적행위에 대한 형사법적 대응방안", 형사법연구, 22(4), pp.211~230 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 김일수, "형법각론", pp.349~ (2007), 박영사
- 오영근, "형법각론", pp.384~ (2006), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)", pp.317~ (2008), 박영사
- 김성돈, "형법각론", pp.316~ (2010), 성균관대
- 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)", pp.320~ (2008), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론", pp.320~ (2010), 홍문사
- 이영란, "형법학 각론강의", pp.320~ (2010), 형설출판사
- 한남현, "형법각론", pp.341~ (2009), 법문사
- 법무부, "형법개정법률안 제안 이유서, 형사법개정자료 XIV", 172~ (1992)
- 송승은, "해적행위의 처벌에 관한 형사법상 제규정의 검토", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.171~192 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 황인수, "해적행위에 대한 처벌상의 문제점과 개선방안", 성균관법학, 22(2), pp.183~218 (2010), 법학연구소
- 옥도진, "연합대해적 작전과 재판관할권의 문제", 독도연구저널, 18, pp.65~66 (2009)