해협양안 경제협력 기본협정에 대한 연구
A Legal Study on Cross-Straits Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
On June 29, 2010, Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits(ARATS) President Chen Yunlin and Straits Exchange Foundation(SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung held talks in Chongqing, mainland China. The two sides jointly confirmed the contents of the Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement(ECFA) and the Cross-Strait Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Cooperation, and completed the signing ceremony. The two sides also discussed and reached consensus on issues for the next round of talks. ECFA is a comprehensive agreement. The content of ECFA substantially covers main economic activities (trade in goods and service, investment and economy) across the Strait. Comparing with terms “Mainland and Hong Kong or Macao” in Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement(CEPA), “Across the Taiwan Strait” is more acceptable for two parties, and also comparing with term “Arrangement” in CEPA, “Agreement” is more acceptable for political consideration. Among “the four Asian dragons”, Hong Kong, Singapore and Chinese Taipei conclude RTAs with Mainland China. It is right time for initiating negotiation on China-Korea FTA.
Abstract
On June 29, 2010, Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits(ARATS) President Chen Yunlin and Straits Exchange Foundation(SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung held talks in Chongqing, mainland China. The two sides jointly confirmed the contents of the Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement(ECFA) and the Cross-Strait Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Cooperation, and completed the signing ceremony. The two sides also discussed and reached consensus on issues for the next round of talks. ECFA is a comprehensive agreement. The content of ECFA substantially covers main economic activities (trade in goods and service, investment and economy) across the Strait. Comparing with terms “Mainland and Hong Kong or Macao” in Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement(CEPA), “Across the Taiwan Strait” is more acceptable for two parties, and also comparing with term “Arrangement” in CEPA, “Agreement” is more acceptable for political consideration. Among “the four Asian dragons”, Hong Kong, Singapore and Chinese Taipei conclude RTAs with Mainland China. It is right time for initiating negotiation on China-Korea FTA.
참고문헌 (10)
- 배승빈, "중ㆍ대만 ECFA의 협상 추이 및 시사점", KIEP 지역경제포커스, (16) (2010)
- 宮占奎, "建立海峡两岸经济合作框架协议问题硏究" (2009), 南开学报
- 韩龍, "论CEPA的法律性质", 河南省政法管理幹部学院学报, (4) (2005)
- 刘光华, "海峡两岸经济合作框架协议: 从政治议題转換为法律命題", 海峡法学, (2) (2010)
- 慕亞平, "论CEPA的性质及其实施问題", 广西師范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (3) (2005)
- 韋经建, "论CEPA的性质, 效力及其爭议解決模式", 當代法学, (3) (2004)
- 吳益民, "论WTO框架下CEPA的若干法律问題", 法治论叢(上海政法学院学报), (3) (2007)
- 曾华群, "论內地与香港CEPA之性质", 廈门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (6) (2004)
- 鐘立国, "从NAFTA到AUSFTA: 区域贸易协定爭端解決机制的晩近发展及其对两岸经济 合作框架协议的启示", 时代法学, (6) (2009)
- ZENG Huaqun, "Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement across the Taiwan Strait and Its Impacts on Northeast Asia", Korea-China Symposium on Korea-China FTA (2010)