中国环境公益诉讼中的原告适格问题 - 困境与出路 -
The New Development on the Standing Criteria in China’s Environmental Public Interest Litigation System - Plights and Outlets -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
环境公益诉讼制度是环境立法和司法实践的一项重要内容, 而构建环境公益诉讼的核心在于 适格原告的选择。 中国环境公益诉讼的模式选择和对原告主体资格标准的界定应当及时回应当下环境保护立法的局限和司法实践中面临的困境, 并充分考量、 借鉴和汲取环境公益诉讼的域外经验。 扩大环境治理和环境执法中的民主参与范围, 充分发挥环保团体在环境公益诉讼, 特别是环境行政公益诉讼中的作用和优势地位, 应当作为破解我国环境公益诉讼制度现实困境的一项关键的制度出路。
Abstract
The construction of the environmental public interest litigations is an essential part in environmental lawmaking as well as judicial practice. Meanwhile, the standing criteria have been regarded as the core of the environmental public interest litigation system. In recognizing the existing legislative limitations as well as practical challenges in face of the environmental protection and environmental governance in China, it is important, indeed necessary, to draw from local as well as foreign experience, exploring the environmental public interest litigation model and standing criteria that work best for China. To this end, widening public participation in the environmental governance and environmental law enforcement, especially bringing environmental NGOs into full play and sublimation in terms of public interest litigations, should serve as the key in search of a sustainable development of the environmental public interest litigation system in China.
참고문헌 (13)
- 叶勇飞, "论环境民事公益诉讼", 中国法学, 5, pp.105~111 (2004)
- 约瑟夫, "保卫环境：公民诉讼战略" (2011), 中国政法大学出版社
- 张大海, "论我国环境保护团体诉讼的构建——以德国环境保护团体诉讼制度为参考", 法律适用, 8, pp.35~39 (2012)
- 齐树洁, "美国公民诉讼的原告资格及其借鉴意义", 河北法学, 9, pp.161~165 (2009)
- 艾卡, "欧盟和德国的环境保护集体诉讼", 交大法学, 4, pp.5~14 (2015)
- 李楯主, "环境公益诉讼观察报告（2015年卷）" (2016), 法律出版社
- 王曦, "完善我国环境公益诉讼制度的思考", 中州学刊, 3, pp.49~54 (2016)
- Cass Sunstein, "What’s Standing after Lujan of Citizen Suits, ‘Injuries’, and Article III", Michigan Law Review, 91, pp.163~165 (1992)
- Jonathan Adler, "Citizen Suit and the Future of Standing", the 21st Century: From Lujan to Laidlaw and Beyond: Stand or Deliver: Citizen Suits, Standing, and Environmental Protection, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 12 (2001)
- Access to Justice in Environmental Matters: Final Report, "Nicolas de Sadeleer", ~ (2002)
- Hanna Tolsma, "The Rice and Fall of Access to Justice in the Netherlands", Journal of Environmental Law, 21, pp.309~321 (2009)
- Robin Kundis Craig, "Will Separation of Powers Challenges ‘Take Care’ of Environmental Citizen Suits? Article II, Injury-in-fact, Private ‘Enforcers’, and Lessons from Qui Tam Litigation", University of Colorado Law Review, 72, pp.94~ (2001)
- Matthew Burrows, "The Clean Air Act: Citizen Suits, Attorney’s Fees, And the Separate Public Interest Requirement", Environmental Affairs, 36, pp.103~134 (2009)