본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

无人驾驶汽车归责及责任主体探析

Analysis on the Doctrine of Liability Fixation and the Subject of Responsibility of Driverless Cars

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

身处在当今这样一个大数据、人工智能的时代,面临着科学技术的飞速发展,无人驾驶汽车的问世似乎情理之中. 无人驾驶技术因其便利性与智能性深深的吸引着人们对它的好奇心,越来越多的互联网公司以及传统的汽车生产公司投入到无人驾驶汽车的研发之中,力求在该领域抢占一席之地. 随着无人驾驶汽车在技术层面的进一步突破,各国都面临着法律规范层面的难题亟待解决. 无人驾驶旨在带给人们便捷、安全的出行方式,但是无人驾驶汽车引发的大大小小的安全事故,在法律缺位的情形下,使公众充满了疑虑. 长此以往,将不利于该项新兴技术的发展. 技术的进步总是会给法律提出新的挑战,无人驾驶技术的发展同样离不开法律规范的保驾护航. 因此,应当尽快明确无人驾驶汽车发生事故后的责任承担,其中最重要的两个问题就是归责原则和责任主体. 本文将结合近些年来国内外无人驾驶汽车发生的各种事故来引出问题,再结合国内外的相关立法来窥视无人驾驶汽车在我国法律层面的问题与不足,着重分析无人驾驶汽车发生事故后的归责原则和责任主体. 在探讨归责原则和责任主体时,笔者将根据无人驾驶汽车的自动化程度分层次进行讨论,最后为无人驾驶汽车在法律制度的构建上提出自己小小的建议.

Abstract

In this era of big data and artificial intelligence, envisaging the rapid development of science and technology, it seems reasonable that driverless cars should be born. Because of the convenience and intelligent of Self-driving technology, it is deep to attract people's curiosity. An increasing number of Internet companies as well as the traditional automobile production companies invest in the research and development of driverless cars to snag a spot in this field. With the further breakthrough of driverless cars in the technical level, every country is faced with the problem of legal norms. Self-driving technology aims to bring people convenient and safe way to travel, but in the absence of legislation, those accidents caused by driverless cars make the public is full of worries. If things continue this way, this will be detrimental to the development of this new technology. The progress of technology will always bring new challenges to legislation, and the development of self-driving technology is also inseparable from the protection of legislation. Therefore, it is necessary to make clear the responsibility commitment in the accident of the driverless car as soon as possible, and two of the most important issues are the doctrine of liability fixation and the subject of responsibility. This article will use driverless cars accidents at home and abroad to raise the question, and probe into the problems and shortcomings of driverless cars in legislation of our country through related legislation at home and abroad, concentrating on analyzing the doctrine of liability fixation and the subject of responsibility in the accident of the driverless car. When discussing the doctrine of liability fixation and the subject of responsibility, this paper will discuss according to the degree of automation of driverless cars. And finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions for the construction of legal system for driverless cars.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. "特斯拉无人驾驶死亡司机" (2016)[URL]
  2. "谷歌无人驾驶汽车撞公交:谷歌的错?" (2016)[URL]
  3. "美国首辆无人驾驶巴士上路首日出事故, 没想到居然还是人祸" (2017)[URL]
  4. "背靠福特的Argo无人车发生严重事故, 两名乘客已送往医院" (2018)[URL]
  5. "优步自动驾驶汽车撞死一女子 系全球首例致死事故" (2018)[URL]
  6. "美国第一部自动驾驶法案—Self Drive Act 全文解读" (2017)[URL]
  7. "它离我们有多远: 市面上根本没有一辆真正的自动驾驶汽车" (2018)[URL]
  8. "自动驾驶首起命案优步担责 专家:十年内难真正运用" (2018)[URL]
  9. 孙泳, "优者危险负担 原则之适用", 江苏法制报 (2013)
  10. 赵燕霞, "《道路交通安全法》第76条第(二)项归责原则探析", 法制与社会, (2) (2017)
  11. 李新天, "论机动车交通事故责任的赔偿主体", 时代法学, (6) (2014)
  12. 曾兴华, "机动车损害赔偿责任主体研究", 국제거래와 법, (13), pp.55~76 (2015), 법학연구소
  13. 乔维高, "无人驾驶汽车的发展现状及方向", 上海汽车, (7) (2007)
  14. "第一个获得合法公民身份的机器人已诞生, 人机是否真能和谐共存" (2017)[URL]
  15. 魏英杰, "给无人驾驶汽车系上法律“安全带”", 发明与创新, (8) (2017)
  16. Sharon L. Poczter, "The Google Car: Driving Toward A Better Future?", Journal of Business Case Studies (2014)
  17. "Factsheet: Federal automated vehicles policyoverview" (2016)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)