어휘 오류에 대한 진단적 차원의 이해 -외국인 학습자들을 대상으로-
The diagnostic understanding of lexical errors - in the focus on the foreign learners of Korean -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is very important diagnostically to understand psychological process what errors are appeared as well as analysis of phenomena of them such as erasion, morphological errors, collocation errors words generated by foreign learners of Korean. Metaphorically speaking, it is alike that the doctor should make a diagnosis on why patients hurt rather than know they are sick. This paper clarifies the results for this view. I firstly argued that the errors should be considered that they do not belong to either L1 or L2. because they as themselves have the characteristics of the intermediate language. Therefore, I assert to use the terms of errors of L1 approaching interference, ones of L2 approaching interference, and L1 and L2 approaching interference instead of using interlingual errors, intralingual ones and complex ones. The second, this paper clarified that errors of semantic similarity, errors of idiomatic collocation can be vested in error type of L1 approaching interference, not errors of L2 approaching interference according the difference of languages. It is imply that causes of error each can be possible to vary, even though superficially can be vested in the same type. The third, there is the type of error that L1 rule incorrectly transfers L2 rule, that means, the type of 'correspondence of L1 rule to L2 rule', even though an existing discussion didn't mention it. Fore example, it is Errors of Sino-Korean numeral collocation generated by Japanese learners. The fourth, Errors of omission or incompletion and errors of word coinage are resulted from wrong correspondence of L1 lexicon to L2 syntactic component, not the correspondence of L1 lexicon to L2 lexicon. The fifth, the phenomenon of redundancy errors is not the type of complex interference corresponding L1 lexicon to L2 lexicon, but ones corresponding different component to each especially Argentan learner. It also means that each one in which superficially has the same phenomena can be nested on the other type.
Abstract
It is very important diagnostically to understand psychological process what errors are appeared as well as analysis of phenomena of them such as erasion, morphological errors, collocation errors words generated by foreign learners of Korean. Metaphorically speaking, it is alike that the doctor should make a diagnosis on why patients hurt rather than know they are sick. This paper clarifies the results for this view. I firstly argued that the errors should be considered that they do not belong to either L1 or L2. because they as themselves have the characteristics of the intermediate language. Therefore, I assert to use the terms of errors of L1 approaching interference, ones of L2 approaching interference, and L1 and L2 approaching interference instead of using interlingual errors, intralingual ones and complex ones. The second, this paper clarified that errors of semantic similarity, errors of idiomatic collocation can be vested in error type of L1 approaching interference, not errors of L2 approaching interference according the difference of languages. It is imply that causes of error each can be possible to vary, even though superficially can be vested in the same type. The third, there is the type of error that L1 rule incorrectly transfers L2 rule, that means, the type of 'correspondence of L1 rule to L2 rule', even though an existing discussion didn't mention it. Fore example, it is Errors of Sino-Korean numeral collocation generated by Japanese learners. The fourth, Errors of omission or incompletion and errors of word coinage are resulted from wrong correspondence of L1 lexicon to L2 syntactic component, not the correspondence of L1 lexicon to L2 lexicon. The fifth, the phenomenon of redundancy errors is not the type of complex interference corresponding L1 lexicon to L2 lexicon, but ones corresponding different component to each especially Argentan learner. It also means that each one in which superficially has the same phenomena can be nested on the other type.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김명광, "스페인어권 한국어 학습자를 위한 한국어 초성 자음 학습 순서에 대한 연구", 우리말교육현장연구, 10(1), pp.427~459 (2016), 우리말교육현장학회
- 김명광, "문법 형식 ‘-찌, -방’에 대한 단어 형성 과정 진단 - 중국 유학생들의 자료를 중심으로 -", 국어교육, (129), pp.143~176 (2009), 한국어교육학회
- 김슬나, "일본어권 한국어 학습자의 한자어 오류 분석 연구", 석사, 한국어교육전공, pp.2014
- 노병호, "중국어 모어 화자의 한국어 학습자의 쓰기에 나타난 오류 분석 -어휘 오류를 중심으로-", 한국융합학회논문지, 6(5), pp.131~142 (2015), 한국융합학회[DOI]
- 박선희, "한국어 사용에서 나타나는 어휘 오류에 대한 분석 연구 ― 중급단계학습자를 중심으로", 한국(조선)어교육연구, 9, pp.237~253 (2014), 중국한국(조선)어교육연구학회
- 신성철, "English L1-Korean L2 learners’ Cognitive Knowledge and Difficulty of Grammatical Error Items", 언어사실과 관점, 37, pp.173~201 (2016), 언어정보연구원
- 안병팔, "서경대학교 학생의 러시아어 자기소개서에 나타난 오류의 중간어 양상", 슬라브硏究, 31(4), pp.199~228 (2015), 러시아연구소
- 이금희, "중국인 유학생 글쓰기 과제에 나타난 어휘 오류 양상과 교육 방안", 텍스트언어학, 40, pp.161~198 (2016), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 이병운, "베트남 학습자의 한국어 어휘사용 오류경향 분석", 교사교육연구, 51(2), pp.313~322 (2012), 과학교육연구소
- 이익섭, "사회언어학" (1994), 민음사
- 이정희, "중국어권 한국어 학습자의 어휘 오류 연구 －원인 분석을 중심으로－", 한국어교육, 19(3), pp.403~425 (2008), 국제한국어교육학회
- 이주영, "중국어권 한국어 학습자의 어휘 오류 원인에 대한 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2008
- 진제희, "상호 작용 상황에서 나타난 한국어 학습자들의 의사소통 전략 양상,", 이중언어학, 17, pp.339~358 (2000), 이중언어학회
- 진제희, "한국어 학습자들의 의사소통 전략 유형 분류 및 분석 - 비상호적상황을 중심으로", 한국어 교육, 11(1), pp.175~199 (2000), 국제한국어교육학회
- 정소현, "한국어・영어 code-switching에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2013
- 한국어 학습자의 오류 유형 조사 연구, "조철현", 문화관광부, ~ (2002)
- 차숙정, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 쓰기에서나타나는 어휘 오류", 한국어교육, 17(1), pp.415~436 (2006), 국제한국어교육학회
- 홍은진, "일본인 한국어 학습자의 어휘 오류 분석", 사회언어학, 12(1), pp.271~299 (2004), 한국사회언어학회
- Douglas Brown, H, "Principles of language learning and teaching", pp.207~210 (2000), Longman
- James, C, "Errors in Language Learning and Use" (1998), Longman
- Seoung-Chul Shin, "High Frequency Grammatical Errors in KFL Learners’Compositions", 한국어교육, 13(1), pp.307~338 (2002), 국제한국어교육학회
- Seoung-Chul Shin, "High Frequency Grammatical Errors in KFL Learners`Compositions", 국제한국어교육학회 학술대회논문집, pp.175~183 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
- Seoung-Chul Shin, "Acceptability of some Korean Lexical items judged by Korean L1 and L2 speakers", 국제한국어교육학회 학술대회논문집, pp.171~179 (2006), 국제한국어교육학회
- Seoung-Chul Shin, "Seung Hae Kang(2015), L2 Korean Learners’ Cognitive Knowledge on High Frequency Grammatical Error Items", 국제한국어교육학회 학술대회논문집, pp.383~402 (2015), 국제한국어교육학회
- S PitCorder, "Introducing applied linguistics" (1974), Penguin Books