본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Symbolic Urban Architecture, Controversy, and Ordinary Practices: A Critical Architectural Geographic Narrative of Nodeulseom in Seoul

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지리학

초록

This article built on the critical architectural geography is an experimental and non-representational attempt to describe ordinary building practices, which take place in Nodeulseom, Seoul, and which defy any analytical generalization. The perspective emerged in the early 2000s by critiquing architectural semiotics ‘new’ cultural geographers pursued. Its advocates are endeavoring to present a variety of ordinary building practices, sidelining from a priori political economic and semiotic representation, The approach helps the researcher avoid any elitist ‘god-eye’ view, and instead explore and participate in the diverse and differentiated intermingling of building and ordinary lives from an on-the-ground perspective. Its association with non-representational perspectives, such as actor-network theory and performativity, also enables the examination of embodied performances and subject formations in relation to the socio-material constitution of architecture. From this perspective, this article describes my ethnographic witnesses of performative and non-performative ordinary building practices at Nodeulseom and their association with subject formations, amidst messy realities. On the basis of the observations, this article reaffirms the value of critical architectural geography in overcoming blindspots in architectural semiotics, and also suggests that it may offer a new lens that Korean urban geographers are able to critically reexamine architectural symbolism, which politicians and design professionals are obsessed with.

Abstract

This article built on the critical architectural geography is an experimental and non-representational attempt to describe ordinary building practices, which take place in Nodeulseom, Seoul, and which defy any analytical generalization. The perspective emerged in the early 2000s by critiquing architectural semiotics ‘new’ cultural geographers pursued. Its advocates are endeavoring to present a variety of ordinary building practices, sidelining from a priori political economic and semiotic representation, The approach helps the researcher avoid any elitist ‘god-eye’ view, and instead explore and participate in the diverse and differentiated intermingling of building and ordinary lives from an on-the-ground perspective. Its association with non-representational perspectives, such as actor-network theory and performativity, also enables the examination of embodied performances and subject formations in relation to the socio-material constitution of architecture. From this perspective, this article describes my ethnographic witnesses of performative and non-performative ordinary building practices at Nodeulseom and their association with subject formations, amidst messy realities. On the basis of the observations, this article reaffirms the value of critical architectural geography in overcoming blindspots in architectural semiotics, and also suggests that it may offer a new lens that Korean urban geographers are able to critically reexamine architectural symbolism, which politicians and design professionals are obsessed with.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Adey, P., "Airports, mobility and the calculative architecture of affective control", Geoforum, 39(1), pp.438~451 (2008)
  2. Agro City Seoul, "Research for Seoul Urban Agriculture Master Plan" (2013), Seoul Metropolitan Government
  3. Allen, J., "The whereabouts of power: politics, government and space, Geografiska Annaler", Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), pp.19~32 (2004)
  4. Allen, J., "Ambient power: Berlin’s Potsdamer Platz and the seductive logic of public spaces", Urban Studies, 43(2), pp.441~455 (2006)
  5. Barnes, T., "Writing Worlds: Discourse, Texts, and Metaphors in the Representation of Landscape" (1992), Routledge
  6. Baxter, R., "Regeneration London: Governance, Sustainability and Community in a Global City", pp.151~172 (2009), Routledge
  7. Borden, I., "Strangely Familiar: Narratives of Architecture in the City" (1996), Routledge
  8. Butler, J., "Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative" (1997), Routledge
  9. Central Park Management Office, "2014 Nodeul Urban Agriculture Park Management Plan" (2014), Seoul Metropolitan Government
  10. City Council, "180th Local Autonomy Committee Meeting minutes (2005. 2. 22.)" (2005), Seoul City Council
  11. Cosgrove, D., "The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design, and Use of Past Environments" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  12. Cosgrove, D., "New directions in cultural geography", Area, 19(2), pp.95~101 (1987)
  13. Crewe, L., "Tales of the unexpected: Exploring car boot sales as marginal spaces of contemporary consumption", Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 23(1), pp.39~53 (1998)
  14. Culture, "Place", pp.Routledge, Representation
  15. Goss, J., "The “Magic of the Mall”: An analysis of form, function, and meaning in the contemporary retail built environment", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 8(3), pp.18~47 (1993)
  16. Jacobs, J., "Practising architectures", Social &Cultural Geography, 12(3), pp.211~222 (2011)
  17. Jacobs, J., "A geography of big things", Cultural Geographies, 13(1), pp.1~27 (2006)
  18. Jenkins, L., "Geography and architecture: 11, Rue du Conservatoire and the permeability of buildings", Space and Culture, 5(3), pp.222~236 (2002)
  19. Kaika, M., "Architecture and crisis: re-inventing the icon, re-imag (in)ing London and re-branding the City", Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(4), pp.453~474 (2010)
  20. Kraftl, P., "Architecture", affect, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, pp.2008, 98(1)[DOI]
  21. Kraftl, P., "Geographies of architecture: The multiple lives of buildings", Geography Compass, 4(5), pp.402~415 (2010)
  22. Lee, C.-W., "Proposal for Urban Agriculture Vitalization" (2012), The Seoul Institute
  23. Lee, Jae-Youl, "Policy, Place, and People in the Making of Agro City Seoul, South Korea", Ph. D., pp.2015
  24. Lees, L., "A “building event” of fear: thinking through the geography of architecture", Social &Cultural Geography, 12(2), pp.107~122 (2011)
  25. Lees, L., "Towards a critical geography of architecture: The case of an ersatz Colosseum", Ecumene, 8(1), pp.51~86 (2001)
  26. Llewellyn, M., "Polyvocalism and the public: “doing” a critical historical geography of architecture", Area, 35(3), pp.264~270 (2003)
  27. Lorimer, H., "Cultural geography: the busyness of being “more-than-representational", Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), pp.83~94 (2005)
  28. McNeill, D., "Mobile Urbanism", pp.147~166 (2011), University of Minnesota Press
  29. Miller, D., "Acknowledging Consumption" (1995), Routledge
  30. 오정준, "재현과 수행으로서의 관광객 사진: ‘러버덕 프로젝트 서울’을 중심으로", 대한지리학회지, 50(2), pp.217~237 (2015), 대한지리학회
  31. Olds, K., "Globalizing Shanghai: the “global intelligence corps” and the building of Pudong", Cities, 14(2), pp.109~123 (1997)
  32. 박경환, "글로벌 시대 인문지리학에 있어서 행위자-네트워크 이론(ANT)의 적용 가능성", 한국도시지리학회지, 17(1), pp.57~78 (2014), 한국도시지리학회
  33. Park, W.-S., "A Hope Math to Change Seoul" (2011)
  34. Rose, G., "More on “big things”: building events and feelings", Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(3), pp.334~349 (2010)
  35. Thrift, N., "Spatial Formations" (1996), Sage
  36. Thrift, N., "Knowing Capitalism" (2004), Sage
  37. Thrift, N., "Different atmospheres: of Sloterdijk, China, and site", Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(1), pp.119~138 (2009)
  38. Donga Daily, "Opera house and vegetable garden", ~ (2012)
  39. Kookminilbo, "Se-Hoon Oh projects’ sunken costs", ~ (2012)
  40. Newsis, "Mong-Joon Jung to build The Asian Torchlight at Nodeulseom", ~ (2014)
  41. SBS, "How to Eat Well and Live Long", ~ (2014)
  42. Shindonga, "Won-Soon Park criticizes Se-Hoon Oh as a re-election strategy", ~ (2013)
  43. Yonhapnews, "Seung-Woo Yoo “22 Daily Average Visitors to Nodeulseom", ~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)