中国环境公益诉讼的必要性
A Study on the Necessity of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
China has made a great progress in economic development; meanwhile it has paid a heavy price with respect to the environment. Environment has been destroyed so heavily as to constrain further development and impact social harmony. However litigations appealed by the citizens for the environment interest often are not fulfilled by the court. Thus,reconsideration of economic development model and environmental protection system becomes imperative. Reality proves that the existing regulatory approach and dispute resolution methods concerning the environment failed to protect it. First the existing design of the system is originally against the interest of the special attributes of the environment. The environmental public interest is with respect to citizens who live there. Environmental effects are latent,long-lasting, and causing wide-spread damage and it has proved that if environmental supervision is performed entirely by state power, citizens being completely excluded from public participation in protection and supervision,will lead to further damage to the environment. Such properties of environmental interest illustrate that in order to protect the environment citizens, the real subjects of environmental interest, should take part in environmental protection and supervision. From a national view, it made the problem that taking economic construction as the center and ignoring environmental interest which makes environment eventually becomes a major bottleneck constraining economic development, and even make it close to the limit. Moreover, the dispute caused by environmental damage, especially the surge of dispute by environmental groups has also affected social harmonic development. Chinese government which takes social stability as the first urgent need has to introduce environmental public interest litigation to solve environmental group disputes, protect environment, and sustain economic development. China’s reformation, opening up and introducing market economy in the past several decades created not only economic growth but also awakened citizenships such as the public awareness of environmental rights simulated by the increasing environmental problem. The citizens gradually come to realize that, in the case that the right to appeal is severely limited and the government has no constraints, environment protection relying solely on the national bureaucracy is not enough. In recent years, Chineseenvironmental public interest litigation emerging one after another occupied a corner of the news media and it reflects some kind of public awareness of environmental rights and even taking action for that rights. However most of the environmental public interest litigations are not fulfilled by the court quoting conservative procedural provisions. Public awareness and participation in environmental decision-making urgently need revision of litigation system relating to the environment public interest. The value of public interest litigation system is that it will effectively resolve conflict over collective rights and make the social forces play an important role in the “public interest”, in which the government can’t work well. Encouraging citizens and community groups by public interest litigation to assist the government to carry out protection work on collective environmental interests can prevent the environmental infringement from its bud state as much as possible to reduce the social cost; on the other hand,after the infringement, it can provide a convenient channel to maintain victim groups. A quiet revolution in the litigation is beginning by introducing the environmental public interest litigation. This revolution, whose symbol is shown by the expansion of the right to appeal, is uncovering the original state of the nation to citizens. In this process it needs to adjust national authorities and give the court more resources to establish the judicial authority.
Abstract
China has made a great progress in economic development; meanwhile it has paid a heavy price with respect to the environment. Environment has been destroyed so heavily as to constrain further development and impact social harmony. However litigations appealed by the citizens for the environment interest often are not fulfilled by the court. Thus,reconsideration of economic development model and environmental protection system becomes imperative. Reality proves that the existing regulatory approach and dispute resolution methods concerning the environment failed to protect it. First the existing design of the system is originally against the interest of the special attributes of the environment. The environmental public interest is with respect to citizens who live there. Environmental effects are latent,long-lasting, and causing wide-spread damage and it has proved that if environmental supervision is performed entirely by state power, citizens being completely excluded from public participation in protection and supervision,will lead to further damage to the environment. Such properties of environmental interest illustrate that in order to protect the environment citizens, the real subjects of environmental interest, should take part in environmental protection and supervision. From a national view, it made the problem that taking economic construction as the center and ignoring environmental interest which makes environment eventually becomes a major bottleneck constraining economic development, and even make it close to the limit. Moreover, the dispute caused by environmental damage, especially the surge of dispute by environmental groups has also affected social harmonic development. Chinese government which takes social stability as the first urgent need has to introduce environmental public interest litigation to solve environmental group disputes, protect environment, and sustain economic development. China’s reformation, opening up and introducing market economy in the past several decades created not only economic growth but also awakened citizenships such as the public awareness of environmental rights simulated by the increasing environmental problem. The citizens gradually come to realize that, in the case that the right to appeal is severely limited and the government has no constraints, environment protection relying solely on the national bureaucracy is not enough. In recent years, Chineseenvironmental public interest litigation emerging one after another occupied a corner of the news media and it reflects some kind of public awareness of environmental rights and even taking action for that rights. However most of the environmental public interest litigations are not fulfilled by the court quoting conservative procedural provisions. Public awareness and participation in environmental decision-making urgently need revision of litigation system relating to the environment public interest. The value of public interest litigation system is that it will effectively resolve conflict over collective rights and make the social forces play an important role in the “public interest”, in which the government can’t work well. Encouraging citizens and community groups by public interest litigation to assist the government to carry out protection work on collective environmental interests can prevent the environmental infringement from its bud state as much as possible to reduce the social cost; on the other hand,after the infringement, it can provide a convenient channel to maintain victim groups. A quiet revolution in the litigation is beginning by introducing the environmental public interest litigation. This revolution, whose symbol is shown by the expansion of the right to appeal, is uncovering the original state of the nation to citizens. In this process it needs to adjust national authorities and give the court more resources to establish the judicial authority.
참고문헌 (30)
- 黄学贤, "行政公益诉讼研究" (2008), 中国政法大学出版社
- 张卫平, "民事诉讼法" (2009), 法律出版社
- 傅郁林, "民事司法制度的功能与结构" (2006), 北京大学出版社
- 项焱, "公益诉讼的理念与实践" (2010), 武汉大学出版社
- 张修成, "1978年以来中国信访工作研究——以山东威海为个案", 박사, pp.2007
- 王灿发, "环境纠纷处理的理论与实践——环境纠纷处理中日国际研讨会论文集" (2002), 中国政法大学出版社
- 宫本宪一, "环境经济学", 生活•读书•新知三联书店, pp.65~66 (2004)
- 孙汉琦, "韩国的调解及和解制度", 2011年延世大学专门法学院•北京大学法学院共同学术会议 (2011)
- 孙汉琦, "有关中国群体纠纷的解决制度的研究——以环境纠纷为中心, In 法学研究", 20(4) (2010)
- 齐树洁, "接近“环境正义:域外经验与我国实践", 南京大学法学评论, 秋季 (2009)
- 洪大用, "当代中国社会转型与环境问题", 东南学术, (5) (2000)
- 冯露, "环境纠纷行政解决机制的实证研究——以S县环境监察大队为主要考察对象", 南京大学法学评论, 秋季 (2010)
- 程金华, "社会阶层与民事纠纷的解决——转型时期中国的社会分化与法治发展", 社会学研究, (2) (2010)
- 程金华, "中国行政纠纷解决的制度选择——以公民需求为视角", 中国社会科学, (6) (2009)
- 汪庆华, "中国行政诉讼:多中心主义的司法", 中外法学, (5) (2007)
- 章武生, "我国群体诉讼的立法与司法实践", 法学研究, (2) (2007)
- 孔金萍, "有关中国环境公益诉讼原告适格的研究", 民事诉讼, 14(2), pp.409~411 (2010)
- 刘树枝, "关于妥善处理群体性上访问题的调研与思考", 人民信访, (7) (2005)
- 于建嵘, "中国信访制度批判, 综合版", 中国改革, (2) (2005)
- 裴小梅, "对涉法上访问题的理性思考", 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, (2) (2005)
- "潘岳: 修修补补解决不了环境问题:须完善法律"[URL]
- "告别“风暴”,建设制度"[URL]
- "中国水污染是体制问题, In 南方都市报" (2007)[URL]
- 安徽固镇环保局六名干部因依法行政被集体停职, , ~ (2010)
- "<行政强制法>能解环保部门执法难吗?, IN 中国环境报第3版" (2011)[URL]
- "江苏河北等省群众越级信访事件调查"[URL]
- "关于环境影响评价制度的一些思考"[URL]
- "民诉法大修涉及7大方面首次引入公益诉讼"[URL]
- 吕忠梅, "探究群体性环境纠纷的司法救济机制", 北大法律信息网
