본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

광양 방언의 성조 연구

A Study on the Tonology of Gwangyang Dialect, Korean -For Gwangyang Dialect as Main-

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this paper is to describe the morpho-tonemics of complex nouns of Jinsang dialect, Gwangyang City, based on the side-dot theory. This dialect has three tone system, which consist of an unmarked even tone and two marked tones, which are departing tone and rising tone. The even tone ‘phyeong-sheong’ is symbolized as □ with no dot, the rising tone, the departing tone ‘geo-sheong’ as ·□ with one dot, and the rising tone ‘shang-sheong’ as :□ with two dots. The symbols □, ·□, and :□ are common signs in Middle Korean and all its modern daughter tone dialects. The five main morpho-tonemic rules of this dialect are the neutralization rule, the 1nternal tone-sandhi rule or external phyeong-sheong assimilation rule, the word initial position phyeong-sheong assimilation rule, and the rule chainging final syllable into cheuk-sheong (·□). The symbols □, ·□, and :□ are decided according to the neutralization force exercising upon the following syllable and on the basis of phonetic complexity of pitch. The three tones □, ·□, and :□ can be opposed to each other at the word initial position. Both even tone □ and marked tone ·□ can can be opposed to each other at the position after the even tone □, but rising tone is neutralized as ·□ except at the word initial position. Marked tone ·□ only can appear at the position after ·□, or :□. The neutralization has the highest frequency and the wide scope of application as shown in the other Korean tomic dialects. The neutralization rule is characterized as follows. Rising tone and departing tone are neutralized as one dot tone (·□) behind unmarked plain tone (·□), and all the tones (□, ·□, and :□) neutralized as one dot tone(·□) behind marked tones (·□ and :□). There are no changes with side-dot when plain tone pattern (□₁) combines with following unmarked plain tone pattern (□₁) or complex pattern (□₁·□n), to which we can give a name ‘default rule’. When a plain tone pattern (□₁) combines with any verbal inflectional form in marked pattern (·□1)or :□₁), all syllables in the verbal form are essentially changed into plain tone (□₁), we give a name external tone-sandhi rule or external phyeong-sheong assimilation. This rule is essential in southeast Gyeongnam dialects, and it is the same as in Gwangyang dialect. Phyeongbok pattern (□₂·□n), ‘mixed pattern’ is almost essentially changed into phyeongsheong pattern (□2+n·□), ‘simple pattern’ in this dialect, to which give a name internal tone-sandhi rule or internal phyeong-sheong assimilation. We cannot find out, however, phyeongsheong pattern (□₃) that have more than three syllables in the last side-dot representation. It’s because of the rule chainging final syllable into cheuk-sheong (□₃→□₂·□). In the final chapter, when a compound is generated with one or more of the rules above, we first divide the generated side-dot pattern into phyeongcheuk pattern, geosheong pattern, and shangsheong pattern, and redivide the word into derivations and compound, put the data in order again according to the rules that are applied, Phyeongcheuk pattern was 60%, geosheong pattern was 24%, and shangsheong pattern was 16%, especially neutratralized rules was 99% of the rules derive compounds as geosheong pattern, shangsheong pattern.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the morpho-tonemics of complex nouns of Jinsang dialect, Gwangyang City, based on the side-dot theory. This dialect has three tone system, which consist of an unmarked even tone and two marked tones, which are departing tone and rising tone. The even tone ‘phyeong-sheong’ is symbolized as □ with no dot, the rising tone, the departing tone ‘geo-sheong’ as ·□ with one dot, and the rising tone ‘shang-sheong’ as :□ with two dots. The symbols □, ·□, and :□ are common signs in Middle Korean and all its modern daughter tone dialects. The five main morpho-tonemic rules of this dialect are the neutralization rule, the 1nternal tone-sandhi rule or external phyeong-sheong assimilation rule, the word initial position phyeong-sheong assimilation rule, and the rule chainging final syllable into cheuk-sheong (·□). The symbols □, ·□, and :□ are decided according to the neutralization force exercising upon the following syllable and on the basis of phonetic complexity of pitch. The three tones □, ·□, and :□ can be opposed to each other at the word initial position. Both even tone □ and marked tone ·□ can can be opposed to each other at the position after the even tone □, but rising tone is neutralized as ·□ except at the word initial position. Marked tone ·□ only can appear at the position after ·□, or :□. The neutralization has the highest frequency and the wide scope of application as shown in the other Korean tomic dialects. The neutralization rule is characterized as follows. Rising tone and departing tone are neutralized as one dot tone (·□) behind unmarked plain tone (·□), and all the tones (□, ·□, and :□) neutralized as one dot tone(·□) behind marked tones (·□ and :□). There are no changes with side-dot when plain tone pattern (□₁) combines with following unmarked plain tone pattern (□₁) or complex pattern (□₁·□n), to which we can give a name ‘default rule’. When a plain tone pattern (□₁) combines with any verbal inflectional form in marked pattern (·□1)or :□₁), all syllables in the verbal form are essentially changed into plain tone (□₁), we give a name external tone-sandhi rule or external phyeong-sheong assimilation. This rule is essential in southeast Gyeongnam dialects, and it is the same as in Gwangyang dialect. Phyeongbok pattern (□₂·□n), ‘mixed pattern’ is almost essentially changed into phyeongsheong pattern (□2+n·□), ‘simple pattern’ in this dialect, to which give a name internal tone-sandhi rule or internal phyeong-sheong assimilation. We cannot find out, however, phyeongsheong pattern (□₃) that have more than three syllables in the last side-dot representation. It’s because of the rule chainging final syllable into cheuk-sheong (□₃→□₂·□). In the final chapter, when a compound is generated with one or more of the rules above, we first divide the generated side-dot pattern into phyeongcheuk pattern, geosheong pattern, and shangsheong pattern, and redivide the word into derivations and compound, put the data in order again according to the rules that are applied, Phyeongcheuk pattern was 60%, geosheong pattern was 24%, and shangsheong pattern was 16%, especially neutratralized rules was 99% of the rules derive compounds as geosheong pattern, shangsheong pattern.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 강흥구, "울진방언 사조와 음조에 대한 연구", 어문연구, (43), pp.31~52 (2003), 어문연구학회
  2. 강흥구, "강릉 방언 1음절 어간 풀이씨의 성조", 한글, (270), pp.5~63 (2005), 한글학회
  3. 강흥구, "울진 방언 가사문학 작품의 성조 연구", 한말연구, (19), pp.1~65 (2006), 한말연구학회
  4. 강흥구, "울진 방언 가사문학 작품 ≪유람일기≫의 운율의 분석적 연구", 어문연구, (54), pp.31~80 (2007), 어문연구학회
  5. 강흥구, "울진 방언 가사(歌辭)의 운율 연구", 한말연구, (23), pp.1~62 (2008), 한말연구학회
  6. 구현옥, "국어 성조 기술 방법 비교 연구", 한글, 260, pp.5~40 (2003), 한글학회
  7. 김세진, "경남 서남부 방언의 성조 연구", 박사, pp.2006
  8. 김세진, "사천 방언과 하동 방언 평측형 풀이씨의 형태성조론적 고찰", 한글, (277), pp.47~99 (2007), 한글학회
  9. 김세진, "우리말 방언 성조 체계 설정 방법 -대립과 중화에 바탕을 두고-", 어문연구, (44), pp.79~124 (2004), 어문연구학회
  10. 김영만, "고금 성조 비교 재론", 한글, (149), pp.43~76 (1972), 한글 학회
  11. 김영만, "국어초분절음소의 사적연구", 박사, pp.1986
  12. 김완진, "중세국어 성조의 연구" (1977), 탑출판사
  13. 김주원, "경상도 방언의 성조 기술방법-표기 방법의 표준화를 위한 시론", 어학연구, 27(3), pp.585~608 (1991), 서울대학교 어학연구소
  14. 김차균, "경상도 방언의 성조 체계" (1980), 과학사
  15. 김차균, "우리말의 성조" (1993), 태학사
  16. 김차균, "방점법", 언어학, 15, pp.145~167 (1993), 한국언어학회
  17. 김차균, "나랏말과 겨레의 슬기에 바탕을 둔 음운학 강의" (1998), 태학사
  18. 김차균, "우리말 방언 성조의 비교" (1999), 도서출판 역락
  19. 김차균, "국어 방언 성조론" (2002), 도서출판 역락
  20. 김차균, "영호남 방언 운율 비교" (2002), 도서출판 역락
  21. 김차균, "영남 방언 성조 비교" (2003), 도서출판 역락
  22. 김차균, "성조 연구 in : 허웅 선생의 우리말 연구", pp.159~225 (2005), 태학사
  23. 김차균, "중부 동해안 방언 성조의 비교" (2006), 서출판 글누림
  24. 김차균, "광양시 진상 방언의 성조형과 음조형", 한글, (285), pp.5~70 (2009), 한글학회
  25. 김차균, "경남 동남부 방언의 성조 체계", 언어학, (50), pp.23~119 (2008), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  26. 박숙희, "경북 동해안 방언의 성조 연구" (2008), 도서출판 역락
  27. 성철재, "Q-tone 청취 등급을 이용한 경남 동남부 방언 성조 분석", 한글, (279), pp.5~33 (2008), 한글학회
  28. 이돈주, "한중한자음연구" (2003), 태학사
  29. 이문규, "대구 방언의 성조 중화 현상", 문학과 언어, (18), pp.21~44 (1997)
  30. 이문규, "성조소 기술 방법론의 비교 연구", 언어과학 연구, (15), pp.213~231 (1998)
  31. 이문규, "경북 방언 의문문의 성조 연구", 한글, (252), pp.5~45 (2001), 한글 학회
  32. 이문규, "대구방언과 안동방언의 성조 비교 연구", 어문학, 77, pp.101~149 (2002), 한국어문학회
  33. 이호영, "서울말과 경상도 방언의 운율 유형론", 언어학, (15), pp.353~382 (1993), 한국언어학회
  34. 임석규, "동남방언의 성조소에 대한 재검토", 국어국문학, 135, pp.21~40 (2003), 국어국문학회
  35. 정원수, "경북 방언의 복합 동사 형성에 나타나는 성조 변동 연구", 한글, (224), pp.73~94 (1994), 한글 학회
  36. 최명옥, "동남 방언의 성조형과 그 분포", 제18회 국제학술대회 논문집, pp.67~88 (1990), 학술원
  37. 최영미, "정선방언의 성조 체계와 그 역사적 변천에 대한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  38. 허웅, "방점 연구-경상도 방언 성조와의 비", 동방학지, (2), pp.37~194 (1955), 연세대학교 국학연구원
  39. 허 웅, "중세국어 연구" (1963), 정음사
  40. 大江孝男, "晋州方言のアクセント型について", 言語硏究, (71), pp.1~20 (1977), 日本言語學會
  41. 曺廷換, "韓國語昌寧方言アクセント体系―体言を中心に― in : 韓國語アクセント叢論", pp.21~49 (2000), 東京大學大學院人文社會系硏究科 附屬文化交流硏究施設 東洋諸民族言語文化部門
  42. 福井玲, "전남 광양시 방언의 액센트 체계와 그 지리적 분포에 대하여", 國語學, (31), pp.271~287 (1998)
  43. Chomsky, N., "The Sound Pattern of English" (1968), Harper & Row
  44. Ramsey, Robert S., "Accent and Morphology in Korean Dialects.:A Descriptive and Historical Study", 박사, pp.1978

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)